LIVING IN A BOARDING HOUSE: A PRIVACY MECHANISM IN ARCHITECTURE STUDENT’S PRIVATE STUDY ROOM

Purwanita Setijanti, Sarah Cahyadini, Tisya Surya Narida

Abstract


Boarding houses, as a type of substitute residence, function not only to ensure the continuity of daily domestic activities, but also as a comfortable learning place for students as residents. The Multimodal learning methods, which is used in architectural studio learning, through design simulations making study mock-ups, requires the use of more than one strategy in the learning process. Because it requires a different concentration compared to unimodal students, learning privacy is not only needed for individual learning process, but also needed for group learning study activities. This research explores the privacy mechanism that occurs in boarding rooms as private workspaces for architecture students. Phenomenological qualitative methods are used, with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documents readings. The results of the study show that architecture students tend to organize to optimize space by modifying the spatial attributes. This is executed to provide the widest possible space for learning privacy, so that it’s multimodal learning activities could run as optimally as possible.


Keywords


boarding house; study activities; architecture student; privacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abeysekera, L. & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and Cognitive Load in the Flipped Classroom: Definition, Rationale and a Call for Research. High Education Research Development, 34, 1–14.

Altman, I, & Chemers, M, (1980), Culture and Environment, Monterey, Ca: Brooks/Cole.

American Institute of Architect Student (AIAS) Studio Culture Task Force. (2002). The redesign of the studio culture: A report of the AIAS studio culture task force, AIAS, Washington.

American Psychiatric Association (2013), Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (DSM-5). In American Psychiatric Association (5th ed.), Washington.

Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2016). Learning Space Preferences of Higher Education Students. Building and Environment, 104, 243-252.

Creswell, J, (2013) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches 3rd edition, CA: SAGE, Thousand Oaks.

DeMarco, Tom & Lister, Timothy. (1999) Peopleware Productive Project and Teams Second Edition. Dorset House Publishing Co., Inc. New York

Dwiyanto, A. (2008), Arsitek Profesional dan Perannya dalam Dunia Kerja, ENCLOSURE Volume 7 No. 1

Edney, J. J., & Buda, M. A. (1976). Distinguishing Territoriality and Privacy: Two Studies. Human Ecology, 4(4), 283–296. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4602378

Firzandy, H. (2016). “Style Perancang Dalam Kajian Arsitektur Berdasarkan Teori Kepribadian”, Ultimart: Jurnal Komunikasi Visual Vol 9 No 1

Halim, C.F. dan Dariyo, A. (2016). “Hubungan Psychological Well-Being dengan Loneliness pada Mahasiswa yang Merantau”, Jurnal Psikogenesis, Volume 4, No.2, Desember 2016.

Harel, NMN. (2019), Pilihan Hunian Sewa di Kalangan Mahasiswa Perantauan di Kota Surabaya, Skripsi thesis, Universitas Airlangga.

Holahan, C.J. (1982) Environmental Psychology, Random House, New York

Hutchison, Elizabeth D, (2015), Dimensions of human behavior: person and environment, SAGE Publication Inc, Thousand Oaks.

Ibrahim, N.L.N., dan Utaberta, N. (2012) ‘Learning in Architecture Design Studio’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 60 30 – 35.

King, P, (2004), Private Dwelling: Contemplating the use of housing, Routledge, New York.

Lueth, P. L. (2003). The culture of architectural design studio: A qualitative pilot study on the interaction of the instructor and the student in their culture and the identification of the instructor’s teaching styles. Master’s thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

Marshall, N. J. (1974). Dimensions of privacy preferences. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 9, 255-272.

Maulana, S. (2015). Modul Studio Perancangan Arsitektur. Universitas Medan Area

Miles, M.B., dan Huberman, A.M., (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE

Niezabitowska, E. D. (2018) Research Methods and Techniques in Architecture. Routledge.

Rachmawati, A. (2017). ‘Membangun Informasi Layanan Umum Rumah Kos Melalui Aplikasi Berbasis Web’, Jurnal Ilmiah Fifo, Volume IX/No.2.

Rahmawati, Yusi. (2017). Akar-Akar Sosiologi Penyimpangan Sosial di Kalangan Mahasiswa Kos: Studi kasus di Twin Kos Setiabudhi Kecamatan Sukasari Kota Bandung. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Rapoport, A. (2005) Culture, Architecture, and Design, Locke Science Publishing Company.

Santrock, J.W., (2002), Life-Span Development, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Sarwono, S. W. (1992). Psikologi lingkungan. Grasindo.

Setiadi, I.L., dan Choandi, M. (2019) ‘Rumah Kost Untuk Milenial’, Jurnal Stupa Vol. 1, No. 2.

Shidfar, S. (2013). “The Difference Between Dwelling and Home in Architecture”, IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 10 Issue 4 No 2.

Sundstrom, E., Burt, R. E., & Kamp, D. (1980). Privacy at Work: Architectural Correlates of Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 23(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/255498

Suryanti. (2010). Manajemen Pengelolaan Kost Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin dan Kedisiplinan Mahasiswa di Kelurahan Jebres Kecamatan Jebres Kota Surakarta Tahun 2010. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Turner, J.F.C., (1972), Freedom to Build, The Macmillan Company, New York.

Walton, G. & Matthews, G. (2018). Exploring Informal Learning Space in the University: A Collaborative Approach. Routledge




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j2355262x.v22i2.a17971

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexing and Abstracting :

         

 


Journal of Architecture & Environment is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

View JoAE Stats