Risk Analysis of Port Facility Security Based on the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS CODE)

Mohammad Danil Arifin

Abstract


The ISPS Code was created in response to the terrorism that occurred on September 11, 2001, in the United States. This prompted the IMO to review and draft the ISPS Code, which was then agreed to be included in the amendments to SOLAS 1974. The function of the ISPS Code is to minimize the occurrence of terrorism, piracy, cargo theft, stowaways, drug smuggling, money laundering, and other related issues. Due to the numerous incidents, particularly in Indonesia, this study reviews the security risk of the XYZ Port Facility based on the ISPS Code. These research objectives are to determine the security risk rating of the XYZ Port facility and to ascertain whether risk mitigation measures are necessary for the security facilities of XYZ Port. The method used in this research involves surveys and direct observations based on field data. The risk assessment in this study consists of three evaluations: threat, vulnerability, and impact assessment. Based on this research it can be identified that the security risk assessment of XYZ port facilities across 9 aspects revealed that 7 out of the 9 aspects have a risk rating of "Document (D)," while the remaining 2 aspects have a risk rating of "Consider (C)”. Overall, it can be concluded that the security level of XYZ's port facilities is good.


Keywords


Risk Analysis; Port Facility Security; ISPS Code

Full Text:

PDF

References


IMO. (2002). International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. International Maritime Organization. IMO Publishing.

George G. Mason. (2005). The ISPS Code: A Practical Guide. Journal of Maritime Policy & Management. Vol. 32 No 3 Pp. 297-310.

John F. Frittelli. (2004). Maritime Security and the ISPS Code: Implementation Issues and Perspectives. Journal of Transportation Law, Logistics and Policy. Vol. 71. No. 2 Pp. 165-182.

David Attard. (2004). The Implementation of the ISPS Code in the Light of the SOLAS Convention. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. Vol. 19 No. 4 Pp. 493-506.

International Crisis Group. (2019). After Sri Lanka’s Easter Bombings: Reducing Risks of Future Violence. Pp. 1-46.

Santiago Iglesias-Baniela. (2010). Piracy at Sea: Somalia an Area of Great Concern. Journal of Navigation 63(02):191 – 206. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463309990439

Piracy monthly report for March 2019 Acts of piracy and armed robbery allegedly committed against ships reported by Member States or international organizations in consultative status. Retrieved from https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Security/Documents/Piracy%20monthly%20report%20Mar%202019.pdf

D. Burges. (2013). Cargo Theft, Loss Prevention, and Supply Chain Security. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-06850-3

Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch. (2011). The strategic value of the Port of Rotterdam for the international competitiveness of the Netherlands: A first exploration. Research Report for the Port of Rotterdam Authority. RSM Erasmus University / INSCOPE ISBN: 978-90-817220-2-5

Kusi, Bernard. (2015). PORT SECURITY-Threats and Vulnerabilities. Laurea University of Applied Sciences.

Environment Report. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.portoffelixstowe.co.uk/files/7016/1133/0477/Environmental_Report_2020.pdf

EU Drug Markets Impact of COVID-19. 2020. ISBN 978-92-9497-493-8 doi:10.2810/19284

Williams, J. (2004). The Impact of the ISPS Code on the Management of Port Security. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(4), 354-368.

Notteboom, T. E., & Vernimmen, B. (2009). The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(5), 325-337.

Notteboom, T. E. (2010). From Multi-Porting to a Hub Port: The Port of Rotterdam. Research in Transportation Economics, 27(1), 35-52.

Mitchell, J. (2006). What role do security measures play in the transport of dangerous goods? Journal of Transportation Security, 1(1), 23-34.

Chunlin Liu, Chong-Kuan Tan, and Yea-Saen Fang. (2012). The Security Risk Assessment Methodology. Procedia Engineering 43:600-609. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.106




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v9i2.20570

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracted / Indexed by:
      
  

 

 

 

 

 

P-ISSN: 2541-5972   

E-ISSN: 2548-1479

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

IJMEIR journal published by  Department of Marine Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia under licenced Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence. Based on https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/ijmeir/