Framework Analysis Using The Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) Method in Human Resources Information System Development

Dhimas Pamungkas Wicaksono, Chastine Fatichah

Abstract


The framework application in the first phase of the Human Resources Information System (HRIS) development at X Company, which is a mining company, has so far been considered to have encountered many problems, with bugs and defects frequently being found that occurred when the project was deployed to a production environment. This happens due to frequent changes in project requirements in the middle of the development process, so many features become less relevant to business systems. So making decisions quickly and precisely before the first phase ends is necessary. The Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) method was taken because it is a rapid review, which only a few weeks can decide based on field objective evidence. The use of a questionnaire involving project members was compared with the literature review results, namely that five aspects affected the time to develop: organizational aspects, process aspects, project aspects, people aspects, and technical aspects. The Scrum framework is a framework that is much more relevant to the current project conditions, with 3.6-point results and 3.1 points for the waterfall.

Keywords


Framework Analysis; Human Resources Information System; Project Condition; Rapid View; Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA); SCRUM

Full Text:

Full Text

References


Siahaan D. Analisa Kebutuhan dalam Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak. 1 ed. Penerbit Andi; 2012. NULL.

Subih MA, Malik BH, Mazhar I, ul Hassan I, Sabir U, Wakeel T, et al. Comparison of agile method and scrum method with software quality affecting factors. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 2019;10:531–535.

Sutherland J, Jacobson I, Kerr B. Scrum Essentials Cards. Queue 2020 jun;18(3):83–106. https://doi.org/10.11451/3411757.3418775.

Prasetya KD, Suharjito, Pratama D. Effectiveness Analysis of Distributed Scrum Model Compared to Waterfall approach in Third-Party Application Development. Procedia Computer Science 2021;179:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.12.014.

Nussbaumer-Streit B, Mayr V, Dobrescu AI, Chapman A, Persad E, Klerings I, et al. Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020 apr;https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013574.

Varker T, Forbes D, Dell L, Weston A, Merlin T, Hodson S, et al. Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2015 jun;21(6):1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12405.

Thesing T, Feldmann C, Burchardt M. Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project. Procedia Computer Science 2021;181:746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs. 2021.01.227.

Barends E, Rousseau DM, Briner RB. CEBMa guideline for rapid evidence assessments in management and organizations. Center for Evidence-Based Management; 2017.

Betta J, Boronina L. Transparency in Project Management from Traditional to Agile. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Economic and Business Management (FEBM 2018) Atlantis Press; 2018. p. 446–449. https://doi.org/10.2991/febm-18.2018.103.

Najihi S, Elhadi S, Abdelouahid RA, Marzak A. Software Testing from an Agile and Traditional view. Procedia Computer Science 2022;203:775–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.116.

Chow T, Cao DB. A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of Systems and Software 2008;81(6):961–971. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121207002208, agile Product Line Engineering.

Altuwaijri FS, Ferrario MA. Factors affecting Agile adoption: An industry research study of the mobile app sector in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Systems and Software 2022 aug;190:111347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111347.

Misra SC, Kumar V, Kumar U. Identifying some important success factors in adopting agile software development practices. Journal of Systems and Software 2009;82(11):1869–1890. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412120900123X, sI: TAIC PART 2007 and MUTATION 2007.

Eilers K, Peters C, Leimeister JM. Why the agile mindset matters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2022 jun;179:121650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121650.

Kula E, Greuter E, van Deursen A, Gousios G. Factors Affecting On-Time Delivery in Large-Scale Agile Software Development. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2022 sep;48(9):3573–3592. https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2021.3101192.

Gabriel S, Niewoehner N, Asmar L, Kühn A, Dumitrescu R. Integration of agile practices in the product development process of intelligent technical systems. Procedia CIRP 2021;100:427–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.099.

Sirshar M, Ali SH, Baig HS. Project Management’s Triple Constraints Mapping on Augmented Reality based Learning System for Improved Quality; 2019, https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201912.0121.v1, preprint on webpage at https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201912.0121/v1.

Verma H. Software Development Life Cycle: Factors affecting Software Quality. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 2019 3;6:198–202.

Heimicke J, Kaiser S, Albers A. Agile product development: an analysis of acceptance and added value in practice. Procedia CIRP 2021;100:768–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.046.

Bhavsar K, , Shah V, Gopalan S. Scrum Challenges: An Agile Process Reengineering in Software Engineering. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering 2020 feb;9(4):1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.d1567.029420.

Kosztyán ZT, Jakab R, Novák G, Hegedűs C. Survive IT! Survival analysis of IT project planning approaches. Operations Research Perspectives 2020;7:100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2020.100170.

Takagi N, Varajão J. Integration of success management into project management guides and methodologies - position paper. Procedia Computer Science 2019;164:366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.195.

Rossouw SF. Research Methodology for the Business and Administrative Sciences. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 2000;26:a690.

Hinderks A, Schrepp M, Mayo FJD, Escalona MJ, Thomaschewski J. Developing a UX KPI based on the user experience

questionnaire. Computer Standards and Interfaces 2019 7;65:38–44.

Santoso HB, Schrepp M, Hasani LM, Fitriansyah R, Setyanto A. The use of User Experience Questionnaire Plus (UEQ+) for cross-cultural UX research: evaluating Zoom and Learn Quran Tajwid as online learning tools. Heliyon 2022;8:E11748.

Masriah I. The Influence of Motivation and Work Experience on Employee Productivity. PINISI Discretion Review 2020 3;3:331–338.

Kenett RS. Implementing SCRUM using Business Process Management and Pattern Analysis Methodologies. Dynamic Relationships Management Journal 2013;2:29–48.

Patrucco AS, Canterino F, Minelgaite I. How do Scrum Methodologies Influence the Team’s Cultural Values? A Multiple Case Study on Agile Teams in Nonsoftware Industries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2022;69:3503–3513




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j20882033.v34i1.15740

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

IPTEK Journal of Science and Technology by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, ITS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://iptek.its.ac.id/index.php/jts.