Exploring Community Engagement: Neighbourhood Infrastructure Evolution in Sentani's Vernacular Settlements
Abstract
In the era of rapid development, enhancing vernacular settlements is crucial for sustainability, particularly in preserving cultural integrity. The Sentani Tribe exemplifies this challenge with its distinctive cultural heritage deeply rooted in the shores of Lake Sentani. Originally fishermen, the tribe has transitioned to farming, prompting shifts in their settlements and infrastructure. This study focuses on Kehiran villages, where such shifts have necessitated settlement improvements. It investigates opportunities for enhancing vernacular settlements through community engagement, considering cultural adaptations resulting from these infrastructure changes. Through empirical research and analysis, the study follows the identified seven key habitus changes impacting the Sentani Tribe's habitat, influencing infrastructure like worship spaces, schools, roads, and public areas. These findings underscore the potential for participatory improvements in vernacular settlements amidst evolving cultural landscape.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Dianingrum, M. Faqih, and D. Septanti, “Development of Kampung Improvement Program in Surabaya, Indonesia,” Int J Eng Sci (Ghaziabad), vol. 06, no. 07, pp. 41–47, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.9790/1813-0607014147.
D. T. Susilowati, Y. Rochwulaningsih, and H. Rinardi, “The Implementation of the Kampung Improvement Program in Semarang: Some Obstacles and Impacts,” Indonesian Historical Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 170–185, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.14710/ihis.v4i2.8951.
P. Oliver, Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture. Routledge, 2007. doi: 10.4324/9780080476308.
A. Mubita, M. Libati, and M. Mulonda, “The Importance and Limitations of Participation in Development Projects and Programmes,” European Scientific Journal, ESJ, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 238, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.19044/esj.2017.v13n5p238.
A. Adebayo, A. Iweka, B. Ogunbodede, and J. Igwe, “Architecture: The quest for cultural identity,” Facta universitatis - series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 169–177, 2013, doi: 10.2298/FUACE1302169A.
D. Widyastomo, “Perubahan Pola Permukiman Tradisional Suku Sentani di Pesisir Danau Sentani,” Jurnal Permukiman, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 67, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.31815/jp.2011.6.67-77.
D. Widyastomo, “Perubahan Permukiman Tradisional dari Habitus Nelayan Menjadi Petani pada Masyarakat Adat Sentani Papua,” Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya, 2020.
L. Octavia and J. Prijotomo, “Arsitektur Nusantara bukan Arsitektur Tradisional maupun Arsitektur Vernakular,” Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 167–171, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.32315/jlbi.7.4.249.
R. Brown and D. Maudlin, Concepts of Vernacular Architecture. London: Sage Publications Limited, 2011.
A. Rapoport, “Theory, Culture and Housing,” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 145–165, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1080/140360900300108573.
P. Tutuko and Z. Shen, “Vernacular Pattern of House Development for Home based Enterprises in Malang, Indonesia,” International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 63–77, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.14246/irspsd.2.3_63.
A. Asadpour, “DEFINING THE CONCEPTS & APPROACHES IN VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE STUDIES,” Nature: National Academic Journal of Architecture, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 241, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.24252/nature.v7i2a8.
P. Hardati, “Access to the Infrastructure of Settlement for Sustainable Development Goals in Rural District Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia,” 2017.
O. Soyinka and K. W. M. Siu, “Investigating Informal Settlement and Infrastructure Adequacy for Future Resilient Urban Center in Hong Kong, SAR,” Procedia Eng, vol. 198, pp. 84–98, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.075.
P. Parikh, H. Parikh, and A. Mcrobie, “The role of infrastructure in improving human settlements,” Proc Inst Civ Eng Urban Des Plan, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 101–118, 2013, doi: 10.1680/udap.10.00038.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Standar Nasional Indonesia Tata cara perencanaan lingkungan perumahan di perkotaan,” 2019.
A. Nur Ramadhani, M. Faqih, and A. Hayati, “INHABITANT’S SENSE OF PLACE IN THE CONTEXT OF TOURISM KAMPUNG,” Journal of architecture&ENVIRONMENT, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 151, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.12962/j2355262x.v17i2.a3894.
S. Funo, N. Yamamoto, and J. Silas, “Typology of Kampung Houses and Their Transformation Process-- A Study on Urban Tissues of an Indonesian City,” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 193–200, Nov. 2002, doi: 10.3130/jaabe.1.2_193.
R. Hastijanti, “KAMPUNG KOTA SEBAGAI ‘PERMUKIMAN BERPINTU GERBANG’ Dampak Globalisasi terhadap Permukiman Vernakular di Kota Surabaya,” NALARs, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 31–47, 2003.
A. Ramadhani, M. Faqih, and D. Septanti, “Development Concept Of Urban Housing Renewal Based On Sustainable Tourism A Case Study Of Kampung Tambak Bayan Surabaya,” International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, vol. 6, pp. 266–274, 2017.
R. Fathy, J. Lintang, and Y. Anuraga, “COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN (CAP) DAN KAMPUNG IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (KIP): STUDI KOMPARATIF KEBIJAKAN INKLUSIF TATA RUANG PERMUKIMAN DI SURABAYA DAN JAKARTA,” in Prosiding Konferensi Sosiologi Perkotaan UNS, 2018, pp. 13–22.
A. W. Purwantiasning, “Pola dan Strategi Perbaikan Permukiman Kumuh di Perkotaan,” NALARs, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 53–70, 2011, [Online]. Available: www.digilib.petra.ac.id,2009
M. Lauria and C. S. Slotterback, Learning from Arnstein’s Ladder. Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429290091.
L. N. Groat and D. Wang, “Architectural Research Method,” in Architectural research methods, 2013.
M. Calvo, “Strategies and tactics of participatory architecture,” Jun. 2022. doi: 10.21606/drs.2022.458.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j2716179X.v19i0.20954
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Based on a work at https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/jpr/index.