Improvement of Operational Risk Measurement Accuracy on Power Plant Using Qualitative and Quantitative Method

Hani Wibieanto, Adithya Sudiarno

Abstract


Implementation of maintenance programs in order to improve the performance of power plants required considerable cost, while existing funding sources are limited. Prioritization of maintenance program implementation based on risk level is needed to optimize the performance of power plant unit and maintenance cost required. The process of determining the level of risk can be done with qualitative and quantitative methods, each has advantages and disadvantages. This research compared accuracy of risk number on main equipment of power plant determined using qualitative method, quantitative methods and combined method which is the combination of weighted qualitative and quantitative risk number. Weight of qualitative risk is determined by the engineers in a focus group discussion (FGD) based on technology and capability criteria of equipment such as condition monitoring technology, warning system technology, ability to activate protection system, and load pattern of equipment, to improve the accuracy of risk measurement. Result from the calculations shows that risk number generated from the calculation using combined method has the closest average value and standard deviation to the actual loss

Keywords


risk priority number; quantitative risk assessment method; FMEA; risk based maintenance

Full Text:

PDF

References


P. B. Cline, “The Merging of Risk Analysis and Adventure Education,” in Wilderness Risk Management, 2004.

R. Antunes and V. Gonzalez, “A production model for construction: A theoretical framework,” Buildings, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 209–228, Mar. 2015.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 31000 Risk management. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2018.

R. M. C. Ratnayake and K. Antosz, “Development of a risk matrix and extending the risk-based maintenance analysis with fuzzy logic,” Procedia Eng., vol. 182, pp. 602–610, Jan. 2017.

G. Pui, J. Bhandari, E. Arzaghi, R. Abbassi, and V. Garaniya, “Risk-based maintenance of offshore Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) operation,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 159, pp. 513–521, Nov. 2017.

J. Carretero et al., “Applying RCM in large scale systems: a case study with railway networks,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 257–273, Dec. 2003.

F. I. Khan and M. M. Haddara, “Risk-based maintenance (RBM): a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 561–573, Nov. 2003.

J. E. Aller, N. C. Horowitz, J. T. Reynolds, and B. J. Weber, “Risk based inspection for the petrochemical industry,” Risk Saf. Assess. where is Balanc., 1995.

P. M. Hagemeijer and G. Kerkveld, “A methodology for risk-based inspection of pressurized systems,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng., vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 37–47, Feb. 1998.

P. K. Dey, S. O. Ogunlana, S. S. Gupta, and M. T. Tabucanon, “A risk-based maintenance model for cross-country pipelines,” Cost Eng., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 24–31, 1998




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2019i1.5129

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.