Performance based design of Hospital Building in Surabaya under variety design alternative using SNI 1726-2019 – Case study: Redesign Building

Sigit Darmawan, Raden Buyung Darmawan, Ridho Bayuaji, Yuyun Tajunnisa, Indra Komara, Sita Auliyah Rahmasari


Nowadays, At the present time, the occurrence of regular earthquakes all over the world is turning into a significant problem. The structures that make up hospitals are among the most significant buildings in a living society because, in the event that a potentially dangerous scenario emerges, they help to serve as a caring and healing unit for the human population. A hospital building is made up of three different components: the structural component, the non-structural component, and the functional component. Each of these components can have an effect, either directly or indirectly, on the management and operation of the hospital building. Each time a natural or non-natural cause causes devastation and disaster, the globe suffers. In such cases, hospital buildings are vital in term of treating victims and injured persons, and housing those who lost their homes. Therefore, hospital facilities should be planned and constructed with enough stiffness and strength to resist disasters and serve as shelters or housing units afterward. This study analyses a hospital in area of Surabaya which built using Indonesian standard provision SNI 1726-2012. Weak structural members of the hospital are identified. The analysis determined to study the behaviour of hospital building when subjected to seismic forces using ETABS using current provision SNI 1726-2019. The investigation determined that the effect of the lateral forces under P-delta effect on the hospital building. Two different conditions have been compared, e.g., existing model and alternative configuration using dual system method to determining the recommendation for current building to resist seismic forces under new regulation. As a result, existing structure of hospital building still meet the requirements, but to fill the condition in accordance with SNI 1726-2019, some modifications need to be improved.


ETABS, Hospital Building, Pushover Analysis, Retrofitting, Seismic Assessment

Full Text:



A. M. Sanjaya and I. Imran, ‘Seismic performances of high rise r/c frame structures reinforced with high strength rebars’, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 431–443, 2018, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4318.

B. Bhattacharyay, Estimating Demand for Infrastructure in Energy, Transport, Telecommunications, Water, and Sanitation in Asia and the Pacific: 2010-2020, no. January 2010. 2012.

FEMA-350, ‘Recommended Seismic Design Critria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings Fema 350’, p. 224, 2000, doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

N. R. Provisions, ‘NEHRP RECOMMENDED PROVISIONS Steel Design : Context in Provisions Design basis : Strength limit state’, Fema451, pp. 1–120.

S. 1726:2012, ‘Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung’, Badan Stand. Nas. Indones., no. 8, p. 254, 2019.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, ‘Sni 1726-2019’, Tata Cara Perenc. Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Strukt. Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung, no. 8, p. 254, 2019.

Soelarso, Baehaki, and F. D. Subhan, ‘Analisis Struktur Beton Bertulang SPRMK terhadap Beban Gempa Statik dan Dinamik dengan Peraturan SNI 1726: 2012’, J. Fondasi, vol. 4 Nomor 2, pp. 1–7, 2015, [Online]. Available:

Ngudiyono, ‘Perhitungan Beban Gempa Statik Ekivalen SNI 1726-2019’, no. April, 2020.

Y. Arfiadi and D. I. Satyarno, ‘Perbandingan Spektra Desain Beberapa Kota Besar Di Indonesia Dalam Sni Gempa 2012 Dan Sni Gempa 2002 (233S)’, Strukt. Konf. Nas. Tek. Sipil Univ. Sebel. Maret -Surakarta, vol. 7, no. 2005, pp. 24–26, 2013.

R. Bulgis, A. Sonia, S. Darmawan, and A. N. Refani, ‘Dengan Metode Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Menengah ( Srpmm ) Dengan Metode Sistem Rangka Pemikul Momen Menengah ( Srpmm )’, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 2017.

Badan Standardisasi Indonesia, Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan non gedung, vol. 15, no. 3. 2003.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, ‘Persyaratan Beton Struktural Untuk Bangunan Gedung Dan Penjelasan Sebagai Revisi Dari Standar Nasional Indonesia. SNI 03-2847:2019’, Badan Standarisasi Nas., no. 8, pp. 1–695, 2019.

S. B., M. R., and H. A.L., ‘Predicting the Response of Shear-critical Reinforced Concrete Beams using Response-2000 and SNI 2847:2013’, Civ. Eng. Dimens., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2016, doi: 10.9744/ced.18.1.16-24.

Y. Andriyani et al., ‘Analisa sistem rangka pemikul momen menengah terhadap karakterisasi kelas situs batuan keras (SA), batuan (SB) dan Batuan Lunak (SC) berbasis respon spectrum’, pp. 188–198, 2017.


A. Bagheri, M. Petkovski, K. Pilakoutas, and R. Mirghaderi, ‘Experimental work on cold-formed steel elements for earthquake resilient moment frame buildings’, Eng. Struct., vol. 42, pp. 371–386, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.025.

C. B. Casita and Z. R. Kamandang, ‘Analytical study of reduced beam sections under monotonic load’, IPTEK J. Proc. Ser., vol. 0, no. 6, 2018, doi: 10.12962/j23546026.y2018i6.4630.

S. analysis Program, ‘Concrete Frame Design Manual AS 3600-2001’, in Computers & Structures, no. April, 2009.

Etabs, ‘Concrete Frame Design Manual ACI 318-08 / IBC 2009’, no. December, pp. 3–13, 2016, [Online]. Available: Frame Design/CFD-ACI-318-08.pdf.

American Concrete Institute (ACI 318-99), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, vol. 2007. 1999.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. IPTEK The Journal of Engineering published by Pusat Publikasi Ilmiah, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember


Please contact us for order or further information at: email: iptek.joe[at] Fax/Telp: 031 5992945. Editorial Office Address: Pusat Riset Building 6th floor, ITS Campus, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia.