Evaluation of Irrigation Performance at Tertiary Level (A Case Study in Padi Pomahan Irrigation Area Mojokerto East Java)

Mohamad Bagus Ansori, Nastasia Festy Margini, Danayanti Azmi Dewi Nusantara, Nadjadji Anwar

Abstract


Padi Pomahan Irrigation Area has a lack of sufficient amount of water at the downstream area in dry season. This problem is caused by some factors such as the exploitation of drinking water, climate change, land use change, and the damage of irrigation channel. The performance of irrigation channel and its facilities compared with the situation nearly 20 years later has never been evaluated and measured due to the limited of the preliminary data. With the area of 4309 hectares managed by two offices (UPT Pugeran and UPT Tangunan), the coordination become more complex to manage the irrigation water in this area. This paper aims to analyze the irrigation performance at tertiary level to measure the performance of six indicators/criterions such as physical infrastructure, plant productivity, personnel organization, operation and maintenance (OM), documentation, and institutional condition of water user associations (P3A / GP3A / IP3A). The results of its performance are expected to obtain the handling priority at the tertiary level in this irrigation system by Indonesian government. The total irrigation performance In Padi Pomahan obtains 61.0%. The result model of AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) obtains the result of personnel organization 28.9% (rank 1), plant productivity 20.3% (rank 2),  physical infrastructures 16.8% (rank 3), operation and maintenance (OM 14.2% (rank 4), institutional condition of water user associations ( P3A / GP3A / IP3A) 10.5% (rank 5) and   documentation 9.3% (rank 6). The ARP model obtains CGI value 0.13 and Consistency Ratio (CR) 0.036.


Keywords


Padi Pomahan; irrigation performance; tertiary level

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Directorate General of Water Resources regulation no. 32/PRT/M/2007. Manual Operation and Maintenance of Irrigation System, Jakarta. 2007. (in Indonesia).

Department of Public Works General Directorate of Irrigation, Criteria for Irrigation Design (KP) 01- Irrigation System, Jakarta. 1986. (in Indonesia).

Department of Public Works General Directorate of Irrigation, Criteria for Irrigation Design (KP) 05- Tertiary System, Jakarta. 1986. (in Indonesia).

Ishizaka A., Labib A. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert systems with Applications, 38(11) 14336 – 14345, 2011.

Alonso, Lamata,. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge based systems, Vol 14, No 4, 445-459. 2006

Goepel, Klaus D., BPMSG AHP Excel template with multiple inputs, version xx – http://bpmsg.com, Singapore 2013.

Goepel, Klaus D. (2013). Implementing the Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Standard Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making In Corporate Enterprises – A New AHP Excel Template with Multiple Inputs, Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2013.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i6.3294

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.