Development and Analysis of an Innovative Precast Concrete U-Shell Beam
Abstract
Precast concrete offers several advantages compared to conventional systems; precast concrete structure technology has become a strategy to enhance standardization, quality control, labor efficiency, and reduce environmental impact and construction pollution. The U-Shell precast beam is a reinforced concrete beam with a 'U' shape designed to enhance practicality and expedite the construction process as it does not require additional formwork and shoring during implementation. The U-Shell beam functions as a permanent formwork, and its design follows either monolithic or conventional methods. In multi-story buildings, using U-Shell beam can increase practical value, reduce costs, and improve time efficiency because they do not require additional formwork and scaffolding in the implementation application. This research involves the development of U-Shell precast beams, structure loading considering various loads, modeling using computer program to determine the structural reactions on each element, reinforcement design for the U-Shell beam structure, and analysis of the lifting and assembly of U-Shell precast beam. The building selected for reviewing U-Shell beams is the Building with a Special Moment Resisting Frame System. From the results of the analysis, the researcher drew several conclusions regarding the reinforcement design for the U-Shell beam under both conditions. In the condition before composite, the number of installed main reinforcements is 6 with a diameter of 13 mm, while in the condition after composite, the number increases to 8 with a diameter of 16 mm. Lifting reinforcement requires a diameter of 10 mm. The difference in reinforcement between before composite and after composite conditions is because before the composite the beam is still receiving self-load, whereas for the after composite condition the change in moment occurs. After all, the beam has received self-load and other loads. The development and analysis of an innovative precast concrete U-Sheel beam has complied with strength and serviceability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
H. Wang, E. M. Marino, P. Pan, H. Liu, and X. Nie, “Experimental study of a novel precast prestressed reinforced concrete beam- to-column joint,” Eng. Struct., vol. 156, no. October 2017, pp. 68–81, 2018.
J. Fan, G. Wu, D. Feng, Y. Zeng, and Y. Lu, “Seismic performance of a novel self-sustaining beam-column connection for precast concrete moment-resisting frames,” Eng. Struct., vol. 222, no. June, p. 111096, 2020.
S. Gou, R. Ding, J. Fan, X. Nie, and J. Zhang, “Experimental study on seismic performance of precast LSECC / RC composite joints with U-shaped LSECC beam shells,” Eng. Struct., vol. 189, no. September 2018, pp. 618–634, 2019.
S. Park, W. Hong, S. Kim, and X. Wang, “Mathematical Model of Hybrid Precast Gravity Frames for Smart Construction and Engineering,” vol. 2014, no. 2011, 2014.
U. Rahmawati, M.Kurniawan, and S. H. Dew, “Analisis Teknis Balok Pracetak (Precast) Dengan Menggunakan Metode U-Shell (Studi Kasus: Gedung Living World Pekanbaru),” Sainstek (e-Journal), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 6–14, 2018.
D. K. Bull and R. Park, “Seismic Resistance of Frames Incorporating Precast Prestressed Concrete Beam Shells,” 1986.
Y. C. Choi, J. H. Lim, J. H. Moon, K. H. Kwon, and L. H. Lee, “Inelastic behaviour of exterior wide beam-column connections with U-shaped precast shell beam stressed by post-tensioning,” Mag. Concr. Res., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 2008.
Y. Lin, Z. Chen, D. Guan, and Z. Guo, “Experimental study on interior precast concrete beam-column connections with UHPC core shells,” Structures, vol. 32, no. March, pp. 1103–1114, 2021.
H. Choi, Y. Choi, and C. Choi, “Development and testing of precast concrete beam-to-column connections,” Eng. Struct., vol. 56, pp. 1820–1835, 2013.
A. Hamidi, “Analisis Posisi Optimal Pengangkatan Balok U-Shell Dengan Menggunakan Crane,” Indones. J. Constr. Eng. Sustain. Dev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 60–65, 2020.
Nasrullah, Z. Djauhari, I. R. Sitompul, “Perbandingan Analisa Kapasitas Sambungan Balok-Kolom Konvesional Dan Pracetak Sistem U-SHELL,” Pap. Knowl. . Towar. a Media Hist. Doc., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 107–15, 2014.
R. Zhang, P. Hu, X. Zheng, L. Cai, R. Guo, and D. Wei, “Shear behavior of RC slender beams without stirrups by using precast U-shaped ECC permanent formwork,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 260, p. 120430, 2020.
X. Wang, H. Liu, Y. Ju, and D. Wang, “Experimental and analytical models of flexural behavior of U-shaped reactive powder concrete permanent beam formworks,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 300, no. May, p. 123670, 2021.
L. Tang, W. Tian, D. Guan, and Z. Chen, “Experimental Study of Emulative Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections Locally Reinforced by U-Shaped UHPC Shells,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 12, 2022.
PPIUG, “PPI untuk gedung tahun 1983.pdf.” 1983.
B. S. Nasional, “Beban Minimum untuk Perancangan Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain,” Sni 1727-2013, p. 196, 2013, [Online]. Available: www.bsn.go.id.
D. Sistem and P. Standar, “Penerapan Standar Nasional Indonesia,” no. 8, 2020.
SNI 2847 Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung, “SNI 2847:2013 Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung,” Bsn, p. 265, 2013, [Online]. Available: www.bsn.go.id.
SNI 7834-2012 Metode Uji dan Kriteria Penerimaan Struktur Rangka Pemikul Momen Beton Bertulang pracetak untuk bangunan gedung.pdf.” .
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23378557.v10i1.a20049
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. IPTEK The Journal of Engineering published by Pusat Publikasi Ilmiah, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Please contact us for order or further information at: email: iptek.joe[at]gmail.com Fax/Telp: 031 5992945. Editorial Office Address: Pusat Riset Building 6th floor, ITS Campus, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia.