Salah satu masalah perumahan di Indonesia adalah kemudahan akses terhadap perumahan terjangkau bagi masyarakat berpenghasilan rendah, terutama di kota-kota besar seperti Surabaya. Untuk memenuhi kebutuhan akan hunian, rumah susun sederhana sewa (rsunawa) digagas sebagai solusi dari permasalahan hunian untuk masyarakat berpenghasilan rendah (MBR). MBR dapat menyewa rusunawa yang dimaksudkan sebagai tempat tinggal yang bersifat temporer sebagaimana dicantumkan dalam pasal 2 Peraturan Walikota Surabaya No. 83 Tahun 2022. Walaupun Rusunawa bersifat temporer, masih banyak dari penghuni yang telah menghuni Rusunawa hingga puluhan tahun. Ini tidak selaras dengan teori housing career yang menyatakan perubahan dalam hidup individu dapat memengaruhi keputusan berpindah. Penelitian dilakukan untuk mencari faktor yang signifikan mempengaruhi housing career penghuni Rusunawa dan memodelkannya. Menggunakan metode partial least square (PLS) sebagai alat analisis, didapatkan hasil empat variabel berperan signifikan dalam menentukan keputusan penghuni untuk pindah dari Rusunawa yaitu variabel sumber daya, gaya hidup, pasar perumahan, dan kebijakan.

F. O’Mahony, “Meanings of Home,” Int. Encycl. Hous. HomeHousing Home, pp. 231–239, 2012.

D. R. Hanifa, G. Yudana, and E. F. Rini, “Backlog kepenghunian rumah di Kota Surakarta dan faktor yang mempengaruhinya,” Reg. J. Pembang. Wil. dan Perenc. Partisipatif, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 407, 2022, doi: 10.20961/region.v17i2.43366.

C. Susilawati and S. Yakobus, “New affordable strata title housing solutions : a case study in Surabaya, Indonesia,” 2010.

A. Z. Firdaus and M. Rahdriawan, “Faktor-Faktor Tempat Tinggal Bagi Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah Di Kelurahan Pudak Payung,” Tek. PWK (Perencanaan Wil. Kota), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 180–192, 2021, doi: 10.14710/tpwk.2021.31873.

UN-Habitat, Housing the poor in Asian Cities: Housing Finance. 2008.

J. O’Donnell, “Does social housing reduce homelessness? A multistate analysis of housing and homelessness pathways,” Hous. Stud., vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1702–1728, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02673037.2018.1549318.

R. Irvanda and P. Navitas, “Konsep Revitalisasi Rusunawa Sombo Berdasarkan Persepsi Penghuni,” J. Tek. ITS, vol. 11, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v11i2.96485.

M. Abramsson, “Housing careers,” International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, vol. 3. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 385–389, 2012. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00635-4.

K. A. Kholodilin and S. Kohl, “Rent Price Control – Yet Another Great Equalizer of Economic Inequalities? Evidence from a Century of Historical Data,” SSRN Electron. J., 2021, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3778550.

A. Oust, “The removal of rent control and its impact on search and mismatching costs: evidence from Oslo,” Int. J. Hous. Policy, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 433–453, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2017.1336876.

S. Maslova and R. King, “Residential trajectories of high-skilled transnational migrants in a global city: Exploring the housing choices of Russian and Italian professionals in London,” Cities, vol. 96, no. August 2019, p. 102421, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102421.

O. Causa and J. Pichelmann, “Should I stay or should I go? Housing and residential mobility across OECD countries,” Econ. Dep. Work. Pap., no. 1626, 2020.

J. Mikolai, “Divorce, Separation, and Housing Changes: A Multiprocess Analysis of Longitudinal Data from England and Wales,” Demogr. 55, pp. 83–106, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0640-9.

R. Coulter, “Parental background and housing outcomes in young adulthood,” Hous. Stud., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 201–223, 2018, doi: 10.1080/02673037.2016.1208160.

A. Hasanawi, “Housing Career dan Residental Mobility di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Kota Bandung,” Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/40741

Y. Rosa, “Housing Careers di Indonesia, Studi Kasus Kota Bandung,” J. Permukim., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 158, 2014, doi: 10.31815/jp.2014.9.158-168.

S. Faradisa, P. G. Ariastita, and F. Septanaya, “Tipologi Rumah Susun Sederhana Sewa,” J. Tek. ITS, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 2–7, 2020.

C. Jhantasana, “Should A Rule of Thumb be used to Calculate PLS-SEM Sample Size,” Asia Soc. Issues, vol. 16, no. 5, p. e254658, 2023, doi: 10.48048/asi.2023.254658.

N. Kock and P. Hadaya, “Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 227–261, 2018, doi: 10.1111/isj.12131.

J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2011, doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.

Y. Q. Mondiana, H. Pramoedyo, and E. Sumarminingsih, “Structural Equation Modeling on Likert Scale Data With Transformation by Successive Interval Method and With No Transformation,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 398–405, 2018, doi: 10.29322/ijsrp.8.5.2018.p7751.

S. Tehseen, Z. H. Qureshi, F. Johara, and R. Thurasamy, “Assessing perceived business success as a reflective-formative (Type II) second-order construct using PLS-SEM approach,” J. Sustain. Sci. Manag., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 84–114, 2019.

J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM),” no. September 2021, 2022.

C. Burke, S. B. Mackenzie, P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, and P. M. Podsakoff, “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research,” J. Consum. Res., vol. Vol. 30, N, pp. 199–218, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/376806