Female Body Anthropometric Variation and Breakthrough in Anthropology for Digital Modelling

Badriatut Dini, M. R. Hutagalung, D. S. Perdanakusuma, Phill T Koesbandriati, Agus Windharto

Abstract


Plastic reconstructive and aesthetic surgery has emerged to meet the challenge of improving body size and shape. Currently, body reconstruction in Indonesia refers to Caucasian parameters which may not be applicable. Moreover, patients cannot comprehend the surgeon’s prediction of the surgical outcome visually making it more difficult for the surgeon to describe the operative result. Reseach Objective is understanding the supernormal body concept in Indonesia, describing variation of normal and supernormal body indexes of Indonesians as a formulation base and to make a 3D digital modeling of normal and supernormal person. These models will be used as guidance for planning and predicting the reconstruction - aesthetic surgery in body contouring and as assisting tool for giving information visually to patients. Reseach method using applied study. Questionnaires were distributed to a hundred male and female adults respondent to obtain the concept of Indonesian normal and supernormal bodies. The Body model are 17-25 years old and then divided into 2 groups, normal and supernormal by expert juries assessment. The data of body index anthropometry were presented in tables, charts, and narration to describe normal and supernormal morphologic variations, then results between the 2 groups were compared statistically by t-test and discriminant test. Anthropometric and photographic data were used for making normal and supernormal 3D digital woman models. Criteria of body attractiveness by questionnaire were bright skin color, tallness, slimness, hour glass body shape, muscular arms, medium sized shoulders, hip, waist, breasts and buttocks, wide chest and slender legs. There were significant differences in body measurement between normal-supernormal and distinguishing parameters between normal -supernormal groups by discriminant test including chest dimension index, waist hip ratio, triceps skinfold and leg length. There were two 3D digital woman models for both normal and supernormal subjects which had measurements approximating the average values of each group.

Keywords


body measurement; contouring; 3D digital modeling; reconstructive and aesthetic

Full Text:

PDF

References


. Henss R. Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness of the female figure. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. 2000. Pers Individ Dif 28: 501–513 (Cited 20 January 2013).

. Fisher ML, Voracek M. The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. 2006. J Cosmet Dermatol 5: 190–194. (Cited 13 January 2013).

. Fan JT, Liu F, Wu J, Dai W. Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. 2004. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271: 347–352. (Cited 25 December 2012).

. Swami V, Caprario C, Tovée, M.J, Furnham A. Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study. 2006. Eur J Pers 20: 69–81. (Cited 12 January 2013).

. Barber N. Secular Changes in Standards of Bodily Attractiveness in American Women: Different Masculine and Feminine Ideals. 2010. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 132:1, 87-94. (Cited 12 January 2013).

. Crossley K.L, Cornelissen P.L., Tovée, M.J. What Is an Attractive Body? Using an Interactive 3D Program to Create the Ideal Body for You and Your Partner. 2012. (Cited 20 January 2013).

. Frederick D, Hadji M, Swami V. The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: Assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR. 2010. Body Image. vol 7. pp 51–55. (Cited 20 January 2013).

. Furnham A, Shah K, Body weight, waist-to hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health.Personality and Individual Differences. 2006. Vol 41. pp 443–454. (Cited 5 February 2013).

. Harisson K. Television Viewers’ Ideal Body Proportions: The Case of the Curvaceously Thin Woman. 2003. Sex Roles, Vol. 48, Nos. 5/6. (Cited 5 February 2013).

. Prantl L, Grundl M. Males Prefer a Larger Bust Size in Women Than Females Themselves: An Experimental Study on Female Bodily Attractiveness with Varying Weight, Bust Size, Waist Width, Hip Width, and Leg Length Independently. 2011. Aesth Plast Surg. vol. 35: pp 693–702. (Cited 5 February 2013).

. Singh C. Universal Allure of the Hourglass Figure: An Evolutionary Theory of Female Physical Attractiveness. 2006. Clin Plastic Surg.vol 33, 359–370. (Cited 15 December 2012).

. Aston S.J., Steinbreich D.S., Walden J.F., .2009. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Elsevier.

. Melvin A, Shiffman A. Body Contouring, Art, Science, and Clinical Practice. 2010. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

. Nahai F. The Art of Aesthetic Surgery, Principles and Techniques. Quality Medical Publishing, Inc.` 2005.

. Stephen J.M. Plastic Surgery : Trunk And Lower Extremety. Vol 6. Elsevier. 2006.

. Hong Y.J, Park H.S, Lee E.S. Anthropometric Analysis of Waist-to-Hip Ratio in Asian Women. 2009. Aesth Plast Surg (2009) 33:185–190. (Cited 15 December 2012).

. Jonathan CK Wells. Ecogeographical associations between climate and human body composition: Analyses based on anthropometry and skinfolds. 2012. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 147:2, 169-186. (Cited 17 January 2013).

. Lin Y, Wang MJ, Wang EM. The comparisons of anthropometric characteristics among four peoples in East Asia. 2004. Applied Ergonomics. Vol 35(2):173–178. (Cited 17 January 2013).

. Nakanishi Y, Nethery V. Anthropometric comparison between Japanese and Caucasian American male University students. 1999. Appl Human Sci ;18:9-11. (Cited 17 January 2013).

. Esme D.L, Bucksch A., Beekman W.H. Three-Dimensional Laser Imaging as a Valuable Tool for Specifying Changes in Breast Shape After Augmentation Mammaplasty. 2009. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.pp 191-195. (Cited 25 January 2013).

. Gallo G.,Guarnera G.C., Milanese, F., Modica, D., Catanuto, G., Pane, F. Parametric representation of human breast shapes. 2009. Med. Meas.and App. pp. 26-30. (Cited 20 January 2013).

. Smith KL, Cornelissen PL, Tovée, M.J Color 3D bodies and judgments of human female attractiveness. 2007. Evol Hum Behav 28: 48–54. (Cited 20 January 2013).

. Stephen M.B. The Art of Poser® and Photoshop®:The Official Guide. Course Technology Press Boston, MA, United States. 2009. (Cited 18 February 2013).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2014i1.401

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.