A Systematic Review of Participatory Approaches in Flood Risk Management: Methods and Applications

Gita Rama Mahardhika; Adjie Pamungkas

doi:10.12962/j2716179X.v19i0.20828

A Systematic Review of Participatory Approaches in Flood Risk Management: Methods and Applications

Gita Rama Mahardhika, Adjie Pamungkas

Abstract

Flood risk management (FRM) increasingly integrates participatory approaches to enhance resilience and effectiveness by engaging local communities and stakeholders. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 22 peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2024, highlighting the tools, stakeholders, levels of participation, outcomes, and challenges associated with participatory FRM. The review identifies key engagement tools such as participatory mapping, community workshops, and digital platforms, noting their varied effectiveness in different contexts. Stakeholder involvement spans residents, government agencies, and NGOs, with diverse contributions enhancing the contextual relevance and acceptance of FRM strategies. Levels of participation range from consultative to collaborative and fully empowering, with higher engagement linked to more resilient and adaptive outcomes, albeit requiring more resources and time. Outcomes demonstrate that participatory approaches improve community preparedness, enhance flood management plans, and integrate local knowledge effectively. However, challenges persist, including resource constraints, stakeholder conflicts, and communication barriers, necessitating adaptive management and innovative engagement strategies. The findings underscore the need for policymakers and practitioners to prioritize participatory methods to develop inclusive and robust FRM frameworks. Future research should focus on scalable participatory models, the integration of advanced technologies, and the evaluation of long-term impacts on community resilience, providing a roadmap for the enhanced application of participatory approaches in diverse contexts.

Keywords

participatory approaches, flood risk management, stakeholder engagement, community resilience, systematic review

Full Text:

PDF

References

T. M. Ferreira, Recent Advances in the Assessment of Flood Risk in Urban Areas. 2021.

H. M. M. Herath and N. T. S. Wijesekera, “Development of a Conceptual Framework to Operationalize the Flood Risk Management,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 563, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/563/1/012020.

S. A. Maskrey, N. J. Mount, C. R. Thorne, and I. Dryden, “Participatory modelling for stakeholder involvement in the development of flood risk management intervention options,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 82, pp. 275–294, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.027.

M. Pelling, “Learning from others: The scope and challenges for participatory disaster risk assessment,” Disasters, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 373–385, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01014.x.

J. Mercer, I. Kelman, K. Lloyd, and S. Suchet-Pearson, “Reflections on use of participatory research for disaster risk reduction,” Area, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 172–183, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00797.x.

M. R. Furqon, I. F. A. Talib, A. Mariany, and N. R. Hanifa, “Participatory disaster risk assessment (PDRA): A case study on community-based disaster risk reduction in Kelurahan Cigadung (RW09 and RW14), Kota Bandung, Indonesia,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1987, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5047337.

D. Adams, “Publish or Perish on Microsoft Windows,” Harzing.com, 2016. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish/windows.

D. W. C. Naku and S. Afrane, “Local Community Development and the Participatory Planning Approach: A Review of Theory and Practice,” Curr. Res. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 185–191, 2013, doi: 10.19026/crjss.5.5554.

A. Martin and J. Sherington, “Participatory research methods - Implementation, effectiveness and institutional context,” Agric. Syst., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 195–216, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00007-3.

E. Prins, “The Challenges of Fostering Community Participation: A Case Study of a Community-Based Organization in Rural California,” Community Dev., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 15–34, 2005, doi: 10.1080/15575330509490173.

T. A. Smucker, D. J. Campbell, J. M. Olson, and E. E. Wangui, “Contemporary challenges of participatory field research for land use change analyses: Examples from Kenya,” Field methods, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 384–406, 2007, doi: 10.1177/1525822X07302137.

A. Perrone, A. Inam, R. Albano, J. Adamowski, and A. Sole, “A participatory system dynamics modeling approach to facilitate collaborative flood risk management: A case study in the Bradano River (Italy),” J. Hydrol., vol. 580, no. November 2019, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124354.

F. O. Odemerho, “Building climate change resilience through bottom-up adaptation to flood risk in Warri, Nigeria,” Environ. Urban., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 139–160, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0956247814558194.

H. Mees et al., “Coproducing flood risk management through citizen involvement: Insights from cross-country comparison in Europe,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 21, no. 3, 2016, doi: 10.5751/ES-08500-210307.

A. Almoradie et al., “Current flood risk management practices in Ghana: Gaps and opportunities for improving resilience,” J. Flood Risk Manag., vol. 13, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12664.

W. Medema, A. Furber, J. Adamowski, Q. Zhou, and I. Mayer, “Exploring the potential impact of serious games on social learning and stakeholder collaborations for transboundary watershed management of the St. Lawrence river basin,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 8, no. 5, 2016, doi: 10.3390/w8050175.

L. H. Geaves and E. C. Penning-Rowsell, “Flood Risk Management as a public or a private good, and the implications for stakeholder engagement,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 55, pp. 281–291, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.004.

B. Sy, C. Frischknecht, H. Dao, D. Consuegra, and G. Giuliani, “Flood hazard assessment and the role of citizen science,” J. Flood Risk Manag., vol. 12, no. October 2018, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12519.

M. A. Rakib, S. Islam, I. Nikolaos, M. Bodrud-Doza, and M. A. H. Bhuiyan, “Flood vulnerability, local perception and gender role judgment using multivariate analysis: A problem-based ‘participatory action to Future Skill Management’ to cope with flood impacts,” Weather Clim. Extrem., vol. 18, no. November, pp. 29–43, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2017.10.002.

A. Serra-Llobet, E. Conrad, and K. Schaefer, “Governing for integrated water and flood risk management: Comparing top-down and bottom-up approaches in Spain and California,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 8, no. 10, 2016, doi: 10.3390/w8100445.

R. Giordano, A. Pagano, I. Pluchinotta, R. O. del Amo, S. M. Hernandez, and E. S. Lafuente, “Modelling the complexity of the network of interactions in flood emergency management: The Lorca flash flood case,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 95, pp. 180–195, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.026.

T. Thaler and M. Levin-Keitel, “Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management-A question of roles and power: Lessons from England,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 55, pp. 292–301, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.007.

U. Wehn, M. Rusca, J. Evers, and V. Lanfranchi, “Participation in flood risk management and the potential of citizen observatories: A governance analysis,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 48, pp. 225–236, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.017.

H. J. Henriksen, M. J. Roberts, P. van der Keur, A. Harjanne, D. Egilson, and L. Alfonso, “Participatory early warning and monitoring systems: A Nordic framework for web-based flood risk management,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 31, no. February, pp. 1295–1306, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.038.

C. Dieperink, D. L. T. Hegger, M. H. N. Bakker, Z. W. Kundzewicz, C. Green, and P. P. J. Driessen, “Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review,” Water Resour. Manag., vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 4467–4481, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7.

J. Batica and P. Gourbesville, “Resilience in Flood Risk Management - A New Communication Tool,” Procedia Eng., vol. 154, pp. 811–817, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.411.

R. H. Bark, J. Martin-Ortega, and K. A. Waylen, “Stakeholders’ views on natural flood management: Implications for the nature-based solutions paradigm shift?,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 115, no. July 2020, pp. 91–98, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.018.

M. S. Attems, T. Thaler, K. A. W. Snel, P. Davids, T. Hartmann, and S. Fuchs, “The influence of tailored risk communication on individual adaptive behaviour,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 49, p. 101618, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101618.

C. Begg, I. Callsen, C. Kuhlicke, and I. Kelman, “The role of local stakeholder participation in flood defence decisions in the United Kingdom and Germany,” J. Flood Risk Manag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 180–190, 2018, doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12305.

H. Mees, M. Alexander, M. Gralepois, P. Matczak, and H. Mees, “Typologies of citizen co-production in flood risk governance,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 89, no. August, pp. 330–339, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.011.

A. Inam, J. Adamowski, J. Halbe, and S. Prasher, “Using causal loop diagrams for the initialization of stakeholder engagement in soil salinity management in agricultural watersheds in developing countries: A case study in the Rechna Doab watershed, Pakistan,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 152, pp. 251–267, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.052.

U. Pasquier, R. Few, M. C. Goulden, S. Hooton, Y. He, and K. M. Hiscock, “‘We can’t do it on our own!’—Integrating stakeholder and scientific knowledge of future flood risk to inform climate change adaptation planning in a coastal region,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 103, no. November 2019, pp. 50–57, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.016.

R. Rustinsyah, R. A. Prasetyo, and M. Adib, “Social capital for flood disaster management: Case study of flooding in a village of Bengawan Solo Riverbank, Tuban, East Java Province,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 52, no. January 2020, p. 101963, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101963.

M. Meyer et al., “Participatory Action Research: Tools for Disaster Resilience Education Michelle,” Physiol. Behav., vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 139–148, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2017-0015.Participatory.

L. S. Pettegrew and C. Day, “Smart Phones and Mediated Relationships: The Changing Face of Relational Communication,” Rev. Commun., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 122–139, 2015, doi: 10.1080/15358593.2015.1044018.

W. A. Cook, “Is mobile a reliable platform for survey taking?,” J. Advert. Res., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 141–148, 2014, doi: 10.2501/JAR-54-2-141-148.

J. K. Wachira and A. J. Sinclair, “Public participation in the emergency response phase of flooding: A case study of the red river basin,” Can. Water Resour. J., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 2005, doi: 10.4296/cwrj3002145.

W. H. Baker, H. Lon Addams, and B. Davis, “Critical factors for enhancing municipal public hearings,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 490–499, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00474.x.

S. Danielson, S. P. Tuler, S. L. Santos, T. Webler, and C. Chess, “Three tools for evaluating participation: Focus groups, Q method, and surveys,” Environ. Pract., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2012, doi: 10.1017/S1466046612000026.

J. M. Bryson, K. S. Quick, and B. C. Crosby, “Designing Public Participation Processes,” Public Adm. Rev., vol. 73, pp. 23–34, 2012, doi: 10.111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x.Designing.

A. Almoradie, V. J. Cortes, and A. Jonoski, “Web-based stakeholder collaboration in flood risk management,” J. Flood Risk Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–38, 2015, doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12076.

M. Evers, “Participation in Flood Risk Management An introduction and recommendations for implementation,” no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2012.

A. C. Tyagi, “Civil Society in the Water Sector,” Springer Water, pp. 303–311, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-2700-1_18.

M. D. Hendricks, M. A. Meyer, and S. M. Wilson, “Moving Up the Ladder in Rising Waters: Community Science in Infrastructure and Hazard Mitigation Planning as a Pathway to Community Control and Flood Disaster Resilience,” Citiz. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.5334/cstp.462.

B. De Marchi, “Learning from citizens: A Venetian experience,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 78, no. 1–3, pp. 247–259, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00225-9.

M. Buchecker, S. Menzel, and R. Home, “How much does participatory flood management contribute to stakeholders’ social capacity building? Empirical findings based on a triangulation of three evaluation approaches,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1427–1444, 2013, doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-1427-2013.

U. C. Nkwunonwo, “Flood Risk Analysis for Critical Infrastructure Protection: Issues and Opportunities in Less Developed Societies,” 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95364.

T. Laktić and Š. P. Malovrh, “Stakeholder participation in Natura 2000 management program: Case study of Slovenia,” Forests, vol. 9, no. 10, 2018, doi: 10.3390/f9100599.

J. Gaventa, “Finding the Space for Change: A Power Analysis,” IDS Bull., vol. 37, no. 6, 2006, doi: 10.1001/jama.1896.02430960015001d.

A. Dewulf and W. Elbers, “Power in and over cross-sector partnerships: Actor strategies for shaping collective decisions,” Adm. Sci., vol. 8, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.3390/admsci8030043.

V. C. Kapilima, “The Impact of Power and Power Relationships in the Public Policy Formulation Process: A Case Study of the Formulation Process of 2014 Tanzania’s Education and Training Policy,” Open Polit. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 220–230, 2020, doi: 10.1515/openps-2020-0020.

M. F. Nkemnyi, “An Analysis of Local Participation in Community Forestry: The Case of Tinto and Bimbia-Bonadikombo Community Forest, Cameroon,” Sustain. Environ., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 85, 2016, doi: 10.22158/se.v1n2p85.

S. A. Maskrey, S. Priest, and N. J. Mount, “Towards evaluation criteria in participatory flood risk management,” J. Flood Risk Manag., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12462.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj2716179X.v19i0.20828