CONCEPT OF ORNAMENTATION BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS IN THE URBAN AREA OF TAKENGON
Abstract
The Gayonese, an ethnic group indigenous to the highland regions of Aceh, are distinguished by their rich cultural heritage. Their cultural patrimony is characterized by a diversity of artistic expressions, including ornamental designs that embody the community's local wisdom and cultural identity. Takengon, the most vibrant town in Aceh's highland region, is home to numerous public buildings, including governmental, religious, educational, hospitality, and other service facilities, which incorporate ornamental elements as expressions of local wisdom. However, the application of these ornaments varies significantly by placement, symbolism, and color due to the absence of standardized guidelines for their implementation in public architecture. The main objectives of this research are twofold. Firstly, to examine the prevailing patterns of ornamentation in public buildings from a semiotic perspective. Secondly, grouping in local wisdom to develop a comprehensive framework for the systematic integration of ornamentation within Takengon's architectural landscape. This research employs a qualitative approach with semiotic analysis to interpret the visual symbols and meanings of ornamentation in public buildings, aiming to reveal the cultural and symbolic values embedded within. The methods of data collection employed involve the observation of ten public buildings, documenting, and interviewing informants. The informants in this research were government officials, cultural or community leaders, building consultants, and academics. The findings reveal the placement of ornamentation typically occurs in three main zones: the head, body, and base of the building. In terms of ornament typology, natural motifs are predominant, surpassing geometric and floral patterns, with no representations of fauna identified among the ten sampled buildings. Ornamentation in Takengon's public buildings primarily serves a decorative purpose, classified as applied ornamentation, rather than fulfilling structural or constructive functions. The contribution of this research lies in its enrichment of the discourse on cultural identity in the built environment, particularly in relation to ornamentation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chandler, D. (2007) Semiotics: The Basics. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Cheris, R., Ramadhani, T. and Masrul, W. (2022) ‘Muslimah Center Pekanbaru Dengan Konsep Pendekatan Arsitektur Analogi Simbolik’, Jurnal Arsitektur: Arsitektur Melayu Dan Lingkungan, 9(1), pp. 14–24.
Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2016) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dafrina, A. et al. (2022) ‘Kajian Makna Ornamen Dan Makna Warna Ornamen Umah Pitu Ruang (Studi Kasus Umah Pitu Ruang Di Desa Kemili, Aceh Tengah)’, Arsitekno, 9(1), pp. 1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29103/arj.v9i1.6262.
Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Aceh Tengah (2022) Data Kependudukan Kabupaten Aceh Tengah Tahun 2022. Takengon.
Eco, U. (1986) ‘Function and sign: The semiotics of architecture’, in Leach, N. Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
Firmansyah, R.A., Rachmawati, M. and Defiana, I. (2023) ‘Identity Meaning of a Gapura Wringinlawang at the Hinduism-Semeru Lumajang Temple’, Journal of Architecture & Environment, 22(1), pp. 25–32.
Gustami, S.P. (2008) Nukilan Seni Ornamen Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Arindo Nusa Media.
Handoko, J.P.S. (2024) ‘- semiotics analysis method in architectural research’, Jurnal Koridor, 15(2), pp. 112–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32734/koridor.v15i2.14732.
Haryanto, E.S. (2010) ‘Bentuk, Struktur dan Makna Ragam Hias Singep Tumpangsari Ruang Pendapa Hotel Sahid Kusuma’, Pendhapa [Preprint], (1).
Jauhar, M., Setijanti, P. and Hayati, A. (2020) ‘Revitalization of Cultural Heritage Area with Sustainable Tourism Approach: Case Study: Tindoi Fort, Kabupaten Wakatobi’, Journal of Architecture & Environment, 19(2), pp. 81–90.
Lulu, D. and Pintong, S. (2024) ‘The Research on Characteristics and Transmission of Traditional Residential Architectural Ornamentation from a Semiotic Perspective :A Case Study of Tongyang Old Street in Chaohu of Anhui Province’, Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 9(12), pp. 2033–2046.
Mahara, M. and Misgiya, M. (2020) ‘Analisis Ornamen Kerawang Gayo Pada Rumah Adat Pitu Ruang Kabupaten Aceh Tengah’, MAVIS: Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual, 2, pp. 47–54.
Mappajaya, A., Nuffida, N.E. and Rachmawati, M. (2019) ‘Architecture as Identification of Place: The Case of Joglo Kampung Ketandan Surabaya’, Journal of Architecture & Environment, 18(2), pp. 75–84.
Peirce, C.S. (1992) ‘The Essential Peirce’, in Selected Philosophical Writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1893–1913.
Pemerintah Aceh (2023) Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 13 Tahun 2023 tentang Arsitektur Aceh yang berkarakter budaya. Indonesia.
Pirdaus, E. and Anisa, A. (2021) ‘Kajian Konsep Arsitektur Simbolik Pada Pondok Pesantren’, Journal of Architectural Design and Development (JAD), 2(1), pp. 64–76.
Prijotomo, J. (1995) ‘Arsitektur Biak’, in Proceeding for Nusantarian Architecture’, Change and Continuity [Preprint].
Putra, R.A. and Ekomadyo, A.S. (2023) ‘Transformation of architecture of rumoh Aceh: An encoding process through semiotic’, Local Wisdom, 15(1), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26905/lw.v15i1.7632.
Rapoport, A. (1969) House, Form and Culture, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3331293.
Sabatari, W. (2011) ‘Motif Hias Geometris Sajian Khusus Seni Ornamen Indonesia’, Prosiding Pendidikan Teknik Boga Busana’, 6.
Salihin, A., Juned, S. and Dharsono, D. (2019) ‘Motif Ukiran Kerawang Gayo Pada Rumah Adat Gayo Di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah Provinsi Aceh’, Jurnal Seni Rupa, 8(1), pp. 68–79.
Sari, F.D., Pratama, H.N. and Setiawan, I. (2020) ‘Identifikasi Umah Adat Pitu Ruang sebagai Produk Kebudayaan Gayo: Studi Kasus Umah Reje Baluntara di Aceh Tengah’, Jurnal Seni Rupa, 9(2), pp. 451–454.
Saussure, F. et al. (2020) Course in General Linguistics.
Soekiman, D. (2000) ‘Kebudayaan Indis dan Gaya Hidup Masyarakat Pendukungnya di Jawa’, Abad XVIII-Medio Abad XX [Preprint].
Sugiyono (2013) Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. 19th ed. Bandung: ALFABETA.
Tangirerung, J.R. (2017) Berteologi melalui simbol-simbol: Upaya mengungkap makna Injil dalam ukiran Toraja. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Warni, T. (2015) Makna simbolis ornamen praba dan tlacapan pada bangunan Kraton Yogyakarta. Undergraduate Thesis. Universitas Negeri Yograkarta.
Yanti, R.S., Arafat, P. and Wulandari, E. (2023) ‘Kajian Karakteristik Lanskap Umah Pitu Ruang (UPR) Umah Edet Reje Baluntara di Desa Toweren Uken Kecamatan Lut Tawar Kabupaten Aceh Tengah’, Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 15(2), pp. 127–135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29244/jli.v15i2.44561.
Yin, R.K. (2017) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Zulfikri, Z. et al. (2023) ‘Morphology and Facade Study of Umah Pitu Ruang (Case Study: Umah Edet Reje Baluntara in Toweren Village)’, Aceh Tengah), 21(2), pp. 195–206.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj2355262x.v24i2.a22928
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexing and Abstracting :

Journal of Architecture & Environment is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
 



 
 


