Transport Demand and Traffic Engineering Scheme in The Street Space Reallocation Plan For The Future Tram Track

Wahju Herijanto, Hera Widyastuti, Anak Agung Gde Kartika, Budi Rahardjo, Catur Arif Prastyanto, Istiar Istiar

Abstract


Surabaya has the plan to reactivate tram in several arterial streets which will cause car lane reduction. This research aims to enhance the traffic performance of several arterial streets in Surabaya after the reduction of street width due to street space reallocation for the future tram track. The modal split analysis in a natural car and train or pulled scheme is compared to several vehicle restriction methods or push scheme which using data from car and motorcycle rider. From comprehensive computation, it is concluded that the insertion of tram track in the road space directly without any transport demand management will impact street performance to a more severe condition of traffic jam intersection. Therefore this research advising city government to apply restriction scheme to car and motorcycle by using high occupancy vehicle only scheme or prepaid area licensing scheme.


Keywords


vehicle restriction; tram; Surabaya; traffic engineering

Full Text:

PDF

References


Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga, “Indonesian Highway Capacity Manual”, 1996.

Naweed, A. and Rose, J. “It’s a frightful scenario”: A study of tram collisions on a mixed-traffic environment in an Australian metropolitan setting”. Procedia Manufacturing, Volume 3, Pages 2706-2713, 2015.

Naznin, F., Currie, G., Logan, D., and Sarvi, M. “Safety impacts of platform tram stops on pedestrians in mixed traffic operation: A comparison group before-after crash study”. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 86, Pages 1-8, January 2016.

Litman, T., “London Congestion Pricing Implication for Other Cities”. Victoria Transport Policy Institut, 2006.

T&E, “Congestion Pricing in London, A European Perspective”, European Federation for Transport and Environment, 2003.

Kilani, M., Proost, S., and van der Loo, S., “Road pricing and public transport pricing reform in Paris: Complements or substitutes”. Economics of Transportation, Volume 3, issue 2, Pages 175-187, June 2014.

Pronello, C. and Rappazzo, V., “Road pricing: How people perceive a hypothetical introduction”. The case of Lyon. Transport Policy, Volume 36, Pages 192-205, November 2014.

Dieplinger, M. and Furst, E., “The acceptability of road pricing: Evidence from two studies in Vienna and four other European cities”. Transport Policy, Volume 36, Pages 10-18, November 2014

Di Ciommo, F. and Lucas, K., “Evaluating the equity effects of road-pricing in the European urban context – The Madrid Metropolitan Area”. Applied Geography, Volume 54, Pages 74-82, October 2014.

Seik, F.T., “An effective demand management instrument in urban transport: the Area Licencing Scheme in Singapore”. Cities, Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 155-164, June 1997.

Hensher, D.A. and Bliemer, M.C.J., “What type of road pricing scheme might appeal to politicians? Viewpoints on the challenge in gaining the citizen and public servant vote by staging reform”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 61, Pages 227-237, March 2014.

De Luca, S. and Di Pace, R., “Modelling users behavior in an inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 71, Pages 59-76, January 2015.

Sateennam, T., Jaensirisak, S., Satiennam, W., Detdamrong, S., “Potential for a modal shift by passenger car and motorcycle users toward Bus Rapid transit (BRT) in an Asian developing city”. IATSS Research, In Press, Corrected Proof, April 2015




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j26226847.v1i1.3789

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats