Productivity Analysis Using the Critical Chain Project Method Management (CCPM) on Repair Projects Geomarin-III ship 649 DWT.

Ari Wibawa Budi Santosa, Ocid Mursid, M. Angger Kalingga, Syaiful Tambah Putra Ahmad, Andi Trimulyono

Abstract


Ship repair project planning still often encountered problems that delay ship repair projects to achieve complete ship repair projects. Delays are due to frequent mismatches between ship repair scheduling and conditions that occur at the shipyard. The most commonly used method is the Critical Path Method (CPM). But in reality, the CPM method is considered less effective because there is still safety time for each job. Technological developments found the latest method, namely Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM). This method removes the safety time contained in the CPM method and replaces it with buffer time which is placed at the end of work activities. This study aims to analyze the duration of the critical path, determine labor costs, and the amount of buffer duration on the repair of the Geomarin-III 649 DWT ship. Based on the calculation results obtained on the repair of the Geomarin-III 649 DWT ship with the Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM) method is 10 days, 10 days faster than the normal duration. The labor cost obtained using the CCPM method is IDR. 54,017,500, saving 35% of the normal cost is IDR. 82,680,000, but if the buffer time is used thoroughly, the total estimated labor cost for the CCPM method will increase due to the addition of labor and the duration of the buffer time obtained by the CCPM method as a substitute for safety time, which is 9 days project buffer and 3 days feeding buffers. Based on this research, it was found that the CCPM method is considered effective and can accelerate the duration of the project and minimize labor costs.

Keywords


Buffer Time; Cost; CCPM; CPM; Project Schedule

Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Ahola, & A. Davies, “Insights for the governance of large projects : Analysis of Organization Theory and Project Management”: Administering Uncertainty in Norwegian Offshore Oil by Stinchcombe and Heimer. Int J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 5(8), 661-679. 2012.

J. R. Sitorus, Syaifuddin, & R. M. Hutauruk, “Produktivitas Pada Aktivitas Reparasi Di Galangan Kapal Pelabuhan Perikanan Nusantara Pelabuhan Ratu Provinsi Jawa Barat”. J. Univ. Riau, 14(17), 4240-4248. 2018. (in Bahasa)

Y. Triaditya,. “Kajian Percepatan Penjadwalan Overhaul Kapal Selam (KRI CAKRA – 401) dengan Metode CPM (Critical Path Method) dan PERT (Program Evaluation Review and Technique”. 2015. (in Bahasa)

L.P Leach,. “Critical Chain Management”. Boston,Artech House. 2000

M. Shurrab,. “Traditional Critical Path Method versus Critical Chain Project Management: A Comparative View”. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Sci, 4(9), 4-9. 2015.

M. Taghipour, F. Seraj, M. Amin, & M. Changiz Delivand, “Evaluating CCPM Method Versus CPM in Multiple Petrochemical Projects”. Management, 3(3), 1-20. 2020.

A, Suharsimi, “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik”. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2019.

S, Silaen, “Metode Penilitian Sosial untuk Penilisan Skripsi dan Tesis”. Bogor: Penerbit In Media, 2018.

A, Rianto, “Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Hukum”, Jakarta: Granit, 2010.

S, Subroto,”Manajemen Pendidikan Sekolah”, Jakarta: PN Rineka Cipta, 2003.

Hasan, M. Iqbal, “Pokok-Pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian dan Aplikasinya”. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002.

S., Wiji Utomo,. “ Analisa Produktivitas Dengan Metode Critical Chain Project Management Pada Proyek Reparasi TB Tanjung Buyut I 2x600 HP”. J Teknik Perkapalan., 9(3). 2021.(in Bahasa)

C. I. G. Nangka, M. Sibi, & J. B. Mangare,. “ Tenaga Kerja Pada Proyek Bangunan Dengan Menggunakan Microsoft Project (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Terminal Akap)"., J.Sipil Statik, 6(11), 867-874. 2018. (in Bahasa)

H.T Handoko,. ”Dasar - dasar Manajemen Produksi dan Operasis”. Yogyakarta. BPFE-UGM. 2016. (in Bahasa)

A. Izmailov, D. Korneva, & A. Kozhemiakin,. “Effective Project Management with Theory of Constraints”. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 229(9), 96-103. 2022.

Project Management Institute, “A Guide to the Management Body of Knowledge 5th Edition”. Pennsylvania:Project Management Institute Inc, 2013.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v8i1.15169

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracted / Indexed by:
      
  

 

 

 

 

 

P-ISSN: 2541-5972   

E-ISSN: 2548-1479

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

IJMEIR journal published by  Department of Marine Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia under licenced Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence. Based on https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/ijmeir/