A Review of Structural Relationships in Closed-Loop Supply Chain Model

E Yuliawati, Pratikto Pratikto, Sugiono Sugiono, O Novareza


The acquisition strategy of returned products has become essential in the study of reverse supply chain.  There are three primary activities included in the process of a the reverse supply chain, the acquisition of returned products, the remanufacturing process, and redistribution. This literature review intends to study the existing relationship amongst supply chain players in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) model. In the remanufacturing process performed by the company, returned products must be collected from consumers. Therefore, remanufacturing companies rely upon consumers as cores suppliers. This makes the good relationship between the two become  crucial in company operational sustainability successfully.  In this study, the identified journal articles were categorized into types of structural relationships between supply chain players and network structures of a reverse supply chain. Types of structural relationships are ownership-based, service-contract, direct-order, deposit-based, credit-based, buy-back, and voluntary–based. There are four types of returned product collector and remanufacturer: Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), a third party (3PL), retailer, and remanufacturer. Discussion of the journal articles was presented in each category. After that, the structural relationship was explored to find its advantage and disadvantage, so that CLSC can be managed effectively and efficiently. As a summary, suggestions for future research were described as the result of the literature review conducted.

Full Text:



K. Nakashima and A. P. S. Loomba, “Parts quality‐based priority policy in remanufacturing environments,” J. Adv. Manag. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 162–175, 2013.

J. Östlin, E. Sundin, and M. Björkman, “Importance of closed-loop supply chain relationships for product remanufacturing,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 336–348, 2008.

E. Sundin and O. Dunbäck, “Reverse logistics challenges in remanufacturing of automotive mechatronic devices,” J. Remanufacturing, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2, 2013.

M. Ferguson and L. Toktay, “The effect of competition on recovery strategies,” Prod. Oper. Manag., vol. 15, 2006.

K. Govindan, H. Soleimani, and D. Kannan, “Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain : A comprehensive review to explore the future,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 240, no. 3, pp. 603–626, 2015.

S. Guo, B. Shen, T. Choi, and S. Jung, “A review on supply chain contracts in reverse logistics : Supply chain structures and channel leaderships *,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 144, pp. 387–402, 2017.

G. Qiaolun, J. Jianhua, and G. Tiegang, “Pricing decisions for reverse supply chains,” Kybernetes, vol. 40, no. 5/6, pp. 831–841, 2011.

T. Maiti and B. C. Giri, “A closed loop supply chain under retail price and product quality dependent demand,” J. Manuf. Syst.

B. C. Giri and S. Sharma, “Optimizing a closed-loop supply chain with manufacturing defects and quality dependent return rate,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 35, pp. 92–111, 2015.

J. Gönsch, “Buying used products for remanufacturing: negotiating or posted pricing,” J. Bus. Econ., vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 715–747, 2014.

S. Hahler and M. Fleischmann, “The Value of Acquisition Price Differentiation in Reverse Logistics,” J. Bus. Econ., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2013.

N. Aras, R. Güllü, and S. Yürülmez, “Optimal inventory and pricing policies for remanufacturable leased products,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 262–271, 2011.

R. Kleber, S. Zanoni, and L. Zavanella, “Int . J . Production Economics On how buyback and remanufacturing strategies affect the profitability of spare parts supply chains,” Intern. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 135–142, 2011.

C.-H. Wu, “Price and service competition between new and remanufactured products in a two-echelon supply chain,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 496–507, Nov. 2012.

C. Chuang, C. X. Wang, and Y. Zhao, “Int . J . Production Economics Closed-loop supply chain models for a high-tech product under alternative reverse channel and collection cost structures,” Intern. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 156, pp. 108–123, 2014.

Y. Xiong, G. Li, Y. Zhou, K. Fernandes, R. Harrison, and Z. Xiong, “Dynamic pricing models for used products in remanufacturing with lost-sales and uncertain quality,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 147, Part , pp. 678–688, Jan. 2014.

S. Wei, O. Tang, and W. Liu, “Refund policies for coress with quality variation in OEM remanufacturing,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 170, pp. 629–640, 2015.

I. S. Bakal and E. Akcali, “Effects of Random Yield in Remanufacturing with Price-Sensitive Supply and Demand,” Prod. Oper. Manag., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 407–420, 2009.

M. R. Galbreth and J. D. Blackburn, “Optimal acquisition quantities in remanufacturing with condition uncertainty,” Prod. Oper. Manag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 2010.

M. Ferguson, V. D. R. Guide, K. Eylem, and G. C. Souza, “The Value of Quality Grading in Remanufacturing,” 2009.

L. Feng, K. Govindan, and C. Li, “Strategic planning : Design and coordination for dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain considering consumer behavior,” Eur J Oper.Res., vol.260, no. 2, pp. 601–612, 2017.

R. H. Teunter, S. Douwe, and P. Flapper, “Optimal cores acquisition and remanufacturing policies under uncertain cores quality fractions,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 241–248, 2011.

X. Cai, M. Lai, X. Li, Y. Li, and X. Wu, “Optimal acquisition and production policy in a hybrid manufacturing / remanufacturing system with cores acquisition at different quality levels,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 374–382, 2014.

J. Xu and N. Liu, “Research on closed loop supply chain with reference price effect,” J. Intell. Manuf., no. August, 2014.

Z. Huang, G. Zhang, and L. Meng, “Research on coordination strategy of remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain based on quantity discount,” Adv. Intell. Soft Comput., vol. 137 AISC, no. 2008, pp. 639–649, 2012.

P. Yi, M. Huang, L. Guo, and T. Shi, “A retailer oriented closed-loop supply chain network design for end of life construction machinery remanufacturing,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 137, pp. 1393–1405, 2016.

N. Mohan, N. Modak, S. Panda, and S. Sankar, “Analyzing structure of two-echelon closed-loop supply chain for pricing , quality and recycling management,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 171, pp. 512–528, 2018.

M. Kwak and H. Kim, “Market Positioning of Remanufactured Products With Optimal Planning for Part Upgrades,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 135, no. 1, p. 011007, 2013.

A. Yamzon, V. Ventura, P. Guico, and C. Sy, “Optimal planning of incentive-based quality in closed-loop supply chains,” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, no. Oecd 2011, 2016.

Z. Miao, K. Fu, Z. Xia, and Y. Wang, “Models for closed-loop supply chain with trade-ins,” vol. 66, pp. 308–326, 2017.

J. Li, Z. Wang, B. Jiang, and T. Kim, “Coordination strategies in a three-echelon reverse supply chain for economic and social benefit R,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 49, no. 71471105, pp. 599–611, 2017.

L. J. Zeballos, M. I. Gomes, A. P. Barbosa-Povoa, and A. Q. Novais, “Addressing the uncertain quality and quantity of returns in closed-loop supply chains,” Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 47, pp. 237–247, Dec. 2012.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2018i6.4626


  • There are currently no refbacks.

View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.