Functional Condition Rating Segment Sragen Ring Road South, Central Java Province

Rendy D. Pangesti, Ary Setyawan, Budi Yulianto

Abstract


Assessment of pavement condition is functionally the most important aspect in determining road maintenance and repair activities, so that the financing can be monitored properly. There are two methods in handling the road assessment, ie visually and using tools. Visual assessment can use PASER and PCI. While IRI is a road assessment using Roadroid (Android Smartphone App) tool, where the tool will be used as national reference to get IRI value, because the cost is cheaper and effective. Therefore there needs to be a correlation between the three methods. Correlation in this research is divided into three, namely the correlation of PASER value with PCI, PASER with IRI, and PCI with IRI. The research location used as research object is South Ring Road Sragen. The result of the research was obtained, road assessment using PASER method with PCI resulted correlation value of pearson 0,51. Assessment of PASER with IRI has a correlation value of pearson -0,14. While the value of PCI with IRI yield correlation value pearson -0,23. The value of the correlation coefficient between PASER and PCI has the highest value, since it has a nearly equal assessment approach by measuring the damage visually. The correlation of PCI with IRI is higher than PASER with IRI, thus proving that PCI assessment is more recommended because it can accommodate all types of road damage.

Keywords


PASER; PCI; IRI Roadroid

Full Text:

PDF

References


D. Setijowarno, “Menuju Toleransi Nol Persen,” 2008. County Road Association of Michigan Department of Transportation (CRAM MDOT). Not Dated (N.D.). PASER Road Condition Survey Demonstration Project.

Douangphachanh, V. & Oneyama, H. 2014. Using Smartphones to Estimate Road Pavement Condition. SMART Infrastructure Facility, University of Wollongong, Australia.

Forslöf, Jones. 2014. Continuous Road Condition Monitoring with Smartphones. Roadroid AB.

Greg R. Wendling, P.E. 2015. Pavement Surface Evaluation And Rating Study (PASER) Zionsville, Indiana.

M. R. Schlotjes, A Visser, C Bennet. 2014. Evaluation of a smart phone roughness meter. University of Pretoria.

Napitu,W. S. 2006. Kerusakan yang Timbul pada Jalan Raya Akibat Beban Angkutan yang Melebihi dari yang Ditetapkan. Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri. v7 :104.

S.W. Haider and M.B. Dwaikat, Estimating optimum timings for preventive maintenance treatments to mitigate pavement roughness,”Transportation Research Record”, no. 2235, pp.43-53, 2011.

Stephen A. Arhin, Lakeasha N. Williams, Asteway Ribbiso, Melissa F. Anderson. 2015. Predicting Pavement Condition Index Using International Roughness Index in a Dense Urban Area. Journal of Civil Engineering Research 2015, 5(1): 10-17.

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sunset Hills, City of. “Pavement Management History”http://www.sunset-hills.com/Publicworks/ pavehist.html., Retrived January 2007.

Suswandi. A. 2008. Evaluasi Tingkat Kerusakan Jalan dengan Methode Pavement Condition Index (PCI). Forum Teknik Sipil No. XVIII/ 3 September 2008.

Walker, Donald, and Lynn Entine. 2002. PASER Asphalt Roads Manual. Madison, WI: Transportation Information Center, University of Wisconsin--Madison.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i6.3258

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.