COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SINGLE STEEL PILE BEARING CAPACITY BETWEEN GEO5 SOFTWARE AND EMPIRICAL FORMULA METHOD

Dwi Imam Riva'i, Yudhi Lastiasih, Trihanyndio Rendy Satrya

Abstract


Abstract: Pile foundation is a part of the Sub-structure that is used to receive and distribute loads from the superstructure to the ground at a certain depth, where it requires suitable bearing capacity. Empirical formula is the one of the methods for calculating pile bearing capacity that based on Standard Penetration Test (SPT) value. This method consumes plenty of time compared with the current method using Geo 5 software. However, the pile bearing capacity results among these methods should be verified beforehand. Therefore, it is necessary to do a comparison of pile bearing capacity laid on various soil types between the empirical formula and the Geo5 program based on SPT data to obtain the value of the correction factor and to find out which method is nearest to the Geo5 software. The Luciano decourt empirical method results are closer to the Geo5 software for all soil types, both of the end bearing and floating pile conditions with ratio values of 0.90 and 1.09 for dominant clay, 0.97 and 0.96 for dominant silt, and 0.84 and 0.89 for dominant sand. As for the Bazaara Empirical Method, the results are closer to the Geo5 program for the dominant group of sand in floating pile conditions with a ratio value of 0.99. Hence, the Luciano Decourt's empirical formula is more recommended than Bazaara's empirical formula.

Keywords


Pile bearing capacity, empiris method; Geo5 program; correction factor

Full Text:

PDF

References


B. P. Jatmiko, “2020, Anggaran Infrastruktur Naik 4,9 persen jadi RP 419,2 Triliun,” KOMPAS.com, 17-Aug-2019. [Online]. Available: https://money.kompas.com/read/2019/08/17/100600926/2020-anggaran-infrastruktur-naik-4-9-persen-jadi-rp-419-2-triliun. [Accessed: 28-Feb-2021].

B. K. Publik, “Kementerian Pupr Kembangkan teknologi mortar busa sebagai solusi konstruksi infrastruktur di Tanah lunak,” e. [Online]. Available: https://eppid.pu.go.id/page/kilas_berita/1651/Kementerian-PUPR-Kembangkan-Teknologi-Mortar-Busa-sebagai-Solusi-Konstruksi-Infrastruktur-di-Tanah-Lunak. [Accessed: 1-Mar-2021].

D. P. P. Wilayah, Panduan geoteknik 1: proses pembentukan dan sifat-safat dasar tanah lunak. Pedoman Kimpraswil No: Pt T-8-2002-B. 2002

J. E. Bowles, Analisis dan Desain Pondasi Jilid 2. (Yogyakarta:Erlangga), 1998.

H. C. Hardiyatmo, Teknik Fondasi 2. (Yogyakarta:Beta Offset), 1998.

H. C. Hardiyatmo, Teknik Fondasi 1. (Jakarta:Gramedia Pustaka Utama), 1996.

Mina, Enden,”Analisis kapasitas dukung pondasi cement SILO dengan menggunakan program Geo5”. Jurnal STABILITA .vol. 7, no.1, 2016.

A. Afriyanto, Analisa perbandingan perencanaan pondasi tiang pancang menggunkan berbagai macam metode pada proyek apartemen the frontage surabaya. Undergraduate Thesis. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2017.

J. C. A. Cintra, N. Aoki, ”Fundações por estacas projeto geotécnico”. Oficina de Textos. ISBN 978-85-7975-004-5, 2010.

D. Shiananta,”Pemrograman metode interpretasi daya dukung ultimate pada hasil uji beban tiang dan usulan nilai koreksi daya dukung tiang empiris ke metode kuadratic hyperbolic”. Undergraduate Theses. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j20861206.v37i2.13694

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Journal of Civil Engineering is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats