Risk Analysis and Mitigation in the Procurement Process of Overhaul Services

Adinda Sushmita Dewanti, Putu Dana Karningsih

Abstract


PT. XYZ is one of subsidiaries of state-owned company which has core business in Power Generation and Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Services for power plants. There are a lot of challenges that should be faced by PT. XYZ as a maintenance unit to achieve the on cost, on time and on quality target. Therefore, we need an analysis and risk mitigation in the procurement process of overhaul routine services to assist companies in dealing with potential risks. Risk identification is carried out using literature studies and expert panels. After that, the risk will be analyzed using the Analytic Network Process and House of Risk methods. The use of the ANP method in this study is as additional tools to support the HOR method because in this study it is possible to have a relationship between risk events and risk agents. This relationship is not captured by the HOR method because the HOR method only considers the relationship between the risk event and the risk agent. The results shows that there are 23 risk events that caused by 37 risk agents. Based on ARP result, there are 2 main mitigation efforts that can be done by the company which are increase the coordination between stakeholder and implemented the time-based contract for overhaul routine services. These efforts hopefully could help the company to reduce the probability of risk agents so the overhaul will not be affected.

Keywords


Risk Management; Procurement; Analytic Network Process (ANP); House of Risk (HOR)

Full Text:

PDF

References


. Paul Hopkin, Fundamentals of Risk Management: Understanding, Evaluating and Implementing Effective Risk Management, 5th ed. New York: Kogan Page, 2018

. Williams C. Arthur Jr, Michael L, Smith, Peter C Young, Risk Management and Insurance, 7th ed. McGraw Hill International: Edition Financial Series, 1995

. T.L Saaty and L.G Vargas, Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, 2nd ed. Pittsburgh: Springer, 2006

. I. Nyoman Pujawan & Laudine H. Geraldin, “House of risk: model for proactive supply chain risk management,” Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 953-967, 2009

. Chendrasari W. Oktavia, “Analisis dan Mitigasi Risiko Pada Proses Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Dengan Pendekatan Metode Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM), Analytic Network Process (ANP), Dan House Of Risk (HOR)” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2013

. Alarm Airmic and IRM, A Structured Approach to Enterprise Risk Management and the Requirement of ISO 31000, London: The Institute of Risk Management, 2010

. D. N. Burt, S.D. Petcavage and R.L. Pinkerton, Proactive Purchasing in the Supply Chain: The Key to World-Class Procurement, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012

. R.H Clough and Sears G.A, Construction Contracting, 6th. ed. New Mexico: Jhon Willey and Sons Inc, 1994 [9] Herman Darmawi, Manajemen Risiko, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2013

. J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Boston: Springer Science, 2005

. Ricky W Griffin, Management, 7th ed, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002

. T.L Saaty, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytical Hierarcy Process, Pittsburgh: RWS publication, 2004

. M. R. Wideman, Project and Program Risk Management: A Guide to Managing Project Risks and Opportunities (PMBOK Handbooks), Philadelphia: Project Management Institute, 1992.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i3.11131

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.