Hubungan Preferensi dan Kepuasan Penghuni Perumahan Informal di Kota Surabaya
Abstract
Seiring dengan pertumbuhan populasi perkotaan, kebutuhan akan hunian semakin meningkat, namun sering kali tidak diimbangi oleh penyediaan perumahan yang memadai. Hal ini menyebabkan munculnya permukiman informal, yang umumnya berkembang di luar regulasi formal dan memiliki kualitas infrastruktur dasar yang rendah. Kecamatan Gunung Anyar di Surabaya menjadi salah satu kawasan di mana permukiman informal berkembang pesat tanpa izin resmi, dengan kondisi infrastruktur dan lingkungan yang jauh dari ideal. Meskipun demikian, banyak penghuni yang memilih kawasan ini sebagai tempat tinggal karena faktor lokasi strategis dan aksesibilitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji hubungan antara preferensi penghuni terhadap hunian ideal dengan tingkat kepuasan mereka dalam kondisi permukiman informal di Kecamatan Gunung Anyar. Data diperoleh melalui survei terhadap 74 responden dengan skala Likert untuk menilai preferensi dan kepuasan, serta dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan regresi linier sederhana. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa preferensi penghuni terhadap kondisi ideal berhubungan positif dengan kepuasan, dengan koefisien determinasi sebesar 56,2%. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa 56,2% variasi kepuasan penghuni dipengaruhi oleh preferensi mereka terhadap hunian ideal. Meskipun preferensi penghuni terhadap kualitas hunian cukup tinggi, masih banyak aspek penting, seperti infrastruktur dasar, yang belum terpenuhi sehingga kepuasan yang dirasakan masih terbatas. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya perencanaan dan pengembangan perumahan informal yang lebih terarah untuk meningkatkan kualitas hidup penghuni.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
J. Jocom, A. K. T. Dundu, and B. F. Sompie, “ANALISIS KEPUASAN PENGHUNI PERUMAHAN GRIYA PANIKI INDAH MANADO,” Jurnal Ilmiah Media Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 305–314, 2015.
M. Nelza, M. Iqbal, I. Teknologi, and N. Malang, “Perbaikan Permukiman Informal di Indonesia: Refleksi Pendekatan Top-Down dan Bottom-Up.”
UN-Habitat, “THE CHALLENGE OF SLUMS,” 2003.
S. R. Foster, “Urban Informality as a Commons Dilemma, 40 U. Miami Inter-Am,” 2009. [Online]. Available: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialrAvailableat:http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol40/iss2/6
J. Joe and P. Z. Msimang, “A Study of the Negative Impacts of Informal Settlements on the Environment. A Case Study,” 2017.
E. I. Akkila, “Families Residing in Kallio-A Choice?,” 2012.
D. Rahmadaniyati, M. Faqih, and A. Hayati, “Housing Preference for Low-Income People in Indonesia.”
H. C. C. H. Coolen and S. J. T. Jansen, “Housing Preferences,” in International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 606–612. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00638-X.
S. J. T. Jansen, H. C. C. H. Coolen, and R. W. Goetgeluk, “The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice,” in The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice, Springer Netherlands, 2011, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8894-9_1.
b,* , L. H. c , C. M. c Veronique Van Acker a, “‘Home sweet home’. How staying more at home impacted residential satisfaction and residential attachment during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sydney, Australia,” Travel Behav Soc, pp. 1–12, 2023, Accessed: Oct. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100671
A. G. Salleh, “Neighbourhood factors in private low-cost housing in Malaysia,” Habitat Int, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 485–493, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.002.
N. Made Sukartini, “HOUSING SATISFACTION INDICATORS IN INDONESIA, ANALYSIS OF SPTK 2017 Fahrizal,” vol. 9, pp. 41–48, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/planomadani
M. Amerigo and J. I. Aragones, “A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction,” J Environ Psychol, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 1997, doi: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0038.
S. J. T. Jansen, “Why is Housing Always Satisfactory? A Study into the Impact of Preference and Experience on Housing Appreciation,” Soc Indic Res, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 785–805, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0114-9.
Galster, “Evaluating Indicators For Housing Policy Residential Satisfaction VS Marginal Improvement Priorities,” Social Indicators Research 16 (1985) 415-448, 1985.
M. Lu, “Determinants of Residential Satisfaction: Ordered Logit vs. Regression Models,” 1999.
I. Fauzi Syamsu et al., “Study of Land Cover Change in the Mangrove Ecosystem of the East Coast of Surabaya,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
L. D. T. Siagian, P. K. Stefanugroho, Z. Nisa, I. D. M. F. Septanaya, and P. G. Ariastita, “Assessment of liveability on settlements developed by informal land subdividers in Gunung Anyar and Rungkut Districts, Surabaya,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, May 2022. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1015/1/012015.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya, “GUNUNG ANYAR DALAM ANGKA,” 2021.
M. Ichwan and H. Wresniwira, “Rezim Pertumbuhan Kota: Studi Pembangunan di Kecamatan Gununganyar,” 2017.
A. S. Nugroho and W. Harianto, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatid dengan Pendekatan Statistika (Teori, Implementasi, & Praktik dengan SPSS). Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2022.
B. Hjørland, “Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science,” 2005. doi: 10.1108/00220410510578050.
M. A. Farraz and L. S. Barus, “Housing Preferences and Choice Young Families Commuters in Depok City, Indonesia,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics Publishing, Apr. 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/264/1/012010.
Y. Mulyano, R. A. Rahadi, and U. Amaliah, “Millennials Housing Preferences Model in Jakarta,” European Journal of Business and Management Research, vol. 5, no. 1, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.1.240.
N. Killemsetty, M. Johnson, and A. Patel, “Understanding housing preferences of slum dwellers in India: A community-based operations research approach,” Eur J Oper Res, vol. 298, no. 2, pp. 699–713, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.055.
M. A. Mohit and A. M. M. A. K. Raja, “Residential satisfaction-Concept, theories and empirical studies,” Planning Malaysia, vol. 12, pp. 47–66, 2014, doi: 10.21837/pmjournal.v12.i3.131.
N. Z. Abidin, M. I. Abdullah, N. Basrah, and M. N. Alias, “Residential Satisfaction: Literature Review and A Conceptual Framework,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics Publishing, Nov. 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012040.
M. A. Mohit, M. Ibrahim, and Y. R. Rashid, “Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,” Habitat Int, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.04.002.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Alfabeta, 2017.
A. Jazuli, Statistika Penelitian dilengkapi dengan SPSS, vol. ISBN: 9786026697691. UMP Press, 2023.
B. Sakina and D. Setiawan, “Housing Satisfaction and Preferences Towards Indoor Quality Related to the Environmental Factors in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2023. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1169/1/012076.
R. H. Moh. S. Muhammad Alfarisy Amrul, “Perencanaan Jaringan Distribusi Air Bersih di Perumahan Grand Arfa Wulandira Kabupaten Serang dengan Aplikasi WaterCAD CONNECT Edition,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Rekayasa Sumber Daya Air , vol. Vol. 2 No. 1, 2022.
X. Cao and D. Wang, “Environmental correlates of residential satisfaction: An exploration of mismatched neighborhood characteristics in the Twin Cities,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 150, pp. 26–35, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.007.
S. Sadeghlou and A. Emami, “Residential preferences and satisfaction: a qualitative study using means-end chain theory,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1711–1734, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10901-023-10017-1.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j2716179X.v19i2.21468
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Based on a work at https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/jpr/index.