INTEGRATION OF GENDER EQUALITY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION (GESI) IN PARTICIPATORY PLANNING OF INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS: CASE STUDY OF TAMMUA URBAN VILLAGE, MAKASSAR

Andi Annisa Amalia, Citra Amalia Amal, Khilda Wildana Nur, Muhammad Aldi, Hamzah Hamid, Andi Adam Sawerigading, Muhammad Alfacmy Nurawal

Abstract


RT 002 RW 004, Tammua Urban Village in Makassar City is an informal settlement with the highest level of vulnerability, characterized by high population density, irregular building structures, limited access to clean water, sanitation, and open spaces, as well as overlapping land uses among residential, industrial, and transportation areas. This study evaluates the integration of Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) principles in the participatory planning of informal settlements through a review of the Tammua Community Settlement Environmental Planning (RPLP) document. Spatial analysis was used to identify correlations between housing density, building feasibility, and access to basic infrastructure with the distribution of vulnerable groups through a GESI lens. Results indicate that the RPLP has attempted to thematically mainstream GESI using the Analysis, Participation, Control, and Benefit (APKM) framework. Thematic maps reveal spatial correlations between housing density, building feasibility, and infrastructure access with the distribution of vulnerable groups. However, participation of vulnerable communities remains limited; housing density reaches 711.11 units/ha, 82 households lack access to clean water, and drainage infrastructure is damaged over 7,359 meters. Due to inadequate sanitation, most residents still rely on dug wells for bathing, washing, and defecation. The study concludes that the integration of GESI in participatory planning in Tammua needs improvement, particularly in substantially involving vulnerable groups, creating adaptive spatial designs, and equitably distributing infrastructure to realize adequate, resilient, and equitable urban housing conditions.


Keywords


Informal Settlements; Gender Equality; Social Inclusion; Vulnerable Groups; Urban Infrastructure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adiputra, M. S., Rustiadi, E., & Pravitasari, A. E. (2022). Pola Sebaran Permukiman Kumuh di Kabupaten Tangerang dan Keragaman Spasial Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 6(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2022.6.2.146-164

Aditya, T. (2010). Usability Issues in Applying Participatory Mapping for Neighborhood Infrastructure Planning. Transactions in Gis, 14(s1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01206.x

Amalia, A. A. (2018). KARAKTERISTIK HUNIAN PERMUKIMAN KUMUH KAMPUNG SAPIRIA KELURAHAN LEMBO KOTA MAKASSAR. https://doi.org/10.24252/nature.v5i1a2

Amalia, A. A., & Fuadillah, S. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Keteraturan Bangunan Hunian Kelurahan Kampung Buyang Kota Makassar. Journal of Green Complex Engineering, 1(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.59810/greenplexresearch.v1i2.93

Amalia, A. A., & Ikaputra, I. (2024). Tinjauan Literatur: Informalitas Permukiman Informal Perkotaan. Jurnal Linears, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-linears.v7i1.14344

Arif, M. M., Ahsan, M., Devisch, O., & Schoonjans, Y. (2022). Integrated Approach to Explore Multidimensional Urban Morphology of Informal Settlements: The Case Studies of Lahore, Pakistan. Sustainability, 14(13), 7788. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137788

Budiyanto, H. (2011). Pendampingan dalam proses perencanaan partisipatif program penataan lingkungan permukiman berbasis komunitas. Local Wisdom-Jurnal Ilmiah Online, III, 34–40.

Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6

Chidya, R., Holm, R. H., Tembo, M., Cole, B., Workneh, P. S., & Kanyama, J. (2016). Testing Methods for New Pit Latrine Designs in Rural and Peri-Urban Areas of Malawi Where Conventional Testing Is Difficult to Employ. Environmental Science Water Research & Technology, 2(4), 726–732. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ew00246j

Chigbu, U. E., & Onyebueke, V. U. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic in informal settlements: (Re)considering urban planning interventions. Town Planning Review, 92(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.74

Chigudu, A. (2021). Planning and Design as Defining Parameters for Urban Resilience: The Case of Zimbabwe BT - Resilience and Sustainability in Urban Africa: Context, Facets and Alternatives in Zimbabwe (I. Chirisa & A. Chigudu, Eds.; pp. 55–68). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3288-4_4

Djodding, I. M. (2020). PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PENATAAN PERMUKIMAN KUMUH DI KELURAHAN BONTODURI KECAMATAN TAMALATE KOTA MAKASSAR.

Douglas, G. C. C. (2016). The formalities of informal improvement: Technical and scholarly knowledge at work in do-it-yourself urban design. Journal of Urbanism, 9(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2015.1029508

Gouverneur, D. (2014). Planning and Design for Future Informal Settlements. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315765938

Hamdan, A. D., & Sumartinah, H. R. (2021). Aplikasi Participatory Design pada Rancangan Permukiman Sepanjang Rel Stasiun Sidotopo. Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS, 9(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373520.v9i2.57161

Harisun, E., Conoras, M. A. M., & Darwis, M. (2019). IDENTIFIKASI DAN PENANGANAN KAWASAN KUMUH PADA KELURAHAN MAKASSAR TIMUR. TECHNO: JURNAL PENELITIAN, 8(1), 259. https://doi.org/10.33387/tk.v8i1.979

Iannillo, A., & Fasolino, I. (2021). Land-use mix and urban sustainability: Benefits and indicators analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313460

Idris, M. Y. (2019). Arahan pengembangan kawasan permukiman berkelanjutan di Kawasan Pesisir Kota Makassar [Thesis, IPB (Bogor Agricultural University)]. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/120428

International Development Partners Group. (2017). A Common Framework for Gender Equality & Social Inclusion. GESI Working Group Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Working Group, International Development Partners Group, Nepal.

Kim, J., Hagen, E., Muindi, Z., Mbonglou, G., & Laituri, M. (2022). An examination of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) accessibility and opportunity in urban informal settlements during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Nairobi, Kenya. Science of the Total Environment, 823, 153398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153398

Walsh, E.A., 2018. White fragility as an obstacle to anti-racist resilience planning: Opportunities for equity-conscious partnerships. Journal of Urban Management, 7(3), pp.181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2020.12.002

Mitlin, D., & Weldeghebrael, E. H. (2025). The contribution of urban reform coalitions to inclusive and equitable cities. E N V I RON M E N T, 37(1).

Nelly, S. (2021). Gender Equality and Social Inclusion (GESI) in Village Development. 10(2).

Prasetyo, I., Suryawan, M. B., & Indah, I. L. (2021). Rancang Bangun Sistem Penguncian dan Pendeteksi Kebakaran Dini Pada Ruang dengan Kendali Android Menggunakan Arduino. In CAHAYAtech (Vol. 9, Issue 2). Cahaya Surya. https://doi.org/10.47047/ct.v9i2.112

Rigon, A. (2022). (PDF) Diversity, justice and slum upgrading: An intersectional approach to urban development. Habitat International, 130 (2022) 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102691

Robertson, T., & Simonsen, J. (2012). Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Participatory Design. Design Issues, 28(3), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00157

Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. eds., 2013. Routledge international handbook of participatory design (Vol. 711). New York: Routledge. http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415694407/

Roy, A. (2009a). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099299

Roy, A. (2009b). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099299

Rudianto, I., Syafri, S., & Rasyidi, E. S. (2024). Analisis Kawasan Permukiman Kumuh DAS Jeneberang Kota Makassar. Urban and Regional Studies Journal, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35965/ursj.v7i1.5502

Rumata, N. A., Ilma, N., Janna, N. M., & Nurdin, L. (2023). KAJIAN TINGKAT KEKUMUHAN KAWASAN PERMUKIMAN DI KAWASAN BONTORANNU KOTA MAKASSAR. Journal of Green Complex Engineering, 1(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.59810/greenplexresearch.v1i1.39

Sanoff, H. (2010). Multiple views in Particpatory Design. Focus, VII(2), 11–21.

Satterthwaite, D., & Mitlin, D. (2013). Reducing Urban Poverty in the Global South. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203104330

Sawira, S., & Rahman, T. (2018). An observation on the quality of interfaces in order to understand the complexity and coherence of informal settlement: A study on Tamansari Kampung in Bandung. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 158(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012002

Shatkin, G. (2004). Planning to Forget: Informal Settlements as “Forgotten Places” in Globalising Metro Manila. In Urban Studies (Vol. 41, Issue 12, pp. 2469–2484). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980412331297636

Soliman, A. M., & Soliman, Y. A. (2022). Exposing urban sustainability transitions: Urban expansion in Alexandria , Egypt. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 14(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2022.2056894

Sucahyo, H., & Pradoto, W. (2020). Pengaruh Regenerasi Kota Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman Industri Kecil Batik Studi Kasus: Kawasan Pabean, Kota Pekalongan. Jurnal Planologi, 17(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.30659/jpsa.v17i2.7951

Turner, J. C. (1967). Barriers and Channels for Housing Development in Modernizing Countries. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366708977912

UNDP Indonesia. (2025). Indikator SDG — Indikator SDG. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/?

Vainio, T. (2016). Motivations, Results and the Role of Technology in Participatory Design Research During 2000’s – A Review in the Field of Architecture and Urban Planning. Architecture and Urban Planning, 11(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/aup-2016-0002

Victor, C., Vega Ocasio, D., Cumbe, Z. A., Garn, J. V., Hubbard, S., Mangamela, M., McGunegill, S., Nalá, R., Snyder, J. S., Levy, K., & Freeman, M. C. (2022). Spatial heterogeneity of neighborhood-level water and sanitation access in informal urban settlements: A cross-sectional case study in Beira, Mozambique. PLOS Water, 1(6), e0000022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000022

Yeboah, V., Asibey, M. O., & Abdulai, A.-S. J. (2021). Slum upgrading approaches from a social diversity perspective in the global south: Lessons from the Brazil, Kenya and Thailand cases. Cities, 113, 103164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103164




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj2355262x.v24i2.a20151

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexing and Abstracting :

           

 


Journal of Architecture & Environment is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

 

View JoAE Stats