The Barrier and Driver Factors of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Adoption in Indonesia: A Preliminary Survey

Faizal Restu Utomo, Mohammad Arif Rohman

Abstract


Building information modeling (BIM) changes institutions, businesses, business models, education, workplaces and careers. For an asset owner the implementation of BIM should seen as a business change program that can potentially impact their ‘value proposition’. BIM can enable strategic business outcomes. BIM is useful for geometric modelling of a building's performance and it can assist in the management of construction projects. The construction industry in the world has recognized the benefits of BIM, therefore many large projects in developed countries have used BIM. In Indonesia, lately BIM has received more attention from construction industry players, even the Indonesian government through the public works agency issued guidelines for BIM adoption in 2018 with reference to developed country references such as Singapore. Many benefits can be obtained from the implementation of BIM, but the level of BIM adoption in Indonesia is still low. Thus, it warrants a study such as the present to determine what are the actual barriers that hamper its implementation and what are the driving factors that could enhance its pace of implementation in the Indonesian construction industry. This paper is an initial stage of the research to determine the barriers and driving factors of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in Indonesia. Following the variable identification from the literature, a preliminary survey involving eleven experts were conducted to verify several variables that have been identified from the literature to be used for the questionnaire survey. According to the experts’ opinion, it was found that 16 variables were considered relevant to measure the barriers of BIM adoption in Indonesia and 18 variables were considered relevant to measure the driving factors of BIM Adoption in Indonesia. The three most relevant barriers BIM adoption in Indonesia attributes were also determined according to the experts’ opinion, that are (1) Lack of BIM expert; (2) Lack of understanding about BIM and its benefits; (3) Resistance to change. The three most relevant drivers BIM adoption in Indonesia attributes were also determined according to the experts’ opinion, that are (1) Willingness/intention; (2) Technological factors; (3) Organizational culture

Keywords


building information modelling; barrier; driver; BIM adoption; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ž. Turk, “Ten questions concerning building information modelling,” Build. Environ., vol. 107, pp. 274–284, Oct. 2016.

P. E. D. Love, J. Matthews, I. Simpson, A. Hill, and O. A. Olatunji, “A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners,” Autom. Constr., vol. 37, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2014.

D. Bryde, M. Broquetas, and J. M. Volm, “The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM),” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 971–980, Oct. 2013.

R. Ahuja, M. Jain, A. Sawhney, and M. Arif, “Adoption of BIM by architectural firms in India: technology–organization–environment perspective,” Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 311–330, Jul. 2016.

NBS, “NBS International BIM Report,” UK, 2016.

M. Reza Hosseini, E. A. Pärn, D. J. Edwards, E. Papadonikolaki, and M. Oraee, “Roadmap to mature BIM use in Australian SMEs: Competitive dynamics perspective,” J. Manag. Eng., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1–13, Sep. 2018.

G. Gegana and T. H. Widjanarso, “BIM Course Development and Its Future Integration At University Of Indonesia and Institute Of Technology Bandung Indonesia.” 9th BIM Academic Symposium & Job Task Analysis Review, Washington, USA, 2015.

Y. Hanifah, “Awareness dan pemanfaatan BIM : Studi eksplorasi,” in ProsidingTemuIlmiah IPLBI 2016, 2016, pp. H094–H054.

BIM PUPR and Institut BIM Indonesia, Panduan Adopsi BIM dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: Pusat Litbang Kebijakan dan Penerapan Teknologi, 2018.

KEMENPUPR and PT. PP, “Implementasi BIM (Building Information Modelling),” 2017.

A. S. Telaga, “A review of BIM (Building Information Modeling) implementation in Indonesia construction industry,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 352, no. 1, p. 012030, May 2018.

C. Sun, S. Jiang, M. J. Skibniewski, Q. Man, and L. Shen, “A literature review of the factors limiting the application of BIM in the construction industry,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 764–779, Nov. 2015.

K. Ku and M. Taiebat, “BIM experiences and expectations: The constructors’ perspective,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 175–197, Jul. 2011.

N. Gu and K. London, “Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry,” Autom. Constr., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 988–999, Dec. 2010.

R. Eadie, H. Odeyinka, M. Browne, C. McKeown, and M. Yohanis, “Electronic journal of information technology in construction.,” J. Inf. Technol. Constr., vol. 18, pp. 338–352, 2013.

W. A. Hatem and A. M. Abd, “Barriers of adoption Building Information Modeling (BIM) in construction projects of Iraq,” Eng. J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 59–81, 2018.

A. Elmualim and J. Gilder, “BIM: innovation in design management, influence and challenges of implementation,” Archit. Eng. Des. Manag., vol. 10, no. 3–4, pp. 183–199, Jul. 2014.

Y. Arayici, P. Coates, L. Koskela, M. Kagioglou, C. Usher, and K. O’Reilly, “Technology adoption in the BIM implementation for lean architectural practice,” Autom. Constr., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 189–195, Mar. 2011.

A. Aibinu and S. Venkatesh, “Status of BIM adoption and the BIM experience of cost consultants in Australia,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 140, no. 3, p. 04013021, Jul. 2014.

H. Son, S. Lee, and C. Kim, “What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? An empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects’ behavioral intentions,” Autom. Constr., vol. 49, pp. 92–99, Jan. 2015.

D. Cao, H. Li, and G. Wang, “Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 140, no. 12, p. 04014056, Dec. 2014.

P. Anker Jensen and E. Ingi Jóhannesson, “Building information modelling in Denmark and Iceland,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 99–110, Jan. 2013.

A. L. Ahmed and M. Kassem, “A unified BIM adoption taxonomy: Conceptual development, empirical validation and application,” Autom. Constr., vol. 96, pp. 103–127, Dec. 2018.

H. Xu, J. Feng, and S. Li, “Users-orientated evaluation of building information model in the Chinese construction industry,” Autom. Constr., vol. 39, pp. 32–46, Apr. 2014.

J. Rogers, H.-Y. Chong, and C. Preece, “Adoption of Building Information Modelling technology (BIM),” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 424–445, Jul. 2015.

Y. Jung and M. Joo, “Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation,” Autom. Constr., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 126–133, Mar. 2011.

M.-H. Tsai, M. Mom, and S.-H. Hsieh, “Developing critical success factors for the assessment of BIM technology adoption: part I. Methodology and survey,” J. Chinese Inst. Eng., vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 845–858, Oct. 2014.

V. Singh and J. Holmström, “Needs and technology adoption: observation from BIM experience,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 128–150, Mar. 2015.

M. A. Rohman, H. Doloi, and C. A. Heywood, “Success criteria of toll road projects from a community societal perspective,” Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 32–44, Feb. 2017.

I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2005.

D. F. Polit and B. P. Hungler, Nursing Research : Principles and Methods, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1999.

D. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas, 2008.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6291

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.