Application Of a Combination of AHP and TOPSIS Methods in Shipyard Selection
Abstract
Choosing a shipyard that does not meet the requirements can affect ship building process. Incompatibility of construction process can cause delays in completion time or delivery of ship to shipowner. The resulting delays can affect reputation of shipowner because they cannot fulfill their cargo delivery services, where cargo contract is generally carried out before ship is handed over from shipyard to shipowner. Delays will also affect insurance providers, both ship and cargo insurance. A stricter evaluation from insurance company could result in an increase in premiums charged due to risks that will be faced in the future. The aim is to determine priority of shipyards that will be appointed for ship construction in Batam area. Because shipyard selection does not only involve quantitative but also qualitative variables, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method was used in this research. Method used in selection is a combination of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). AHP is used to determine weight of the criteria and sub-criteria used in selection, while TOPSIS is used to determine shipyard selection priorities based on weight of criteria and sub-criteria that have been generated from AHP process. Respondents in this study were representatives of three ship owners, consisting of two technical managers and one deputy general manager. Based on the results of the analysis of six shipyards in Batam area, a priority order of shipyards recommended for ship construction by company was obtained. Sensitivity analysis also shows that the results produced in shipyard selection are quite robust.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
G. Chryssolouris, S. Makris, V. Xanthakis, and D. Mourtzis, “Towards the internet-based supply chain management for the ship repair industry,” Int J Comput Integr Manuf, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 45–57, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1080/0951192031000080885.
M. Kafalı and M. Özkök, “Evaluation of shipyard selection criteria for shipowners using a fuzzy technique,” Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 146–158, 2015, doi: 10.1080/20464177.2015.1118787.
C. S. Wu, C. T. Lin, and C. Lee, “Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 190–196, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.05.013.
E. W. L. Cheng, H. Li, and L. Yu, “The analytic network process (ANP) approach to location selection: a shopping mall illustration.”
J. George, A. Singh, and A. Kumar Bhaisare, “Implementation of TOPSIS Technique for Supplier Selection FEM Analysis of a Porous Hybrid Journal Bearing Under the Turbulent Regime View project Implementation of TOPSIS Technique for Supplier Selection,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2008, [Online]. Available: www.irjet.net
H. I. Caner and C. C. Aydin, “Shipyard site selection by raster calculation method and AHP in GIS environment, İskenderun, Turkey,” Mar Policy, vol. 127, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104439.
A. S. Nooramin, J. Sayareh, M. K. Moghadam, and H. R. Alizmini, “TOPSIS and AHP techniques for selecting the most efficient marine container yard gantry crane,” OPSEARCH, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 116–132, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12597-012-0071-8.
A. P. V, “Supplier Selection in Construction Industry using AHP Integrated with TOPSIS Method: A Case study,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (An ISO, vol. 3297, 2007, doi: 10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0508117.
M. Tyagi, P. Kumar, and D. Kumar, “A hybrid approach using AHP-TOPSIS for analyzing e-SCM performance,” in Procedia Engineering, Elsevier Ltd, 2014, pp. 2195–2203. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.463.
R. Karim, C. Karmaker, and C. L. Karmaker, “Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods Customer driven quality improvement of jute yarn using AHP based QFD: A case study View project Direct Purchasing and Supply Management Decision Framework for the Grocery Supply Chain with Fixed Producers: When Quality is an issue View project Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods,” American Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2016, doi: 10.12691/ajie-4-1-2.
D. L. Olson, “Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models,” Math Comput Model, vol. 40, no. 7–8, pp. 721–727, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003.
Y. S. Huang and W. H. Li, “A Study on Aggregation of TOPSIS Ideal Solutions for Group Decision-Making,” Group Decis Negot, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 461–473, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10726-010-9218-2.
M. Esfandiari and M. Rizvandi, “An application of TOPSIS method for ranking different strategic planning methodology,” Management Science Letters, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1445–1448, 2014, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2014.6.022.
I. Chamodrakas, N. Alexopoulou, and D. Martakos, “Customer evaluation for order acceptance using a novel class of fuzzy methods based on TOPSIS,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 7409–7415, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.050.
M. Amudha, R. Manickam, and P. Anusuya, A Study on TOPSIS MCDM Techniques and Its Application Natural Silk crepe fabrics from MultiVoltaine Silk yarn Produced in India View project Review on Characterization of Poly Butyl Succinate Based Biodegradable Composites View project. [Online]. Available: http://restpublisher.com/book-series/data-analytics-and-artificial-
A. Zadeh Sarraf, A. Mohaghar, and H. Bazargani, “Developing TOPSIS method using statistical normalization for selecting knowledge management strategies,” Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 860–875, 2013, doi: 10.3926/jiem.573.
M. Ghorbani, R. Velayati, and M. M. Ghorbani, “Using Fuzzy TOPSIS to Determine Strategy Priorities by SWOT Analysis.”
V. Dixit, P. Verma, and P. Raj, “Leveraging tacit knowledge for shipyard facility layout selection using fuzzy set theory,” Expert Syst Appl, vol. 158, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113423.
M. Tukan, B. Jhones Camerling, and M. Thezar Afifudin, “ANALISA KELAYAKAN WILAYAH UNTUK PEMBANGUNAN FLOATING DOCK SEBAGAI DOK ALTERNATIF DI KEPULAUAN MALUKU MENGGUNAKAN FAHP-TOPSIS,” 2019.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v8i4.19358
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
| |||
|
|
|
|
P-ISSN: 2541-5972
E-ISSN: 2548-1479
IJMEIR journal published by Department of Marine Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia under licenced Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence. Based on https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/ijmeir/