SPATIAL HARMONIZATION THROUGH BIOPHILIC TRANSITIONAL SPACES MULTI-STAGE SENIOR HOUSING ANALYSIS STUDY
Abstract
In Indonesia, developing senior housing often takes multiple years because of financial constraints and the lack of a comprehensive plan. While this strategy allows for a stepwise improvement in the available infrastructure, it may lead to disjointed spatial configurations and uneven quality in the surrounding environment. In many cases, the absence of adequate transitional spaces has been shown to result in limited accessibility, reduced social interaction among senior residents, and weak visual and physical connections to the outside space. This study explores the role of biophilic-based transitional spaces in supporting spatial integration and improving the environmental quality of gradually developed senior housing. A case study was conducted at the Wisma Lansia Harapan Asri in Semarang. Qualitative spatial analysis was conducted through phenomenological observation to capture environmental experience. Transitional areas play an instrumental role in providing linkages between residential blocks, circulation zones, and external environments. Designing micro gardens, corridor recesses, courtyard social gardens, and gardens as buffers reinforce spatial continuity while balancing enclosure and social permeability. Such evidence has helped evaluate and refine spatial design principles in multiple housing types, including pavilions and class-setting units, aimed at improving the ambience, comfort and psychosocial health of senior residents. Design recommendations for pavilion and class-setting units refine these principles, offering flexible, non-technical criteria for architects to improve ambience comfort and psychosocial health. By addressing user experiences and environmental quality, biophilic transitional spaces enable stepwise infrastructure improvements without compromising livability, providing a model for adaptable senior housing designs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ang, S.K. (2013) ‘Health and ageing’, Brunei International Medical Journal, 9(2), pp. 141–143. doi: 10.3280/we2018-002002.
Arifuddin (2016) ‘Cultural and needs-based housing development case study: The Bugis community in Makassar City’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, pp. 300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.075.
Carstens, D.Y. (1993) Site planning and design for the elderly: Issues, guidelines, and alternatives. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, Y. et al. (2025) ‘Indoor comfort domains and well-being of older adults in residential settings: A scoping review’, Building and Environment, 267, p. 112268. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112268.
Coolen, H. (2016) The meaning of dwelling features.
Creswell, J.W. and Clark, V.L.P. (2017) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Daeng, H. (2000) Manusia, kebudayaan, dan lingkungan: Tinjauan antropologis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Denzin, N.K. (2008) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2017) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Fallah Tafti, F., Rollo, J. and McGann, S. (2026) ‘Conceptualising a model for understanding socio-cultural and spatial factors in housing: Insights from a systematic scoping review’, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 15(1), pp. 119–143. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2025.05.005.
Feng, I. et al. (2018) ‘Assessment of and improvement strategies for the housing of healthy elderly: Improving quality of life’, Sustainability, 10(3), p. 722. doi: 10.3390/su10030722.
Fernández-Portero, C., Alarcón, D. and Barrios Padura, Á. (2017) ‘Dwelling conditions and life satisfaction of older people through residential satisfaction’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.11.003.
Field, A. (2018) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: SAGE Publications.
Froehlich-Grobe, K. et al. (2008) ‘Physical access in urban public housing facilities’, Disability and Health Journal, 1(1), pp. 25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2007.11.003.
Gitlin, L.N. (2003) ‘Next steps in home modification and assistive technology research’, in Impact of technology on successful aging. pp. 188–202.
Gray, M. (2017) ‘Applied qualitative research design: A total framework approach’.
Gutman, J. (2012) ‘Categorization processes’, 46(2), pp. 60–72.
Hanley, I. and Hodge, J. (1984) Psychological approaches to the care of the elderly. London: Croom Helm.
Jaul, E. and Barron, J. (2017) ‘Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population’, Frontiers in Public Health, 5, p. 335.
Kopec, D. (2018) Environmental psychology for design. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Kristiadi, A. and Sabatini, S.N. (2025) ‘Elderly behavior setting to responding eruption disaster at the Tresna Werdha Social Service Center, Pakembinangun’, Journal of Architecture & Environment, 24(2), pp. 203–222.
Lang, J. (1987) Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Loo, B.P.Y. et al. (2017) ‘Walking, neighbourhood environment and quality of life among older people’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 25, pp. 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.005.
Nriagu, J., Smith, P. and Socier, D. (2011) ‘A rating scale for housing-based health hazards’, Science of the Total Environment, 409(24), pp. 5423–5431. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.018.
Ping, Y. and Xiaohua, W. (2012) ‘Risk factors for accidental falls in the elderly and intervention strategy’, Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA, 27(5), pp. 299–305. doi: 10.1016/S1000-1948(12)60039-2.
Qin, B. et al. (2024) ‘Understanding the relationship between neighbourhood built environment and older adults’ health from the perspective of housing differentiation’, Health & Social Care in the Community, 2024(1), p. 3065803. doi: 10.1155/2024/3065803.
Rapoport, A. (1983) ‘Development, culture change and supportive design’, Habitat International, 7(5), pp. 249–268. doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(83)90076-0.
Rapoport, A. (2005) Culture, architecture, and design. Chicago: Locke Science Publishing Company.
Rives Bogart, K. and Matsumoto, D. (2010) ‘Facial mimicry is not necessary to recognize emotion: Facial expression recognition by people with Moebius syndrome’, Social Neuroscience, 5(2), pp. 241–251.
Rudwiarti, L.A. and Vitasurya, V.R. (2020) ‘Contributing social safety and security for elderly-friendly environment: Case study of Brayut Tourism Village, Yogyakarta, Indonesia’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 452(1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012077.
Sakinah, P.N., Hayati, A. and Faqih, M. (2023) Continuity of housing expression based on the elderly Bugis culture. Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Salim, A., Salik, Y. and Wekke, I.S. (2018) ‘Pendidikan karakter dalam masyarakat Bugis’, Ijtimaiyya: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 11(1), pp. 41–62.
Spradley, J.P. (2016) The ethnographic interview. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Van Swearingen, J.M. et al. (1998) ‘Psychological distress’, Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 118(6), pp. 790–796. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70270-0.
World Health Organization (WHO) (1998) WHO report.
Xian, G.E. and Defiana, I. (2023) ‘Place ideal for aging care: Detached house wellbeing’, Journal of Architecture & Environment, 22(2), pp. 225–236.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj2355262x.v25i1.a23500
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexing and Abstracting :

Journal of Architecture & Environment is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License






