Risk Analysis of Dual Fuel Tug Ship Design in Maritime Technology Development Innovation Program – BRIN
Abstract
The problem that often occurs in the ship design process is the deviations in time and quality of results. IMO [1] regulations provide a methodology that ship design should be carried out with a risk-based probabilistic approach. This paper aims to become a source of reference information for ship design innovations in supporting efforts to increase performance optimization and efficiency. In the dual fuel tugboat design carried out in the BRIN Maritime Technology Development Innovation Program with funding from the government, the risk analysis begins with identifying and collecting data on control systems and internal controls based on existing risks, data collection on regulations, operational procedures, ship design business processes, and measuring the probability of risk occurrence. Furthermore, the level of risk is ensured by looking at the risk analysis matrix and making a risk map. The results of the analysis show that there are 3 risk events with a high-risk status that can lead to reduced quality and delays in the completion of the tugboat design, which is a skill base, experience, and the ship model test schedule.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
IMO, “Goal-based new ship construction standards. Guidelines on approval of risk-based ship design,” Maritime Safety Commitee 86th session, 2009.
“The Regulation of the State Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia, No. 38 of 2019 (In Indonesian)”.
A Bisri, Mohammad Ridwan Utina, and Dewi Kartikasari, “Final Report 2021 (In Indonesian),” Jakarta, 2021.
“The Law of the Republic of IndonesiaNumber 11 of 2019 concerning Systems National Science and Technology (In Indonesian).”
R. M. Blank and P. D. Gallagher, “NIST Special Publication 800-30 Revision 1, Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments,” 2012. [Online]. Available: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications.
T. Aven, Foundations of risk analysis: The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England.: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2003.
“A structured approach to Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and the requirements of ISO 31000.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ferma.eu/app/uploads/2011/10/a-structured-approach-to-erm.pdf
A. Kishore Eswara and E. Arun Kishore SMDR, “Formal Safety Assessment in Maritime Industry-Explanation to IMO Guidelines Formal Safety Assessment in Maritime Industry *-Explanation to IMO Guidelines †,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256471309
R. Likert, A Technique for The Measurement Of Attitudes, vol. 22. Archives of Psychology, 1932.
Charles R. Vorst, D.S. Priyarsono, and Arif Budiman, “Manajemen Risiko Berbasis SNI ISO 31000,” Jakarta, 2018.
P S Godfrey, “Control of Risk A Guide to the Systematic Management of Risk from Construction,” CIRIA, 1996.
P. E. D. Love, R. Lopez, D. J. Edwards, and Y. M. Goh, “Error begat error: Design error analysis and prevention in social infrastructure projects,” Accid Anal Prev, vol. 48, pp. 100–110, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.027.
M. Hayaty, A. Rosidi, and M. R. Arief, “Risk Assessment Dan Business Impact Analysis Sebagai Dasar Penyusunan Disaster Recovery Plan (Studi Kasus Di STMIK AMIKOM Yogyakarta),” 2013.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj25800914.v7i1.15528
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.