Analysis Suppliers Selection of the Construction Raw Material in PT. Y Using VIKOR Method

Octavia Olga Citra Dewi, Erma Suryani

Abstract


Improving supply chain management is one way to excel in competition. The selection of suppliers is an important part because the lack of proper supplier selection can lead to losses for the company. In its practice, the supplier selection process is more frequently based on a supplier that can provide the lowest price. This happens because the supplier selection process is considered to be at the operational level and not at the strategic level. The number of raw material suppliers on the construction project makes the developers be careful in choosing the material that is according to the developers’ plans. All this time, the selection of suppliers involves many factors, sometimes a supplier has a good performance in terms of the delivery process, yet lacks in terms of quality compared to other suppliers and vice versa. Therefore, research must be done with a method that can take the factors, both the qualitative and quantitative, into consideration. This study is conducted to identify the factors of the selection of construction raw material suppliers and the support of alternative decision support in the selection of construction raw material suppliers. The purpose of this research is to identify the factors of the selection of raw material suppliers and the support of alternative decision in the selection of construction raw material suppliers. This research is expected to help the construction industry, especially in the city of Jember regarding the importance of knowing the factors of the selection of construction raw material suppliers and the decision of the selection of construction raw material suppliers especially if the selection of the construction raw material is in the power of the developer. The method used is the integration of AHP and Vikor using rough number. This research is expected to facilitate the process of selecting raw material suppliers and the selection of its alternatives.The results of this study gain the order of priority of 9 criteria and 23 sub-criteria. The recommended selection of suppliers based on its ranking on the sand suppliers is sand supplier P3, sand supplier P2, and sand supplier P1. Meanwhile, the ranking for the coral suppliers is coral supplier K3, then coral supplier K2, and lastly coral supplier K1

Keywords


AHP; rough number; supplier selection; VIKOR

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Amid, S. H. Ghodsypour, and C. O’Brien, “A weighted max-min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 139–145, 2011.

C. Gencer and D. Gürpinar, “Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2475–2486, 2007.

K. Shahroudi and S. M. S. Tonekaboni, “Application of TOPSIS method to supplier selection in Iran auto supply chain,” J. Glob. Strateg. Manag., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 123–131, 2012.

B. Chang, C. W. Chang, and C. H. Wu, “Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1850–1858, Mar. 2011.

J. D. Huang and M. H. Hu, “Two-stage solution approach for supplier selection: A case study in a Taiwan automotive industry,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 237–251, 2013.

BPMIGAS, Pedoman Tata Kerja Pengelolaan Rantai Pasok Pengembangan Perumahan. BPMIGAS, 2011.

E. Juarti, Kajian Pola Rantai Pasok Pembangunan Perumahan. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2008.

L. Y. Zhai, L. P. Khoo, and Z. W. Zhong, “A rough set based QFD approach to the management of imprecise design information in product development,” Adv. Eng. Informatics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 222–228, Apr. 2009.

L. Y. Zhai, L. P. Khoo, and Z. W. Zhong, “A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 37, no. 5–6, pp. 613–624, May 2008.

R. V. Rao, “Multiple Attribute Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment,” in Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, London, UK: Springer-Verlag London, 2013, pp. 1–5.

S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, Jul. 2004.

A. Sanayei, S. Farid Mousavi, and A. Yazdankhah, “Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 24–30, Jan. 2010.

S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 514–529, Apr. 2007.

A. Jahan, F. Mustapha, M. Y. Ismail, S. M. Sapuan, and M. Bahraminasab, “A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection,” Mater. Des., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1215–1221, Mar. 2011.

K. Devi, “Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 14163–14168, 2011.

G. W. Dickson, “An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions,” J. Purch., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 1966.

I. K. Wardhani, “Seleksi Supplier Bahan Baku Dengan Metode TOPSIS Fuzzy MADM (Studi Kasus : PT. Giri Sekar Kedaton Gresik ),” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2012.

B. Muslim and Y. Iriani, “Pemilihan supplier bahan baku tinta menggunakan metode Analytical Hyrarchy Process (AHP) (Studi kasus di PT. INFIGO),” in Seminar Nasional Design and Application of Technology, 2010, pp. 19–26.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6334

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.