NUMERICAL STUDY OF USING MULTI-DIRECTION ANGLE WIRE MESH AS A CONFINEMENT SYSTEM FOR CONFINED MASONRY UNDER HORIZONTAL CYCLIC LOADS

Muhammad Rifat Hidayat, Ahmad Basshofi Habieb, Wahyuniarih Sutrisno

Abstract


Indonesia was located in a seismically active region and was situated between three tectonic plates. The construction resilience that met the requirements was necessary in earthquake-prone areas. The purpose was to protect and reduce the risk of severe damage caused by significant seismic loads. However, more than 70% of buildings in developing countries like Indonesia utilized the Confined Masonry (CM) structural system. The implementation of CM systems in Indonesia often led to fatal damages during earthquakes. Due to the severity of these damages, the addition of reinforcement systems to CM became one of the options to address the shortcomings of the CM system. There were various types of materials that could be used as reinforcement, such as steel cages, polymers, polypropylene bands, bamboo meshes, and plastic materials. This study investigated the utilization of ferrocement layers as reinforcement material for CM structural system panels. The specimen panels used had a width of 2300 mm and a height of 1370 mm. The specimens in the research were numerically modeled using the ABAQUS/explicit program. The research variation focused on the influence of the wiremesh sheet orientation angle. The number of variations for the ferrocement layer was one layer with angle configurations of 0, 45, and 60 degrees. This reinforcement layer was applied to one side of the CM panel. As a comparison, results from the control specimen were included. The hysteresis curve, energy dissipation, stiffness degradation, and damage patterns were evaluated in this research.


Keywords


confined masonry; retrofitting; ferrocement; numerical analysis; simplified-micro model; in-plane loading seismic; direction angle wiremesh

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Banerjee, S. Nayak, and S. Das, “Enhancing shear capacity of masonry wallet using PP-band and steel wire mesh,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 431, no. 7, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/431/7/072004.

T. Boen, “Earthquake resistant design of non-engineered buildings in Indonesia,” EQTAP Conf., pp. 1–34, 2001.

S. A. A. Gumilang and M. Rusli, “Seismic performance of earthquake resistant simple residential confined masonry house structure based on permen PUPR No.5 of 2016 specification,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 708, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/708/1/012085.

R. Meli, “Behaviour of Masonry Walls Under Lateral Loads,” Res. Profr. Inst. Eng. Natl. Univ. Mex., p. 10, 1973.

S. M. Alcocer, “Comportamiento sísmico de estructuras de mampostería.,” Soc. Mex. Ing. Sísmica, A.C, p. 28, 1996, [Online]. Available: https://reconstruir.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/4_comportamiento_sismico_de_estructuras_de_mamposteria_una_revision.pdf

M. Yekrangnia, A. Bakhshi, and A. Ghannad, “Force-displacement model for solid confined masonry walls with shear-dominated failure mode,” Pacific Conf. Earthq. Eng., no. 056, pp. 1–6, 2017, doi: 10.1002/eqe.

K. Meguro, “Technological and Social Approaches To Achieve Earthquake Safer Non-Engineered Houses,” 14Wcee, 2008.

J. W. De Santis, “Seismic performance of masonry walls retrofitted with steel reinforced grout,” Pacific Conf. Earthq. Eng., no. 056, pp. 1–6, 2015, doi: 10.1002/eqe.

M. Bruneau, “Seismic evaluation of unreinforced masonry buildings — a state-of-the-art report,” vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 512–539, 1994, doi: 10.1139/l94-054.

B. Kondraivendhan and B. Pradhan, “Effect of ferrocement confinement on behavior of concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1218–1222, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.004.

A. Chourasia, S. Singhal, and J. Parashar, “Experimental investigation of seismic strengthening technique for confined masonry buildings,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 25, no. June, p. 100834, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100834.

O. Lalaj, Y. Yardım, and S. Yılmaz, “Recent perspectives for ferrocement,” Res. Eng. Struct. Mater., vol. 1, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.17515/resm2015.04st0123.

H. Shakib, S. Dardaei, M. Mousavi, and M. K. Rezaei, “Experimental and Analytical Evaluation of Confined Masonry Walls Retrofitted with CFRP Strips and Mesh-Reinforced PF Shotcrete,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1–11, 2016, doi: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000885.

K. F. Abdulla, L. S. Cunningham, and M. Gillie, “Simulating masonry wall behaviour using a simplified micro-model approach,” Eng. Struct., vol. 151, pp. 349–365, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.021.

B. Borah, H. B. Kaushik, and V. Singhal, “Finite Element Modelling of Confined Masonry Wall under In-plane Cyclic Load,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 936, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/936/1/012020.

U. M. D. E. C. D. E. Los, Non Linear Mechanic of Reinforced Concrete. Spon Press Taylor and Frac, 2003.

M. Labibzadeh, “Damaged-plasticity concrete model identification for prediction the effects of CFRPs on strengthening the weakened RC two-way slabs with central, lateral and corner openings,” Int. J. Struct. Eng., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 240–268, 2015, doi: 10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2015.070721.

M. Labibzadeh, M. Zakeri, and A. Adel Shoaib, “A new method for CDP input parameter identification of the ABAQUS software guaranteeing uniqueness and precision,” Int. J. Struct. Integr., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 264–284, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJSI-03-2016-0010.

G. P. A. G. van Zijl, “Improved mechanical performance: Shear behaviour of strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC),” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1241–1247, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.04.009.

H. B. Kaushik, D. C. Rai, and S. K. Jain, “Stress-Strain Characteristics of Clay Brick Masonry under Uniaxial Compression,” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 728–739, 2007, doi: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728).

K. Park, G. H. Paulino, and J. R. Roesler, “Determination of the kink point in the bilinear softening model for concrete,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 75, no. 13, pp. 3806–3818, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.002.

P. B. Lourenco, J. G. Rots, and J. Blaauwendraad, “Two approaches for the analysis of masonry structures,” Heron, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 313–340, 1995, [Online]. Available: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:c39b29ab-3c75-47db-9cb5-bf2b1c678f1f

R. D. S. G. Campilho, M. F. S. F. de Moura, and J. J. M. S. Domingues, “Using a cohesive damage model to predict the tensile behaviour of CFRP single-strap repairs,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1497–1512, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.003.

P. P. Camanho and C. G. Davila, “Mixed-Mode Decohesion Finite Elements for the Simulation of Delamination in Composite Materials,” NASA Tech. Pap., vol. 211737, no. June, p. 42, 2002, [Online]. Available: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.8.267&rep=rep1&type=pdf

H. P. KLOTZ, G. OUTZEKOVSKY, and H. ELMALEH, “Etude De La Fonction Parathyrouidienne Dans Un Cas De Scl’Erodermie. Effets Th’Erapeutiques De La Parathormone.,” Ann. Endocrinol. (Paris)., vol. 24, pp. 859–865, 1963.

M. Deng and S. Yang, “Experimental and numerical evaluation of confined masonry walls retrofitted with engineered cementitious composites,” Eng. Struct., vol. 207, no. January, p. 110249, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110249.

A. Rahgozar and A. Hosseini, “Experimental and numerical assessment of in-plane monotonic response of ancient mortar brick masonry,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 155, pp. 892–909, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.079.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j20861206.v38i2.17405

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Journal of Civil Engineering is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats