Re-imagining Metro Manila: Potential Impacts of Mass Transit for a Megalopolis

Dominic S. Aloc, Jose Regin F. Regidor

Abstract


Metro Manila is a metropolis comprised of 15 cities and 1 municipality with a population of over 13 million people. It is already considered as a megalopolis together with adjoining provinces to the north, east and south. Despite it being highly urbanized, the city is dependent of road-based transport, with about 80% of commuters taking public transportation but with 70% of road space taken up by cars. Metro Manila currently has only 4 railways lines – Line 1 along Taft Avenue, Rizal Avenue and EDSA, Line 2 along Aurora Boulevard and Marcos Highway, Line 3 along EDSA, and the commuter line of the old Philippine National Railways. If plans formulated since the 1970s were realized, then commuting would have been very different in Metro Manila, where majority of commuters could have been using rail-based transport. This study examines the counterfactual scenarios of mass transit development in the context of co-benefits for Metro Manila over the past four decades, focusing on rail transport. The outcomes of simulated scenarios are used as inputs towards the quantification of transport co-benefits. These co-benefits include improved air quality, more efficient fuel consumption, safer roads, and reduced travel time. The evaluation procedure was based from the Transport Co-benefits Guidelines developed by the Institute of Global Environmental Strategies. The assessment of transport and traffic conditions as related to rail-based mass transit development showed a very significant potential for alleviating transport and traffic congestion in Metro Manila, thereby improving the quality of life for people.

Keywords


mass transit; co-benefits; rail transport

Full Text:

PDF

References


United Nations, "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change," 1992. [Online]. Available: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/background/application/pdf/convention_text_with_annexes_english_for_posting.pdf. [Accessed 13 May 2017].

United Nations, "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change," 1998. [Online]. Available: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf. [Accessed 8 July 2017].

United Nations, "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change," 2015. [Online]. Available: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf. [Accessed 8 July 2017].

LEDS Global Partnership, "Transport Co-benefits Calculator," 2 October 2015. [Online]. Available: http://ledsgp.org/resource/transport-co-benefits-calculator/?loclang=en_gb. [Accessed 10 July 2017].

Ministry of the Environment, Japan, "The Co-benefits Approach for GHG Emission Reduction Projects," Tokyo, 2009.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, “The Integrated Environmental Strategies Handbook,” US EPA, Washington, DC, 2004.

Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, “Mainstreaming Transport Co-benefits Approach: A Guide to Evaluating Transport Projects,” IGES, Japan, 2011.

C. Doll and H. Farzaneh, "The Co-benefits Evaluation Tool for the Urban Transport Sector," UNU-IAS, Yokohama, 2014.

C. K. Castillo, D. C. Sanqui, M. Ajero and C. Huizenga, "The Co-Benefits of Responding to Climate Change: Status in Asia," 2007.

Victoria Transport Policy Institute, "Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis II – Travel Time Costs," in Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis: Techniques, Estimates and Implications, 2017, pp. 5.2-1-5.2-26.

European Commission, "ExternE Project," 1998.

J. R. F. Regidor, D. S. Aloc, A. M. Fillone and K. J. C. Lucas, "What if Metro Manila Developed a Comprehensive Rail Transit Network?," in Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies Conference, Vietnam, 2017.

A. M. Fillone, "Evaluating Proposed Transportation Infrastructure Projects in Metro Manila Using the Transport Co-benefit Analysis," Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol. 11, pp. 189-208, 2015.

T. R. Miller, J. B. Douglass and N. M. Pindus, "Railroad injury: Causes, costs, and comparisons with other transport modes," Journal of Safety Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 183-195, 1994.

O. Toshiyumi, et al., "Measurement of the Effects of Environmentally Friendly Commodities Using Social Environmental Economics and Policy Studies," 2002.

Overseas Technical Cooperation Agency, Urban Transport Study in Manila Metropolitan Area, 1973.

Freeman Fox and Associates, MMETROPLAN Metro Manila Transport, Land Use and Development Planning Project Final Report: Main Volume, Hongkong, 1977.

Japan International Cooperation Agency, Metro Manila Urban Transportation Integration Study, 1999.

Japan International Cooperation Agency, Roadmap for Transport Infrastructure Development for Metro Manila and its Surrounding Areas (Region III & Region IV-A): Final Report: Technical Report No.2 Transport Demand Analyis, 2014.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i6.3283

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.