Analisa Kualitas Pelayanan di Departemen Teknik Kimia Industri, Fakultas Vokasi ITS Surabaya dalam perspektif Higher Education Performance (HEdPerf)
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to measure the performance of service quality by using students' perceptions of service quality performance at the Department of Industrial Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Vocational Studies ITS Surabaya Indonesia through the Higher Education Performance (HEdPerf) measurement scale using six structural dimensions consisting of Non-Academic Aspects, Academic Aspects, Reputation, Access, Program Issues, and Understanding. Quantitative descriptive method, questionnaire survey with Probability Sampling technique, and Proportioned Stratified Random Sampling collecti0n technique were used as methods in this study. The results of the analysis using Importance-Performance Analysis show the similarity of the measurement results between each service item measurement and the measurement of the factor/dimensional structure instrument. The reputation factor is a top priority for improving service quality. Academic and Access factors have service quality that must be maintained. Understanding Program Factors and Problems is the second priority for improving service quality. Then non-academic factors indicate that the quality of service exceeds student expectations
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, F. (2006a). The development of HEdPERF : a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x
Abdullah, F. (2006b). Measuring service quality in higher education: Three instruments compared. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500537445
BUß, I. (2019). The relevance of study programme structures for flexible learning: an empirical analysis. Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung, November. https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-14-03/18
Effendi, S., & Tukiran. (2012). Metode Penelitian Survei (30th ed.). LP3ES, Jakarta - Indonesia.
Harahap, D. A., Hurriyati, R., Gaffar, V., & Amanah, D. (2018). The impact of word of mouth and university reputation on student decision to study at university. Management Science Letters, 8(6), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.4.027
Ibrahim, A., & El Zataari, W. (2020). The teacher–student relationship and adolescents’ sense of school belonging. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1660998
Kitcharoen, K. (2004). The Importance-Performance Analysis of Service Quality In Administrative Departments Of Private Universities In Thailand. ABAC Journal, 24(3), 20–46.
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (2013). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1250495
Mohammad Faisal Amir. (2016). Manajemen Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi. Mitra Wacana Media, Jakarta.
Penprase, B. E. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Higher Education (N. W. Gleason (ed.)). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0194-0
PP No. 96 Tahun 2012. (2012). PERATURAN PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 96 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PELAKSANAAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 25 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PELAYANAN PUBLIK.
Purwanto, Y., Noor, I., & Kusumawati, A. (2020). Service Quality Measurement through Higher Education Performance ( HEDPERF ) The Case of an Indonesian Public University. Wacana, 23(1), 10–16.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. CV. ALFABETA, Bandung - Indonesia.
Tjiptono, F., & Chandra, G. (2016). Service, Quality & Satisfaction (IV). CV. ANDI OFFSET (Penerbit ANDI), Yogyakarta - Indonesia.
Xing, B., & Marwala, T. (2017). Implications of the Fourth Industrial Age on Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773X/87
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v15i1.11416
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.