Numerical Study of Airfoil Selection and Analysis of 3D Flow Phenomenon past Finite-Span Wings for Small UAVs

Fauzi Perdana, Sutardi Sutardi

Abstract


Small unmanned aerial vehicle (SUAV) is an unmanned aircraft vehicle (UAV) that flies at an altitude of lower than 1,100 m from the ground, has a maximum gross takeoff weight of 10 kg, and a flight speed of less than 50 m/s. One of the design factors for the small UAV design with a fixed-wing propeller is the airfoil selection. The selection of an airfoil profile using aerodynamic concepts leads to a performance coefficient that determines the selected airfoil’s sustainability and efficiency. The coefficients used are CL, CD, and CM. Numerical studies were carried out using Computational Fluid Dynamics using XFLR5 and ANSYS Fluent 19.1 software to evaluate airfoils in 2D and evaluate the phenomenon of induced drag on the wings in 3D. Airfoil selection was made on five types of airfoils: AH 83-150 Q, E399, E431, E715, and E662. The coefficients of CL, CD, and CM were obtained by varying α. 3D analysis of selected airfoil geometry with finite span. Simulation of steady conditions using Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes (RANS) in the Spalart-Allmaras turbulent model with variations of α = 0 ◦ , 8◦ , 12◦ , and 16◦ . The post-processor visualized the flow around the wing with pressure contours, velocity pathlines, and tip vortices. The analysis was carried out on the aerodynamic coefficients of CL, CD, CM, and CMr with α variation on the finite span wing. Based on the research, the results showed that the selected airfoil was E431, the aerodynamic performance of the CL, CD, CL/CD, CM, and CMr wings. In addition, information was also obtained regarding a decrease in the pressure difference between the upper surface and lower surface of the wing with an increasing span, 3D streamline, the extent of the contour of the vorticity magnitude, and a streamline on the wingtip on the upper surface and lower surface of the wing.


Keywords


Airfoil; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Induced drag; UAV; Trailing vortex

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. A. Rocha and L. E. Solaque, “Education and de velopment of unmanned aerial systems,” 2 nd IFAC Workshop on Research. Compiegne, France., 2013.

T. Goetzendorf-Grabowski, A. Frydrychewicz, Z. Goraj, and S. Suchodolski, “MALE UAV design of an increased reliability level,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, p. 226–235, 2006.

P. Panagiotou, P. Kaparos, and K. Yakinthos, “Winglet design and optimization for a MALE UAV using CFD,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 39, pp. 190– 205, 2014.

M. Selig, “UIUC airfoil coordinates database,” Aug. 2017.

F. Perdana, “Laporan kerja praktek PT. Dirgantara In donesia: Desain airfoil konvensional pada Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Medium Altitude Long Endurance (UAV MALE) menggunakan software XFLR5,” 2017.

J. Morgado, R. Vizinho, M. Silvestre, and J. Páscoa, “XFOIL vs CFD performance predictions for high lift low Reynolds number airfoils,” Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016.

T. Kim, “NaBH4 (Sodium Borohydride) hydrogen gen erator with a volume-exchange fuel tank for small unmanned aerial vehicles powered by a PEM (Pro ton Exchange Membrane) fuel cell,” Journal Energy, pp. 1–7, 2014.

P. Panagiotou, S. Fotiadis-Karras, and K. Yakinthos, “Conceptual design of a blended wing body MALE UAV,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 73, pp. 32–47, 2018.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j25807471.v4i1.9364

Creative Commons License
JMES The International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) ITS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/jmes.