Space Experiences of Women with Visual Impairment in Domestic Architecture

Indrati Prastiti, Arina Hayati, Murni Rachmawati

Abstract


Domestic space is where basic human needs are accommodated and understood to the function and its inhabitants. The basic understanding of using domestic space is human activities as a system of activity and areas as a system of settings. However, visual representation techniques in architecture have led to the discriminatory practices towards visually impaired who have limitations on the sense of sight as a primary tool in spatial perception. Thus, studies are necessary to explore the use of domestic space by visually impaired. This paper aims to study the experience of people with visually impaired doing their activities and using a domestic architecture based on the cognition and percetption of their senses. This phenomenological research is studied at the natural setting of domestic housing from the perspective of women with visual impairment who live in Surabaya. The participants are chosen who have actively and independently carried their daily activities in domestic space. The results of this study show women with visual impairment have a specific system of activities and system of settings related to how the senses affect the spatial behavior of visually impaired in accommodating their activities. By doing so, they are able to compromise and create a friendly and accessible domestic environment.

Keywords


Domestic Space; The Use of Space; System of Activity; Blind Women; Housing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Oswald, D. (1987). The Organization of Space in Residential Buildings: a Cross-Cultural Perspective. in Kent, S. (ed.) Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: an Etnoarcheological Approach. Columbia University Press, New York.

Rapoport, A. (1990). Systems of Activities and Systems of Settings. In S. Kent (Ed.), Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space (pp. 9-20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches: SAGE Publications.

Hemingway, L. (2011). Disabled People and Housing: Choices, Opportunities and Barriers: Policy Press.

Lakoff, George. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind

and its challenge to Western thought / George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. New York, N.Y: Basic Books.

Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook: SAGE Publications.

Surakhmad, W. (1994). Pengantar penelitian ilmiah: dasar, metode dan teknik: Tarsito.

Imrie, Rob. (1998). Focusing on Disability and Access in the Built Environment. Disability & Society, 13(3), 357-374. doi: 10.1080/09687599826687.

Oliver, Mike. (1992). Changing the Social Relations of Research Production? (Vol. 7).

Rapoport, Amos. (1998). Using “Culture” in Housing Design. Housing and Society, 25(1-2), 1-20. doi: 10.1080/08882746.1998.11430282.

Sixsmith, Judith. (1986). The meaning of home: An exploratory study of environmental experience (Vol. 6).

Branham, Stacy M., & Kane, Shaun K. (2015). Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Basyazici, Burcin. (2013). A phenomenological study of spatial experiences without sight and critique of visual dominance in architecture.

Hidayatun, M. I. (2008). Hakekat Ruang Dalam Arsitektur Tradisional Sebagai Satu Bentuk Jawaban Dari Tantangan Alam (Studi Tentang Arsitektur Tradisional Vernakular),. Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional Jelajah Arsitektur Tradisional Nusantara Dalam Menemukenali Teknologis Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Makassar.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i6.11120

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.