All-Electric Cargo Ships Data Analysis and Efficiency vs Fuel Ships Comparison

Glib Ivanov

Abstract


This paper scrutinizes the common belief that electric vessels are economically unadvantageous. To achieve this, data of most known all-electric cargo ships (available in the internet as of 2021) was gathered and missing information was estimated with due diligence, to put together a sample selection.  Sample vessels’ parameters including principal dimensions, speed and battery capacity were used to calculate their relative cargo transport efficiency. Different routes and speeds were used, as electric ships efficiency was compared to that of fuel-powered vessels. Electric ships were shown to be about 50% more profitable on short routes and equally as profitable on medium routes (if they were slow steaming), reasons being reduced crew, lower maintenance requirements and higher propulsion efficiency. However, at long routes and/or high speeds oil-powered ships currently dominate because otherwise a big part of cargo space would be allocated to transporting batteries, whose energy density is much lower than fuel among other reasons. This paper derives Electric ships design guidelines and helps make an informed decision on whether to use an electric propulsion ship on a given route.


Keywords


cargo ship; electric ship; electric; efficiency; fuel; green shipping

Full Text:

PDF

References


Engineering and Technology History Wiki, “Electric boats,” [Online]. Available: https://ethw.org/Electric_Boats. [Accessed 11 04 2021].

European Maritime Safety Agency, “Study on Electrical Energy Storage for Ships,” DNVGL, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.emsa.europa.eu/publications/item/3895-study-on-electrical-energy-storage-for-ships.html.

S. e. a. Anwar, “Towards Ferry Electrification in the Maritime Sector,” Energies, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/24/6506. [Accessed 11 04 2021].

A. G. Koumentakos, “Developments in Electric and Green Marine Ships,” MDPI, 2019.

RINA, “Bundle of Energy,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.rina.org.uk/bundle.html. [Accessed 11 04 2021].

R. S. Gurning, W. Busse and M. Lubnan, “Decision Making of Full Speed, Slow Steaming, Extra Slow Steaming and Super Slow Steaming using TOPSIS,” IJMEIR, 2017.

UK P&I Club, “Overweight container guide,” 30 04 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.ukpandi.com/news-and-resources/bulletins/2010/overweight-container-guide/. [Accessed 19 04 2021].

V.V.Ashik, Ship design, Leningrad: Sudostroeniye, 1985.

O. Solomentsev and T. B. Lee, “Selection of the coefficient of general completeness of the designed vessel taking into account the area and sailing conditions,” Collection of scientific works of the National University of Shipbuilding, pp. 16-21, 2013.

K. Kokhanovskiy and Y. Larkin, Design of multipurpose vessels for general cargo and containers, Moscow: Morflot, 1979.

L. Nogid, Design of Seagoing Ships. Vol.1. Methods of determining ship particulars., Leningrad: Sudostroeniye, 1964.

E. Gouvernal and B. Slack, “Container freight rates and economic distance: a new perspective on the world map. doi:10.1080/03088839.2011.650723,” Maritime Policy & Management, pp. 39(2), 133–149, 2012.

UNCTAD, “FREIGHT RATES AND MARITIME TRANSPORT COSTS,” Review of Maritime Transport, pp. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2017ch3_en.pdf, 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v7i1.12379

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracted / Indexed by:
      
  

 

 

 

 

 

P-ISSN: 2541-5972   

E-ISSN: 2548-1479

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

IJMEIR journal published by  Department of Marine Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia under licenced Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence. Based on https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/ijmeir/