Analysis Implementation of The Project Management Tools and Techniques PT. XYZ in Indonesia

Maulana Mufti Muhamamd, Budi Santosa

Abstract


The level of business competition of an organization at this time is increasingly high. This is caused by economic factors and the presence of new competitors. Many organizations do not have the ability to deal with these conditions. Management of innovation and improvement that is limited by time, cost and quality are referred to as project management. Many methods, techniques, and tools have been developed, covering all aspects of project management from start to finish. If project management practices are implemented correctly, it allows for increased efficiency and productivity. In this study, how project management is implemented by evaluating the use of project management tools and effectiveness in supporting projects that run in the organization of PT. XYZ. This is done by distributing questionnaires to 30 respondents involved in the project that was carried out in 2018 to the present. The analytical method used is descriptive analysis and inferencing using SPSS used to determine the use of tools and project management techniques. Results in this study project management tools and techniques most often used by PT XYZ are progress reports, activity lists, and project charter. From the position positional factors and managed project costs factors are have significant value that affects the use of project management tools and techniques at PT XYZ in Indonesia

Keywords


project management; project management tools and techniques; project management implementation

Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Fernandes, S. Ward, and M. Araújo, “Improving and embedding project management practices in organisations,” in 2013 PMI Global Proceedings, 2013.

D. White and J. Fortune, “Current practice in project management - An empirical study,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2002.

T. J. Cooke-Davies, L. H. Crawford, and T. G. Lechler, “Project management systems: Moving project management from an operational to a strategic discipline,” Proj. Manag. J., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 110–123, Mar. 2009.

C. X. Dai and W. G. Wells, “An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 523–532, 2004.

S. J. Whitty, “A memetic paradigm of project management,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 575–583, 2005.

H. Kerzner, Gestão de Projetos: as melhores práticas. Bookman Companhia Editora, 2004.

J. K. Pinto and O. P. Kharbanda, “How to fail in project management (without really trying),” Bus. Horiz., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 45–53, 1996.

T. Cooke-Davies, “The ‘real’ success factors on projects,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 185–190, 2002.

C. Besner and B. Hobbs, “Project management practice, generic or contextual: A reality check,” Proj. Manag. J., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 16–33, 2008.

Association for Project Management, APM Body of Knowledge. High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire: Association for Project Management, 2006.

K. E. Papke-Shields, C. Beise, and J. Quan, “Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success?,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 650–662, 2010.

PMI (Project Management Institute), “A Guide To The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK GUIDE),” 2008.

M. Ferreira, A. Tereso, P. Ribeiro, G. Fernandes, and I. Loureiro, “Project management practices in Private Portuguese Organizations,” Procedia Technol., vol. 9, pp. 608–617, 2013.

M. Saunders, P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students. Harlow, England: Pearson Education, 2009.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6413

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.