Analysis of Human Error Probability at Shipyard Using Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART)
Abstract
In shipyards, human error is a serious problem that can compromise operational effectiveness, productivity, and safety. The effectiveness of shipyard operations still largely depends on human participation, despite the quick advances in automation and technology. In shipyards, human error can result in mishaps, monetary losses, and reputational harm. Finding workable solutions is therefore essential to lowering the possibility of human error. The possibility of human error in shipyards is investigated in this article by first determining the variables that may lead to errors and then estimating the likelihood that they will occur. The Human Error Assessment and Reduction Technique (HEART) is the methodology employed. A technique called HEART is used to assess the degree of human error in a system, which helps to analyze how human errors affect a system's performance. The analysis's findings show that bending and pressing plates are two fieldwork tasks that have a high risk of human error. This study also makes it clear that management’s engagement in resolving human error issues must be proactive. Hands-on training, ongoing safety policy formulation, and encouragement of a happy workplace are just a few ways that management can help lower the possibility of human error.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Reason, J. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139062367
Norman, D. A. 1983b. Design principles for human-computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’83) (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/800045.801571
Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, Rules, and Knowledge; Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13(3), 257-266.
Mohammad Danil Arifin, Fanny Octaviani (2022). Occupational Health and Safety Analysis Using HIRA and AS/NZS 4360:2004 Standard at XYZ Shipyard. International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research, Vol. 7. No. 3. Pp. 145-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v7i3.14151
Celebi U.B., Ekinci S., Alarcin F., Unsalan D. 2010. The risk of occupational safety and health in shipbuilding industry in Turkey; Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Maritime and Naval Science and Engineering; Constantza, Romania. 3–5
Krstev S., Stewart P., Rusiecki J., Blair A. 2006. Mortality among shipyard coast guard workers: A retrospective cohort study. Occup. Environ. Med. 64:651–658. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.029652
Seker S., Recal F., Basligil H. 2017. A combined DEMATEL and grey system theory approach for analyzing occupational risks: A case study in Turkish shipbuilding industry. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2017; 23:1340–1372. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2017.1308815.
Barlas B., Izci B.F. 2018. Individual and workplace factors related to fatal occupational accidents among shipyard workers in Turkey. Saf. Sci. 101:173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.012
Efe B. 2019. Analysis of operational safety risks in shipbuilding using failure mode and effect analysis approach. Ocean Eng. 187:106214. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106214.
Abramowicz-Gerigk T., Hejmlich A. 2015. Human factor modelling in the risk assessment of port manoeuvers. TransNav-Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 9:427–433. doi: 10.12716/1001.09.03.16.
Yilmaz A.I., Yilmaz F., Celebi U. 2015. Analysis of shipyard accidents in Turkey. Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 5:472–481. doi: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14126.
Crispim J., Fernandes J., Rego N. 2020. Customized risk assessment in military shipbuilding. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 197:106809. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106809.
Qiao W., Liu Y., Ma X., Liu Y. 2020. Human factors analysis for maritime accidents based on a dynamic fuzzy Bayesian network. Risk Anal. 1:13444. doi: 10.1111/risa.13444.
Shappell S.A., Wiegmann D.A. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS. 2000. [(accessed on 12 December 2020)]. Available online: https://commons.erau.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1777&context=publication
Aps R., Fetissov M., Goerlandt F., Kujala P., Piel A. 2006. Systems-theoretic process analysis of maritime traffic safety management in the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea); Proceedings of the 4th European Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) Workshop; Zurich, Switzerland. 13–15
Akyuz E., Celik M., Cebi S. 2006. A phase of comprehensive research to determine marine-specific EPC values in human error assessment and reduction technique. Saf. Sci. 87:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.013.
He Y., Kuai N., Deng L., He X. 2021. A method for assessing Human Error Probability through physiological and psychological factors tests based on CREAM and its applications. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 215:107884. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107884.
Ceylan B.O., Akyuz E., Arslan O. 2021. Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) approach to analyse socio-technical systems of ship allision in narrow waters. Ocean Eng. 239:107544. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109804.
Kirwan, B. (1992). Human error identification in human reliability assessment: II. Detailed comparison of techniques. Applied Ergonomics, 23(6), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(92)90368-6
Bell, Julie & Justin Holroyd. 2009.” Review of human reliability assessment methods”, Health and Safety Laboratory. Available on http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr679.pdf.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v9i1.20169
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
| |||
|
|
|
|
P-ISSN: 2541-5972
E-ISSN: 2548-1479
IJMEIR journal published by Department of Marine Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia under licenced Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence. Based on https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/ijmeir/