ELDERLY SPATIAL IDEALS AND COMFORT IN DOMESTIC SPACE USE: A STUDY OF BUGIS VERNACULAR HOUSING
Abstract
With increasing age, elderly individuals experience declines in physical and cognitive functions, requiring adaptations in their daily activities and living environments. In rural contexts, elderly residents often maintain strong adherence to cultural values and traditional housing practices, adjusting their activities and bodily abilities rather than modifying the spatial configuration of their homes. One group that continues to inhabit vernacular houses is the Bugis community in Tolitoli, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. This study aims to examine the relationship between the health conditions of rural elderly and their spatial ideals and comfort in using domestic spaces within Bugis vernacular houses. The research employed a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative methods (participant observation and in-depth interviews) and quantitative methods (questionnaire survey analyzed through cross-tabulation and Fisher's Exact Test). The qualitative findings reveal that elderly residents hold strong spatial ideals rooted in cultural familiarity, which inform how they adapt to domestic spaces amid declining health conditions. Rather than modifying spatial configurations, elderly residents adjust their daily activities in alignment with their existing spatial ideals and accumulated spatial knowledge. Three aspects of spatial quality were identified as relevant to this adaptive process: personal safety, sensory comfort, and functionalities of space. Personal safety is especially significant for elderly with cognitive impairments, while sensory comfort, particularly tactile perception, plays a key role for those with visual impairments. Functionalities of space support elderly independence by enabling mobility and daily activity management within the domestic environment. The quantitative findings further indicate that health conditions relate significantly to two spatial comfort aspects: room size and floor surface texture, both corresponding to personal safety and sensory comfort needs. Overall, the findings suggest that the health conditions of rural elderly relate to their spatial ideals and comfort in nuanced ways, shaped by long-term cultural familiarity with the vernacular dwelling environment.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ang, S.K. (2013) ‘Health and ageing’, Brunei International Medical Journal, 9(2), pp. 141–143. doi: 10.3280/we2018-002002.
Arifuddin (2016) ‘Cultural and needs-based housing development case study: The Bugis community in Makassar City’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, pp. 300–308. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.075.
Carstens, D.Y. (1993) Site planning and design for the elderly: Issues, guidelines, and alternatives. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, Y. et al. (2025) ‘Indoor comfort domains and well-being of older adults in residential settings: A scoping review’, Building and Environment, 267, p. 112268. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112268.
Coolen, H. (2016) The meaning of dwelling features.
Creswell, J.W. and Clark, V.L.P. (2017) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Daeng, H. (2000) Manusia, kebudayaan, dan lingkungan: Tinjauan antropologis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Denzin, N.K. (2008) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2017) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Fallah Tafti, F., Rollo, J. and McGann, S. (2026) ‘Conceptualising a model for understanding socio-cultural and spatial factors in housing: Insights from a systematic scoping review’, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 15(1), pp. 119–143. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2025.05.005.
Feng, I. et al. (2018) ‘Assessment of and improvement strategies for the housing of healthy elderly: Improving quality of life’, Sustainability, 10(3), p. 722. doi: 10.3390/su10030722.
Fernández-Portero, C., Alarcón, D. and Barrios Padura, Á. (2017) ‘Dwelling conditions and life satisfaction of older people through residential satisfaction’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.11.003.
Field, A. (2018) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. London: SAGE Publications.
Froehlich-Grobe, K. et al. (2008) ‘Physical access in urban public housing facilities’, Disability and Health Journal, 1(1), pp. 25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2007.11.003.
Gitlin, L.N. (2003) ‘Next steps in home modification and assistive technology research’, in Impact of technology on successful aging, pp. 188–202.
Gray, M. (2017) ‘Applied qualitative research design: A total framework approach’.
Gutman, J. (2012) ‘Categorization processes’, 46(2), pp. 60–72.
Hanley, I. and Hodge, J. (1984) Psychological approaches to the care of the elderly. London: Croom Helm.
Jaul, E. and Barron, J. (2017) ‘Age-related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population’, Frontiers in Public Health, 5, p. 335.
Kopec, D. (2018) Environmental psychology for design. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Kristiadi, A. and Sabatini, S.N. (2025) ‘Elderly behavior setting to responding eruption disaster at the Tresna Werdha Social Service Center, Pakembinangun’, Journal of Architecture & Environment, 24(2), pp. 203–222.
Lang, J. (1987) Creating architectural theory: The role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Loo, B.P.Y. et al. (2017) ‘Walking, neighbourhood environment and quality of life among older people’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 25, pp. 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.005.
Nriagu, J., Smith, P. and Socier, D. (2011) ‘A rating scale for housing-based health hazards’, Science of the Total Environment, 409(24), pp. 5423–5431. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.018.
Ping, Y. and Xiaohua, W. (2012) ‘Risk factors for accidental falls in the elderly and intervention strategy’, Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA, 27(5), pp. 299–305. doi: 10.1016/S1000-1948(12)60039-2.
Qin, B. et al. (2024) ‘Understanding the relationship between neighbourhood built environment and older adults’ health from the perspective of housing differentiation’, Health & Social Care in the Community, 2024(1), p. 3065803. doi: 10.1155/2024/3065803.
Rapoport, A. (1983) ‘Development, culture change and supportive design’, Habitat International, 7(5), pp. 249–268. doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(83)90076-0.
Rapoport, A. (2005) Culture, architecture, and design. Chicago: Locke Science Publishing Company.
Rapoport, A. (2005) Culture, architecture and design [PDF].
Rives Bogart, K. and Matsumoto, D. (2010) ‘Facial mimicry is not necessary to recognize emotion: Facial expression recognition by people with Moebius syndrome’, Social Neuroscience, 5(2), pp. 241–251.
Rudwiarti, L.A. and Vitasurya, V.R. (2020) ‘Contributing social safety and security for elderly-friendly environment: Case study of Brayut Tourism Village, Yogyakarta, Indonesia’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 452(1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012077.
Sakinah, P.N., Hayati, A. and Faqih, M. (2023) Continuity of housing expression based on the elderly Bugis culture. Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Salim, A., Salik, Y. and Wekke, I.S. (2018) ‘Pendidikan karakter dalam masyarakat Bugis’, Ijtimaiyya: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 11(1), pp. 41–62.
Spradley, J.P. (2016) The ethnographic interview. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Van Swearingen, J.M. et al. (1998) ‘Psychological distress’, Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 118(6), pp. 790–796. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70270-0.
World Health Organization (WHO) (1998) WHO report.
Xian, G.E. and Defiana, I. (2023) ‘Place ideal for aging care: Detached house wellbeing’, Journal of Architecture & Environment, 22(2), pp. 225–236.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj2355262x.v25i1.a23527
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexing and Abstracting :

Journal of Architecture & Environment is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License






