Religious Populism and Public Sphere in Indonesia

Robertus Wijanarko

Abstract


Religious populism has strong and profound influence in Indonesia. It challenges the rational foundation of the democratic structure of the Indonesian Politics. This populist political movement utilizes religious language and symbols as their language of political articulation, negotiation, and contestation, which then occupies the real and virtual public sphere of the politics of Indonesia. Therefore, this use of religious language and symbols has placed democratic system in a serious risk. This critical study is intended to investigate the disadvantages of the use of religious language and symbols in the political arena in Indonesia. I will employ Paul Ricour’s thoughts in his writing, The Fragility of Political Language, as a lens of analysis for that phenomenon. Through that analysis I argue that the use of religious language and symbols in political discourse contradicts the provisional character of political language in democratic political settings.  I suggest, therefore, the reenactment of the constitutional and rational foundation of democratic structure of Politics in Indonesia is seriously required.

Keywords


Populism, Religious Populism, Public Sphere, Political Language, reenactment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities : reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

Babić, M. 1. (2019). Populism and Religion in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Concilium.

Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. (T. Burger, Ed.) (First). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Hadiz, V. R. (2019). Populisme Islam di Indonesia dan Timur Tengah (Edisi Pert). Jakarta: LP3ES.

Hardiman, F. B. (2017). Kebangkitan Populisme Kanan dalam Negara Hukum Demokratis. Prisma: Jurnal Pemikiran Sosial Ekonomi, 36(2), 3–9.

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism : a very short introduction (First Edit). Hants: Oxford University Press.

Muller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1987). The Fragility of Political Language. Philosophy Today, 31, 35–44.

Wijanarko, R. (2000). Mengkritisi Penggunaan Bahasa Agama dalam Wacana dan Kehidupan Politik. Seri Filsafat Teologi Widya Sasana, 101–110.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j24433527.v0i0.8547

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

p-ISSN (1979-5521)  e-ISSN (2443-3527)