HAZOP Study and SIL Verification of Fuel Gas System in ORF Using IEC 61511 Standard and FTA Method

Nurhadi Siswantoro; Dwi Priyanta; Afanda Dwi Ragil Risnavian; M. Badrus Zaman; Trika Pitana; Hari Prastowo; Semin Semin

doi:10.12962/j25481479.v7i1.7609

HAZOP Study and SIL Verification of Fuel Gas System in ORF Using IEC 61511 Standard and FTA Method

Nurhadi Siswantoro, Dwi Priyanta, Afanda Dwi Ragil Risnavian, M. Badrus Zaman, Trika Pitana, Hari Prastowo, Semin Semin

Abstract

Safety is an important aspect of the industrial process. Failure of system and mechanism endanger both human and environmental safety. Safety is obligated to be implemented precisely and thoroughly to prevent failure consequences. One of the preventive implementations is to map out safety devices in the form of SIS (Safety Instrumented System) and other layers of protection. However, to acknowledge this safety device performance used SIL (Safety Integrity Level). This final research is intended to analyze Fuel Gas systems on Onshore Receiving Facilities (ORF). HAZOP (Hazard Operability Study) as process hazard analysis with deviation during the operation so that the risk level is known. SIL verification towards SIL target is SIL-2 refer to IEC 61511 standards by FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) method. From the HAZOP study can be concluded that over-pressure becomes a top hazard to all nodes due to the most severe consequences, the highest likelihood (medium risk). The calculation result of PFDavg is Node 1 (Fuel Gas Scrubber V-6060) is 6,22E-03, Node 2 (Fuel Gas Filter Separator S-6060A) is 1,24E-03, Node 3 (Fuel Gas Filter Separator S-6060B) is 1,24E-03, Node 4 (Fuel Gas Superheater E-6060) is 1,21E-03, and Node 5 (Instrument Gas Receiver V-6070) is 2,23E-03. The conclusion of this research shows that five components of the Fuel Gas System fulfill the SIL-2 target, therefore, doing a re-design to add a safety device is unnecessary

Keywords

failure rate; node; over-pressure; probability of failure on demand; process hazard analysis; safety device

Full Text:

PDF

References

R. Yuliani, “Pentingnya Keselamatan Proses Produksi dalam Industri”, ITS News, Surabaya, Oct. 10, 2018.

UK HMSO, “The Flixborough Disaster: Report of the Court of Inquiry”, UK Health and Safety Executive, UK, 1975.

P. A. Risanto, “Introduction to Offshore Oil and Gas Surface Facilities”, Nov. 17, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.slide

share.net/PuputAryanto/introduction-to-offshore-oil-and-gas-surface-facilities [Accessed on Jan. 2020]

IEC 61511 Functional Safety - Safety Instrumented systems for the process industry process, British Standard, 2003

D. Warsiah, “Metode Penulisan Karya Ilmiah”, Laboratorium Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan UPI, Bandung, 2009.

W. Gulo, “Metode Penelitian”, PT. Grasindo, Jakarta, 2002.

T. Sutabri, “Sistem Informasi Manajemen”, CV Andi Offset, Yogyakarta, 2005.

M. Fahim, T. Al-Shahaf, and A. Elkiani, “Fundamental of Petroleum Refining”, 14.7.3 HAZOP Case Study, Elsevier Science, Kuwait, 2009.

Primetech, “Technical Materials – The Hazard and Operability (HAZOP)”, 2020, [Online]. Available:http://www.primetech.com

/technical/hazop [Accessed on Jan. 2020]

N. Hyatt, “Guideline for Process Hazards Analysis, Hazard Identification & Risk Analysis”, Dyadem Press, CRC Press, Kanada, 2004.

ISO 31000: 2009, “Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines”, International Standard for Organization, 2009.

ISA-TR84.00.02 Part 1, “SIF-SIL Evaluation Techniques Part 1: Introduction, ISA, North Carolina, 2002.

ISA-TR84.00.02 Part 3, “SIF-SIL Evaluation Techniques Part 3: Determining the SIL of a SIF via Fault Tree Analysis”, ISA, North Carolina, 2002.

W. Irfansyah, “Verifikasi Safety Integrity Level Menggunakan Metode Semi-Kuantitatif IEC 61511 Studi Kasus: Tangki Timbun – Filling Shed Terminal LPG”, POMITS Journal, Digital Library ITS, Surabaya, 2013.

D. J. Smith, “Reliability, Maintainability, and Risk (Eighth Edition)”, Elsevier Ltd., ISBN 978-0-08-096902-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-66333-4, 2011.

IEC 61882 Hazard and Operability (HAZOP Studies) – Application Guide, British Standard, 2001.

A. E. Summers, “Viewpoint on ISA TR84.0.02 – Simplified Methods and Fault Tree Analysis”, ISA Transaction, 2000.

Det Norske Veritas (DNV), “OREDA Offshore Reliability Data Handbook 4”, OREDA Participants, Norway, 2002.

W. Denson et al., “Nonelectronics Parts Reliability Data (NPRD)”, Reliability Analysis Center, Rome, 1991.

T. F. Barry, “Risk-informed, performance-based industrial fire protection: An alternative to prescriptive codes”, 1st edition Tennessee Valley Pub, 2002.

L. Dai et al., “Analysis and Comparison of Long-Distance Pipeline Failures”, Journal of Petroleum Engineering, Volume 2017, Article ID 3174636, Feb. 2017.

D. Priyanta, N. Siswantoro and A. Megawan, "Risk based inspection of gas-cooling heat exchanger", International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 317-329, 2017. Available: 10.12962/j25481479.v1i4.2650

N. Siswantoro, D. Priyanta, M. B. Zaman, P. S. Andaka, and W. Busse., "Risk analysis of scrubber vessel using risk-based inspection method in geothermal power plant", In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 649, no. 1, p. 012016. IOP Publishing, 2021.

N. Cahyono, M. B. Zaman, N. Siswantoro, D. Priyanta & T. Pitana, “Risk Analysis Using the Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) Method for a Pressure Vessel at Offshore Platform”, In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1052, No. 1, p. 012051). IOP Publishing, 2021.

N. Siswantoro, D. Priyanta, J. Ramadhan, & M. B. Zaman, “Implementation of Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) in Condensate Separator and Storage Vessel: A Case Study”, International Journal of Marine Engineering Innovation and Research, 6(1), 2021.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v7i1.7609