Composition of Shark Catches With Conservation Status in Mukomuko District, Bengkulu

panji anugrah Ramadhan; Mulyono Mulyono; Wazir Mawardi

doi:10.12962/j25481479.v9i3.20858

Composition of Shark Catches With Conservation Status in Mukomuko District, Bengkulu

panji anugrah Ramadhan, Mulyono Mulyono, Wazir Mawardi

Abstract

Mukomuko Regency is one of Bengkulu Province's regencies with abundant marine resources. It has a fishing port, one of which is the Ipuh sub-district fishing port and the Teramangjaya sub-district fishing port. This study aimed to determine the size, length, weight, and composition of shark species landed at the Mukomuko Regency fishing port to identify the types of sharks that are protected based on the IUCN conservation status and the suitability of shark catches. The survey method was used to visit the research location at the ship's landing port, measure the length and weight of the sharks, and take pictures of them. The results of the sharks obtained were two species of sharks, namely the kejen shark (Loxodon Macrorhinus) with a status of almost threatened NT, 35 were found, and the Hammerhead Shark (Sphyrna lewini) with a status of very threatened CR, 15 were found. Of all the types of sharks caught, they were still juveniles and not yet suitable for catch.

Keywords

Composition; Sharks; conservation; Loxodon Macrorhinus; Sphyrna lewini

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aditya ZF. 2017. Aditya ZF. 2017. “LEGAL PROTECTION FOR SHARKS AND STINGRAYS TO MAINTAIN THE BALANCE OF INDONESIAN MARINE ECOSYSTEMS. " Legality: Scientific Journal of Law, vol. 24, no. 2, Feb. 2017, pp.22435, https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/legality/article/view/4273

Arifiyani DM. 2014. Monitoring of Shark Species in the Working Area of the Coastal and Marine Resources Management Center, Serang, Banten. Final Activity Report. Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries.

Aulia MA. 2021. The Role of Government in Shark Protection in Indonesia. Journal of International Relations, 139 - 146.

Anon. 2012b. Capture fishery enterprises on the high seas [in Bahasa] (Ministerial Regulation No. 12/PERMEN/2012). Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Republic of Indonesia.

ACIAR. 2006. Tanjung Luar (East Lombok) longline shark fishery. Final report for project FIS/2006/142. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research, Canberra [6] Barg, C., & Robertson, C. (2019). Khaya senegalensis: Discover Khaya, the period pain reliever. Journal of the Australian - Traditional Medicine Society, 25(3), 146-149.

Bonfil R. 2002. Trends and patterns in world and Asian elasmobranch fisheries. In: Fowler SL, Reed TM, Dipper FA (eds), Elasmobranch biodiversity, conservation, and management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK: IUCN SSC Shark Specialist Group. Pp 15–24.

Cavanagh RD, Kyne PM, Fowler SL, Musick JA and Bennett MB. 2003. The conservation status of Australasian chondrichthyans: Report of the IUCN shark specialist group Australia and Oceania regional red list workshop. Queensland. Australia. 7-9 March 2003. Brisbane: The University of Queensland. School of Biomedical Sciences, 170 pp.

Daley RK, Stevens JD, Last PR, Yearsley GK. 2002. Field guide to Australian sharks and rays. Australia: CSIRO Marine Research and Development Corporation, 88 ppDharmadi, F. &. (2013). Review of the status of shark fisheries and conservation efforts in Indonesia. Directorate General of Marine, Coastal and Small Islands Affairs, 179 pp.

Ebert DA, Fowler S and Compagno L. 2013. Sharks of the World. A Fully Illustrated Guide. Wild Nature Press, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

Efendi HP. 2018. Species Diversity and Length Distribution of Sharks. Proceedings of the Indonesian National Shark and Ray Symposium, 33-42.

Ebert DA, Fowler S & Compagno L. (2013). Sharks of the World. A Fully Illustrated Guide. Wild Nature Press, Plymouth, United Kingdom.

Ferretti F, Worm B, Britten GL, Heithaus MR, Lotze HK. 2010. Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean. Ecology Letters 13: 1055–1071

Fahmi and Dharmadi. 2005. Status of Shark Fisheries and Management Aspects. Oceana. vol. 100 (1): 1-8.

Graham NA, Spalding MD, Sheppard CRC. 2010. Reef shark declines in remote atolls highlight the need for multi-faceted conservation action. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosys, 20:543-548 [16] Graham NA, Spalding MD, Sheppard CRC. 2010. Reef shark declines in remote atolls highlight the need for multi-faceted conservation action. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosys, 20:543-548.

Hoenig JM and Gruber SH. 1990. Life history patterns in elasmobranchs: implications for fisheries management. In: H.L. Pratt Jr., S.H. Gruber and T. Taniuchi (Eds). Elasmobranchs as living resources: Advances in the biology, ecology, systematics and the status of the fisheries. NOAA Technical Report 90. Pp: 1-16.

Imaniar K. 2013. Report on the results of TPI Bomb Kalianda Shark monitoring activities, South Lampung. Coastal and Marine Management Center Serang. Directorate General of Coastal Marine and Small Islands, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Serang. Serang.

Widodo AA, Widodo J. 2002. Artisanal shark fisheries are in the Indian Ocean, South of Java, and Lombok [in Bahasa]. Indonesian Fisheries Research Journal Resources and Capture 8: 75–81.

Purwanto. 2003. Status and management of the Java Sea fisheries. In: Silvestre G, Garces L, Stobutzki I, Ahmed M, Valmonte-Santos RA, Luna C, et al. (eds), Assessment, management and future directions for coastal fisheries in Asian countries. World Fish Center Conference Proceedings 67. Penang: World Fish Center. Pp 793–832.

White, W. T., P. R. Last, J. D. Stevens, G. K. Yearsley, Fahmi, and Dharmadi. 2006. Economically Important Sharks and Rays of Indonesia. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v9i3.20858