Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Covers

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics

Autors Task

1. Standard article
   The author must present accurate original articles about the process of work carried out and present objective discussions. In the article, data must be displayed accurately. Articles must contain sufficient details and references so other people can develop research. Deliberate false or inaccurate statements are unethical and unacceptable behavior.
2. Access to Data
   Under certain conditions, at the request of the editor, the author is asked to provide raw data in connection with the review process, the author must be prepared to provide access to the editor of the data.
3. Authenticity and plagiarism
   The author must ensure that their work is completely authentic, and if the author has used the work and / or words of others that have been quoted or quoted appropriately.
   
4. Double publication
   A writer should not publish a text that descriptively describes the same research in more than one journal or other publication. Sending the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is an unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.
5. Recognition Source:
   The author must always acknowledge the work that has been made by someone else. The author must quote publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the article submitted.
6. About Article Authors
   The author's name stated is limited only to those who have contributed significantly to the concept, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research reported. All people who have made significant contributions must be registered as writers. If there are other people who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The author who corresponds with the editor must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and inappropriate co-authors are included in the article and that all co-authors have seen and agreed to the latest version of the article and have agreed to submit it for publication.
7. Conflict of Interest:
   All authors must disclose in their manuscripts any financial problems or other substantive conflicts of interest that can be interpreted to influence the results or interpretation of their text. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.
8. Basic errors in published works:
   When a writer finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his own published work, it is the duty of the author to notify the journal editor or publisher immediately and work with the editor to recall or correct the text.

Editor Task

1. Justice:
   An editor at any time evaluates texts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, religion, ethnic origin, nationality or political flow of the authors.
2. Confidentiality:
   The editor and every editorial staff are prohibited from providing any information about the manuscript sent to anyone other than the author, sustainable partner, editorial board and other publishers.
3. Conflict of Interest:
   Unpublished material written in the submitted text may not be used in the editor's own research without the author's written consent.
4. Publication Decision:
   Journal editors are responsible for determining which articles are published. Editors can request input from the editorial board of the journal and the tools available to overcome copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can discuss with other editors and reviewers to make this decision.
5. Script Review:
   The editor must ensure that each text is evaluated by the editor in relation to originality. Editors must manage and use reviewers fairly and wisely. The editor must explain the peer review process as information for the author and also indicate which parts of the journal are reviewed by the reviewer. Editors must use peer reviewers that are appropriate for articles that are considered to be published by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding conflicts of interest.

Reviewer Task

1. Contributions to Editorial Decisions:
   Reviewers assist editors in making editorial decisions. Through communication between editors and writers, reviewers can also help authors improve articles.
2. Speed:
   Each selected reviewer who feels he is not eligible to review the manuscript must notify the editor and withdraw from the review process
3. Standard Objectivity:
   The review process must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism for the author is inappropriate. Reviewers must express their views clearly and be accompanied by supporting arguments.
4. Confidentiality:
   Each text received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be shown or discussed with others except those authorized by the editor.
5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:
   New information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers must work professionally and get rid of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative or other relationships with any author, company or institution related to the article.
6. Source Recognition
   Reviewers must identify relevant publications that have not been quoted by the author. Each statement in the form of an observation, decline, or previously published argument must be accompanied by a relevant quote. A reviewer must also discuss with the editor the substantial or overlapping similarities between the text being reviewed and other published articles.

Focus And Scope

 The scope of the topic of writing includes the following topics :

•       Functions of Infrastructure & Facilities
•       Requests for Infrastructure & Facilities
•       Behavior Demand for Infrastructure & Facilities
•       User Behavior of Infrastructure & Facilities
•       Evaluation of Infrastructure & Facilities
•       Infrastructure & Facilities Policy
•       Infrastructure Planning & Facilities
•       Infrastructure Operating Systems & Facilities
•       Infrastructure & Facilities Maintenance System
•       Removal of Infrastructure & Facilities
•       Economic Infrastructure & Facilities
•       Infrastructure & Facility Financing
•       Infrastructure & Facilities Management Organization
•       Spatial & Environmental Infrastructure & Facilities Aspects

Review Process

The review process is as follows :

- The entry script
- Manuscript Formed by the Secretariat
- Manuscript reviewed by the Editorial Board
- Manuscript Review by Reviewer
- Manuscripts are decided to be accepted for publication
- Manuscript Returned
- Improved manuscript