Influence of Surcharge Loading, Retained Soil and Restrained Soil on Design of Diaphragm Wall

Nu Nu Win, Nyan Myint Kyaw, Khin Than Yu

Abstract


Many different types of embedded retaining wall are constructed due to the increasing demands. In Yangon, Myanmar is encountered deep excavation problem. Many buildings are damaged due to excavation of adjacent building. Therefore, embedded retaining wall as excavation support system is necessary to be sustainable buildings. There are important that influence of surcharge loading, retained soil and restrained soil on design of embedded retaining wall.  In this paper, diaphragm Wall is emphasized and solved using soil structure interaction analysis. Behaviour of diaphragm Wall wall is based on various factors. Consider with natural and increasing of shear strength parameter of retained and restrained soils to get the level of the dredge line is stiff soil and various distances from wall to surcharge. Sites are located in urban setting, there are near building and separately from main structure. This project involves the construction of 5 m depth retaining wall. In case study (A) retained soils is soft, medium (low) clay, restrained soil is mostly cohesive soil. There are medium (low), stiff, medium, hard soil layers.  In case studies (B to H) are increasing shear strength parameter of retained soil and restrained soil. All cases are considered with various distances from wall to surcharge. According to the soil conditions and distance from wall to surcharge, Wall depth, horizontal and vertical movement of ground and wall deflection are described. When retained and restrained soil reach stiff condition, then ground movement and wall deflection reach acceptable limit and wall depth become more safe and economical condition.


Keywords


shear strength parameter; wall depth; deep excavation; horizontal and vertical movement; wall deflection; soil conditions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asim Gaba, Brain Simpson, William Powrie., David Beadman, “Embedded Retaining Walls-Guidance for Economic Design” London. 2003. UK.

“Code of practice for Earth Retaining Structures” BS 8002: 1994

Braja M.Das. California State University, Sacramento. “Principles of Foundation Engineering” Seven Edition, United State of America. 2011.

Chang Yu Ou Department of construction Engineering,

National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, “Deep Excavation Theory and Practice” 2006,taylor & Francis Group, London,UK

James K. Mitchell, Kenichi Soga. “Fundamentals of soil behavior “ —3rd ed, 2005

R.F Craig. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Dundee. “Soil Mechanics”, Six Edition, UK. 1990. 1990.

Braja M.Das. California State University, Sacramento.. “Principles of Geotechnical Engineering,” Eight Edition, United State of America. 2014

Shamsher Prakash, Professor of Civil Engineering, University of Missouri- Rolla, Harid.Sharma, Chief Geotechnical Engineer, Emcon Associates, San Jose, California. “Pile Foundations in Engineering Practice”, United State of America. 1990.

Joseph E.Bowles, P.E., S.E.. “Foundation Analysis and Design”. Fifth Edition, United State of America. 1977

LYMON C. REESE,WILLIAM M. ISENHOWER, SHIN-TOWER WANG “Analysis and design of deep foundations “2006 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Braja M.Das. California State University, Sacramento. “Advanced Soil Mechanics”, Second Edition, United State of America. 1997




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i6.3252

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.