Determining Constructions Phase Risk Mitigation of Shutdown Valve Control Panel Replacement Project West Madura Offshore

Shoffan Abdi Tunggal, Ervina Ahyudanari

Abstract


PHA is an oil and gas Cooperation Contract Contractor (KKKS) in Indonesia, playing an important role in achieving the national oil and gas production target. To maintain operational and production continuity, a replacements shutdown valve control panel project performs at the production facility of West Madura offshore field. It was the first control panel replacement project carried out at the live production facility. Project team identify some high risk activity through process and occupational safety. Research needs in order to determine construction phase project risk mitigation, by hazard identification, risk analysis, classification and proposed preventive actions as necessary. Proposed analysis and risk management determined by Focus Group Discussion and House of Risk modeling methods, research identified 23 risk events, 23 risk agents, risk mitigation defined by aggregate risk potential and its prioritie. Aiming on reducing risk occurrence and improving positive impact for sustainability and objectives of the project. 24 preventive actions are selected with 5 top priority preventive action proposed.

Keywords


Risk Mitigation; Risk Register; House Of Risk; Shutdown Valve; Oil And Gas Industry.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. P. Institute, API STD 598: Valve Inspection & Testing, 10th ed. United States: American Petroleum Institute (API), 2016.

M. A. Lundteigen and M. Rausand, “Partial stroke testing of process shutdown valves: How to determine the test coverage,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 579–588, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.007.

A. Albert, M. R. Hallowell, and B. M. Kleiner, “Enhancing construction hazard recognition and communication with energy-based cognitive mnemonics and safety meeting maturity model: multiple baseline Study,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 140, no. 2, p. 04013042, 2014, doi: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000790.

I. for O. S. and H. (NIOSH), “Hierarchy of Controls.” Department of Health & Human Services, United State, 2018.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, Manajemen Risiko — Prinsip dan Pedoman (ISO 31000:2009,IDT). Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2016.

C. W. Oktavia, “Analisis dan Mitigasi Resiko dengan Pendekatan Interpretetive Structural Modeling (ISM), Analytical Network Process (ANP), dan House of Risk (HOR) pada Proses Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di PT. Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk,” Institut Teknologi epuluh Nopember, Surabaya, 2005.

R. Fitriana, “Kajian Risiko Keselamatan Kerja Pada Proses Overhaul Tangki Timbun L.3 di PT Pertamina (Persero) Refinery Unit III Plaju-Sungai Gerong-Palembang,” Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia., 2012.

D. Kurniasari, “Aplikasi Model House of Risk ( Hor ) Untuk Mitigasi

Risiko Proyek Pembangunan Jalan,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XI, 2014, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–10.

A. Retna Maharani, “Perancangan Manajemen Risiko Operasional Di Pt . X Dengan Menggunakan Metode House of Risk,” Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya, 2018.

M. A. Mustafa and J. F. Al-Bahar, “Project Risk Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 1991, doi: 10.1109/17.65759.

I. P. A. Wiguna and S. Scott, “Nature Of The Critical Risk Factors Affecting Project Performance In Indonesian Building Contracts,” in 21st Annual ARCOM Conference, 2005, pp. 225–235.

O. J. Tveit, “Safety issues on offshore process installations. An overview,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 267–272, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0950-4230(94)80039-1.

National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, Deep Water – The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future of Offshore Drilling, vol. 30, no. 2. USA: National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, 2011.

O. H. and S. Assessment, BS OHSAS 18001 (2018), Occupational Health and Safety Assessment. United Kingdom: International Organization for Standardization, 2018.

Australian/New Zealand Standard, Risk Management AS/NZS 4360:2004, 2nd ed. Sydney and Wellington: Standards Autralia International Ltd and Standars New Zealand, 1999.

Alberta Environment, Risk Management Guidelines for Petroleum Storage Tank Sites, no. October. Street Edmonton, Alberta: Science and Standards Division Alberta Environment, 2001.

K. Miller, “An offshore gas field safety strategy and quantitative risk assessment model,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 331–336, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0950-4230(94)80046-4.

Standard, Australia, and License, Guidelines for Managing Risk: AS/NZS 4360. Australia: Standards Association of Australia, 1999.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i6.8898

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View my Stat: Click Here

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.