Evaluating the Success of E-Invoice Implementation at a State-Owned Enterprise Using DeLone & McLean IS Success Model

Debbie Amalina, Erma Suryani

Abstract


E-Invoice considered as one of the most implemented financial information systems these recent years. E-Invoice had grown from a system that brings convenience, into a part of the strategy to fulfill corporate expectation. However, it’s uncertain whether E-Invoice implementation indeed successfully brings proven benefits into the company business. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify the indicators that affect the success of E-Invoice implementation in a particular state-owned company, based upon DeLone & McLean IS Success Model. In terms of evaluation, previous research regarding E-Invoice mostly discussed about the key factors that influence the adoption of E-Invoice. Lesser literatures purposed at studying the success of the implementation, related to the system performance. According to DeLone & McLean IS Success Model, there are six variables used as basic measurement, namely information quality, system quality, service quality, user satisfaction, intention to use, and net benefits. Following that, a set of structured questionnaire arranged and distributed to 34 users of an E-Invoice system provided by a state-owned enterprise headquartered in Rembang, Indonesia, including vendors and employees. The data then will be processed using Partial Least Square (PLS) method. The result showed that Information Quality and System Quality gave significant impact to User Satisfaction and User Satisfaction gave significant impact to Net Benefits. Meanwhile, Service Quality is not proven empirically to gave significant impact to both User Satisfaction and Intention to Use.

Keywords


DeLone & McLean IS Success Model; E-Invoice; Financial Information System; Information System Evaluation; Partial Least Square

Full Text:

PDF

References


. A. A. N. Mostafa and B. Eneizan, “Factors Affecting Acceptance of Mobile Banking in Developing Countries,” J. HOMEPAGE Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 340–351, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3812.

. N. Vrček and I. Magdalenić, “Methodology and software components for e-business development and implementation: Case of introducing e-invoice in public sector and SMEs,” J. Cases Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 39–61, 2011, doi: 10.4018/jcit.2011070103.

. C.-J. Chang, H.-C. Kuo, C.-Y. Chen, T.-H. Chen, and F.-Y. Chung, “Ergonomic Techniques for a Mobile E-Invoice System: Operational Requirements of an Information Management System,” Hum. Factos Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1–8, 2012, doi: 10.1002/hfm.

. N. Tait, Brussels Strengthens “Invoicing.” FT.com, 2009.

. M. Fieschi, Health data processing: Systemic approaches. London UK  ;Kidlington Oxford UK: Elsevier, 2018.

. M. Rahmi, “Pengaruh Penggunaa Teknologi Informasi dan Keahlian Pemakai Terhadap Kualitas Informasi Akuntansi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan BUMN di Kota Padang),” J. Akunt., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–23, Jun. 2013.

. W. H. Delone and E. R. McLean, “Information System Successs: The Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60–95, 1992, doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60.

. N. Urbach and B. Muller, “The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success,” Integr. Ser. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 28, pp. 1–18, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2.

. H. H. Alshibly, “Human Resources Information Systems success Assessment: An integrative model,” Aust. J. Basic, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 157–169, 2011, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1795.7288.

. B. Hernandez-Ortega, “Key Factors for The Adoption and Subsequent Use of E-Invoicing,” Rev. Latinoam. Adm., vol. 50, pp. 15–30, 2012.

. Eurpean Commision Expert Group, “Mid-Term Report of the European Commission Expert Group on e-Invoicing,” 2009.

. E. Penttinen and M. Hyytiainen, “The Adoption of Electronic Invoicing in Finnish Private and Public Organizations,” Finland, 2008.

. J. W. Lian, “Critical factors for cloud based e-invoice service adoption in Taiwan: An empirical study,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 98–109, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.005.

. H. B. Seta, T. Wati, A. Muliawati, and A. N. Hidayanto, “E-learning success model: An extention of delone & mclean is’ success model,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 281~291, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijeei.v6i3.505.

. I. Wagimin, P. Ninghardjanti, and K. Kritistiani, “Success Model of Learning by e-Learning in Higher Education,” Indones. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 16, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.26858/IJES.V16I1.3971.

. H. Roky and Y. Al Meriouh, “Evaluation by Users of an Industrial Information System (XPPS) Based on the DeLone and McLean Model for IS Success,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 26, pp. 903–913, 2015, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00903-x.

. N. Adroni and M. Sitorus, “Evaluation of Badix Information System Implementation Success in Telkomsel Region of Sumbagsel using DeLone & McLean Model,” Int. J. Bus. Econ. Aff., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 211–219, 2017, doi: 10.24088/IJBEA-2017-23006.

. P. Yu and S. Qian, “Developing a theoretical model and questionnaire survey instrument to measure the success of electronic health records in residential aged care,” journals.plos.org, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190749.

. Budiyanto, “Evaluasi Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi dengan Pendekatan Model Delone dan Mclean (Studi Kasus Implementasi Billing System Di RSUD Kabupaten Sragen),” Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Surakarta, 2009.

. I. Ghozali, “Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square,” Semarang, 2008.

. I. Ghozali and Fuad, Structural equation modeling: teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan Program LISREL 8.80. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2014.

. W. Abdillah and J. Hartono, Partial Least Square (PLS): alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam penelitian bisnis . Yogyakarta: Andi, 2015.

. J. F. Hair, T. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). New York: Sage Publication, Inc., 2013.

. H. H. Alshibly, “Evaluating E-HRM success: A Validation of the Information Systems Success Model,” Int. J. Hum. Resour. Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 107–124, 2014, doi: 10.5296/ijhrs.v4i3.5929.

. J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2011, doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.

. J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and R. R. Sinkovics, “The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing,” Adv. Int. Mark., vol. 20, no. 2009, pp. 277–319, 2009, doi: 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014.

. A. Rai, S. S. Lang, and R. B. Welker, “Assessing the validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 50–69, 2002, doi: 10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96.

. J. H. Wu and Y. M. Wang, “Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model,” Inf. Manag., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 728–739, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002.

. J. Iivari, “An Empirical Test of The DeLone-McLean Model of Information System Success,” Data Base Adv. Inf. Syst., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 8–27, 2005, doi: 10.1145/1066149.1066152.

. Y.-S. Wang and Y.-W. Liao, “Assessing eGovernment Systems Success: A Validation of The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 25, pp. 717–733, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002.

. M. Gelderman, “The Relation Between User Satisfaction, Usage of Information Systems and Performance,” Inf. Manag., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00044-5




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i1.11937

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.