Configuration Selection Based On Lifecycle Cost Of Subsea Production System: Case Of Indonesia Deepwater Field

Christoffel. F.B Sa'u, Daniel M Rosyid

Abstract


Subsea tie back systems are important parts of oil and gas production project. The decision to select a subsea tie-back configuration with the objective goal of lowest lifecycle cost can be configured in multiple ways based on the field specifications and operator’s approach to operation. This paper presents an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine economical levels of subsea tie-back wells configuration, based on lifecycle cost of subsea deepwater production systems with respect to wells number alternative. Field reservoir located in deepwater of eastern Indonesian with the depth of 1400 meters and field life 40 years is studied. From this study, it is identified that the most economical configuration in subsea production systems: satellite tie-back configuration to develop small field with 6 numbers of wells; for 12 numbers of wells, template subsea tie-back configuration is the best.

Keywords


Lifecycle Cost; Subsea Production System; Deepwater Field; Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Full Text:

PDF

References


O. R. Mata, "Model for economical analysis of oil and gas deepwater production concepts/Comparisons of Life Cycle Cost of Subsea Production Systems vs. Floating Structures with dry wellheads", Thesis Master in Offshore Technology/Subsea Technology, Norway.: University of Stavanger., 2010, pp. 34-39.

R. Goldsmith, R. Eriksen, M. Childs, B. Saucier and F. J. Deegen, "Lifetime Cost of Subsea Production Systems, Prepared for subsea joint industry project, system description & FMEA,.," Project Report Prepared for the Minerals Management Service MMS Project Number 331, Rev. 2.,Goldsmith Engineering, Inc; Det Norske Varitas,, Norway, 2000.

API, "General overview of subsea production systems, Technical Report 17 TR13, First Edition," American Petroleum Institute., 2015.

C. Mudrak, Subsea production systems-A review of components, maintenance and reliability., Norway: Thesis Master Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology-Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, 2016, pp. 12-15.

A. Suyanto, Teknologi dan Instalasi Subsea, Buku Pintar Migas Indonesia Edisi I., 2008, pp. 12-14.

Y. Bai and Q. Bai, Subsea Structural Engineering Handbook, ,United Kingdom.: Elsevier Inc., Oxford, OX5 1GB,, 2010, pp. 52-55.

L. Liana, "Using Analytical Hierarchy Process to Determine Appropriate Minimum Attractive Rate of Return for Oil and Gas Project in Indonesia," PM world journal, vol. III, no. 2, pp. 4-5, 2014.

T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

N. Bhushan and K. Rai, Strategic Decision Making Applying The Analytical Hierarchy Process, ISBN 978-1-85233-756-8, IX 11-21, Springer., 2004, pp. 11-20.

T. L. Saaty, "Decision Making With The Analytical Hierarchy Process," Int. J. Services Sciences, vol. I, no. 1, pp. 85-87, 2008.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v2i2.3648

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Abstracted / Indexed by:
      
  

 

 

 

 

 

P-ISSN: 2541-5972   

E-ISSN: 2548-1479

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

IJMEIR journal published by  Department of Marine Engineering, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia under licenced Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence. Based on https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/ijmeir/