Comparative Seismic Performance Analysis of a 30-Story Building Structure with CFST Columns Using Concentrically Braced Frame and Moment Resisting Frame Systems
Abstract
In earthquake-prone areas, the design of high-rise buildings must be carefully considered. Two of the most common systems used are the Moment Resisting Frame (MRF) and the Concentrically Braced Frame (CBF). The MRF system is the most common for multi-story buildings, where the entire load transfer is handled by the structure without lateral bracing. In contrast, the CBF system is considered better at withstanding seismic (earthquake) forces in high-rise applications. CBF consists of a series of beams and columns reinforced with concentrically placed bracing elements, which can resist lateral loads through axial action on the bracing elements. In the CBF system, the force centers of the bracing elements meet at a single point, ensuring efficient load distribution and predictable structural behavior. Additionally, using Concrete Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) as columns for high-rise buildings is very effective in resisting earthquake forces. This research modeled a 30-story 3D building structure. The slab structure used reinforced concrete elements with a quality of 40 MPa, the beams used Wide Flange (WF) sections, and the columns were Concrete Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) elements. The results showed that the CBF system is more effective in terms of serviceability. The structural mass of the CBF system is lower than that of the MRF, and the displacement and story drift in the CBF system have smaller values. This means the BF system is better at withstanding earthquake forces.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
R. Sabelli, C. W. Roeder, and J. F. Hajjar, “Seismic Design of Steel Special Concentrically Braced Frame Systems A Guide for Practicing Engineers,” no. 8, pp. 1–36, 2013.
A. Giroth, B. D. Handono, and S. O. Dapas, “Perencanaan Struktur Gedung Bertingkat Tahan Gempa Menggunakan Sistem Rangka Baja Terbreis Konsentris Khusus (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Di Kota Manado),” Tahun, vol. 22, no. 88, p. p-ISSN, 2024.
M. Aldaw, M. A. Ahmed Aldaw, and A. Suryadi, “Comparison Between Concentric Bracing Frame and Eccentric Bracing Frame in Earthquake-Resistant High-Rise Buildings,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 111–116, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380753083
R. K. P, “Disposable Knee Bracing in Combined Bracing System-Improvement in Seismic Design of Steel Frame using ETABS,” vol. 10, no. 06, pp. 170–179, 2022, [Online]. Available: www.ijert.org
N. Goswami, “A Review on the Analysis of Building with Different Types of Bracings,” Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 215–218, 2022, doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2022.40556.
A. Kanyilmaz, “Secondary frame action in concentrically braced frames designed for moderate seismicity: a full scale experimental study,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 15, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-0054-x.
M. Mahdavi, “Evaluating the Seismic Performance of Modern Concentrically Braces with the Finite Element Method,” Advance Researches in Civil Engineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 68–76, 2023, doi: 10.30469/ARCE.2024.449526.1070.
A. Janbandhu, P. Singh, K. R. Dabhekar, I. Khedikar, and J. V. Shukla, “Effect of Various Concentric Bracing in Building,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1193, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1193/1/012014.
Y. S. Yoganata, “ANALISIS PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN BRESING PADA STRUKTUR BANGUNAN BAJA 20 LANTAI,” 2023, JOS MRK, Malang.
P. Roshan, R. K. Meena, and I. Singh, “Analyzing the Effectiveness of Bracing Patterns in High-Rise Building,” Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, vol. 43, pp. 144–150, 2023, doi: 10.3233/ATDE230712.
H.-W. Gu et al., “Experimental study on seismic performance of CFST columns under ambient temperature effects,” ScienceDirect, vol. 493, no. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143018.
H. Chen, L. Wu, H. Jiang, and Y. Liu, “Seismic performance of prefabricated middle frame composed of special-shaped columns with built-in lattice concrete-filled circular steel pipes,” Elsevier Structure, vol. 34, pp. 1443–1457, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.062.
J. Y. R. Liew, M. Xiong, and D. Xiong, “Design of Concrete Filled Tubular Beam-columns with High Strength Steel and Concrete,” ScienceDirect, vol. 8 Part. 2, no. Structures, pp. 213–226, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2016.05.005.
Y. Zheng, Z. Lin, Y. Lin, and X. Zhang, “Eccentric compressive behavior of stiffened and multi-cell cross-shaped CFST columns under different loading angles,” ScienceDirect, no. Thin-Walled Structures, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2025.113903.
X. Li, S. Zhang, B. Song, and Z. Huang, “Eccentric compression behavior of CFST columns strengthened with steel tube and sandwiched grout jackets,” ScienceDirect, vol. 215, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2025.113565.
H. Huang, L. Guo, J. Chen, J. Li, and Z. Wang, “Axial compressive behavior of circular CFST stub columns with pitting corrosion,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 235, p. 109809, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.JCSR.2025.109809.
B. Zhang, “Challenges in the Application of Concentric Bracing for Tall Buildings: Structural Considerations,” Eng Struct, p. 257, 2023.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “Beban desain minimum dan Kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain 1727:2020,” Badan Standarisasi Nasional 1727:2020, no. 8, pp. 1–336, 2020.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj2579-891X.v24i2.23209
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jumlah Kunjungan:
Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil by Pusat Publikasi Ilmiah LPPM Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Based on work at https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/jats