Ensemble Physics of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model for Predicting Heavy Rainfall in the Bandung area, West Java

Abdul Hamid Al Habib, Fathan Ilham Ramadhani, Nurjanna J. Trilaksono

Abstract


The complex topography of the Bandung region, with the presence of mountains and valleys, can affect air flow patterns and rainfall distribution. Accurate weather predictions and spatial precision are crucial for anticipating the impacts of heavy rainfall. This study aims to evaluate the capability of the WRF physics ensemble prediction system in forecasting heavy rainfall events in the Bandung region. The use of an ensemble prediction system is a viable approach to quantifying uncertainty in numerical weather prediction and provide more reliable information. The case study used is the heavy rainfall event that caused flooding on October 4, 2022, in the Pagarsih area. Global Forecasting System (GFS) data with a spatial resolution of 0.25 x 0.25 and a temporal resolution of three hours were used as input for downscaling in the WRF-ARW model. This study used 9 configuration schemes of the WRF-ARW model parameterization as ensemble members. The results of the study indicate that the WRF model (a combination of the Purdue Lin, Yonsei University Scheme, and Betts-Miller-Janjic Scheme) provided the most accurate heavy rainfall prediction, with an RMSE value of 2.13. The probability maps of rainfall products can effectively identify peak heavy rainfall between 1:00 PM- 4:00 PM. This is indicated by the large area with a greater than 90% probability of rainfall exceeding 10 mm. The ensemble mean product of rainfall predictions tends to underestimate heavy rainfall in the Pagarsih area. The ensemble mean product of surface air temperature can effectively identify the pattern of observational f luctuations with a low RMSE value (0.77), and the ensemble mean product of surface layer air humidity can identify the pattern of observational fluctuations with a relatively high RMSE value (13.28).

Keywords


Ensemble; Parameterization; WRF-ARW; Forecast; Rainfall

Full Text:

PDF

References


D.R. Easterling, et al., ”Observed variability and trends in ex

treme climate events,” A brief review. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,

vol. 81, p. 417-425, 2000.

L.V. Alexander, et al., ”Global observed changes in daily

climate extremes of temperature and precipitation,” J. Geo

phys., vol. 111, D05109, p. 1-22, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1029/

JD006290

D. Coumou, S. Rahmstorf, ”A decade of weather extremes,”

Nat. Clim. Chang., vol. 2, p. 491-496, 2012.

W. Ingram, ”Extreme precipitation: Increases all round,” Nat.

Clim. Chang., vol. 6, p. 443-444, 2016.

I. Yucel, et al., ”Calibration and evaluation of a flood forecast

ing system: Utility of numerical weather prediction model, data

assimilation and satellite-based rainfall,” Journal of Hydrology,

vol. 523, p. 49-66, 2015.

B. Bulut, M. T. Yilmaz, et al., ”Evaluation of Remotely-Sensed

and Model-Based Soil Moisture Products According to Differ

ent Soil Type, Vegetation Cover and Climate Regime Using

Station-Based Observations over Turkey,” Remote Sensing, vol.

, no. 16, p. 1875, 2019

M. Amjad, et al., ”Performance evaluation of satellite- and

model-based precipitation products over varying climate and

complex topography,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 584, 124707,

A.F. Prein, et al., ”A review on regional convectionpermitting

climate modeling: Demonstrations, prospects, and challenges,”

Reviews of geophysics, vol. 53, no. 2, p. 323-361, 2015.

I. Yucel, and A. Onen, ”Evaluating a mesoscale atmosphere

model and a satellite-based algorithm in estimating extreme

rainfall events in northwestern Turkey,” Natural Hazards and

Earth System Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 611-624, 2014.

F. Xie, H. He, and Y. Zhang, ”Evaluation of simulation results

for different parameterization schemes of land process,” J. An

hui Agric. Sci., vol. 44, p. 210-215, 2016.

Q. Yang, et al., ”Performance of the WRF model in simulating

intense precipitation events over the Hanjiang River Basin, Chi

naA multi-physics ensemble approach,” Atmos. Res., vol. 248,

, 2021.

W.A. Gallus, ”Application of object-based verification tech

niques to ensemble precipitation forecasts,” Weather Forecast.,

vol. 25, p. 144-158, 2010.

J. Wei, et al., ”Role of reservoir regulation and groundwater

feedback in a simulated ground-soil-vegetation continuum: A

long-term regional scale analysis,” Hydrol. Process., vol. 35,

no. 8, 2021.

S. Joslyn, and S. Savelli, ”Communicating Forecast Uncer

tainty: Public Perception of Weather Forecast Uncertainty,”

Royal Meteorology Society, vol. 17, p. 180-195, 2010.

S. Joslyn, and J.E. Le Clerc, ”Uncertainty Forecast Improve

Weather Related Decisions and Attenuate the Effects of Fore

cast Error,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 18, no. 1,

p. 126-140, 2012.

E. Kessler, ”On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Sub

stance in Atmospheric Circulations. In: On the Distribution and

Continuity of Water Substance in Atmospheric Circulations.

Meteorological Monographs,” American Meteorological Soci

ety, Boston, MA., 10, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704

-2-1, 1969.

G.A. Grell, and D. Dvnyi, ”A generalized approach to pa

rameterizing convection combining ensemble and data as

similation techniques,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 29, no. 14,

doi:10.1029/2002GL015311, 2002.

J. Jeworrek, G. West, and R. Stull, ”WRF Precipitation Perfor

mance and Predictability for Systematically Varied Parameter

izations over Complex Terrain,” Wea. Forecasting, vol. 36, p.

-913, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0195.1, 2021




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj24604682.v21i1.20986

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.